Thread 512978965

>>512978965 (OP)
maybe because he looks like an evil vampire pedophile

I'm not surprised. He's much less popular than his mother.

>>512978965 (OP)
resistance to tyrants is allegiance to God

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

>>512979072
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/aug/13/over-46000-public-bodies-spurned-offer-of-free-king-charles-portrait

>>512979072
That's because he is

>>512978965 (OP)
I'm not sure why anyone would have a portrait up of a ruler unless it was mandatory
how many places other than government buildings have a pic of trump on the wall?

>>512979163
This poster would look really cool if it was char aznable instead of this emaciated freak

>>512979163
Yeah I can see why people don’t want this in their homes or businesses. Unless you run a macabre museum or heavy metal café this would clash horribly almost any decorative scheme. Also the businesses probably don’t wanna constantly stop and have to explain why they have a picture of satan hanging proudly.

>>512979163
goes hard

>>512978965 (OP)
I wouldn't mind the King if he actually did something about the state of his fucking country. He has a duty to protect his people but he refuses to do that.

>>512979163
could be black metal album cover art

>>512979317
It's nothing new, the title of emperor was rejected for the king during the imperial era, we don't engrandise our king here, he's a sockpuppet for parliament, nothing more

lol lmao

>source: Elon Musk's twitter AI
As usual you virgins will believe any shit you read on /pol/.

Why would anyone voluntarily display that demonic shot?

>>512978965 (OP)
isnt this the guy that said canadians need to give land back

>>512978965 (OP)
as long as the full version of the portrait is mass produced, i don't mind.

here's a pic of the full image.

charles is just mad at humanity because he got publicly cucked twice, even cucked by an arab. forced to raise a kid that isnt his.

he should be deposed and replaced by a kike puppet more people can get on board with

>>512982159
correct. the orgs had to apply for the photo and obviously most did not. I have never seen any place with a picture of any royal up.

>>512978965 (OP)
Captain sausage fingers needs to do something about the yookay being full of paki child rapists and aspiring doctors and engineers stabbing each-other with pocket knives

>>512983019
>needs to do something
he is doing something

>>512979163
This is a based painting.

Possibility A:
>king charles is the anti-christ, has converted to islam and this niggerworld is a humilation ritual against God's children (israelites)

Possibility B:
>trumpty drumpty is the anti-christ because he never stops talking about himself like he's god

>>512978965 (OP)
The royal family died with Queen Elizabeth, the rest of them are just a bunch of old fucks with no historical standing.

>>512978965 (OP)
They will bow to their king, soon enough

>>512979163
The butterfly is a bit on the nose, no?

>>512981809
motherfucker your anthem is "god save the king", all your armed forces are "his majesty's" shit, it's embarrassing that after 200 fucking years you're still keeping the charade going. kill your king and their inbred royal family.

>>512983266
The Bible often speaks in a singular fashion about a tribe. Like the Tribe of Jacob is often just called Jacob, or Jacob's nations etc. That doesn't literally mean Jacob himself it means the tribe. In a similar way the anti-christ is not a man. It's a tribe.
The false Edomite jews who are literally anti-christ it's right there in your face. The people who will try to establish a new world order?
Those who will sit in the third temple?
The people who are literally anti-christ?
Who the world loved?
But will one day be destroyed when the nations descend upon Israel to destroy the anti-christ (Obadiah and Revelations)?
It's the false Edomite jews living in Israel. They're the anti-christ.

the other day I watched Cromwell, movie from the 1970, even if has some historical liberties very good film. The Cromwell depicted was such a chud through the ages that made me kek several times, like the church one and when he got triggered by the queen'd portrait, KEK
So we are going to a commonwealth 2.0 bringbongs?

>>512984616
I know what you're saying but the bible says that many anti-christs have come but THE anti-christ will stand in the holy place.

You'd also think God would say "they" and not "he" and "his".

>>512984756
In any case Trump is not nearly popular enough to be loved by the world. Nor Charles.

>>512984002
You do not know the way

>>512984698
Cromwell let the Jews back into England

>>512984809
It doesn't say the anti-christ is popular in the bible. It says he wins kings over with flatteries (trumpty drumpty likes to tickle people's assholes with his tongue). It says he confirms a covenant with many. It doesn't say anything about being loved or popular. It says he forces people to take the mark and that some people won't take it.

Thinking about that logically, why would anyone resist something he mandated if he was universally loved?

>>512982915
Getting cucked is part and parcel of being royalty though.

>>512984950
> It doesn't say the anti-christ is popular in the bible
Yes it does. It says only " The Elect " or Christians will be able to recognize what he is everyone else will be enamored.

>>512985097
No it doesn't say he's popular. Open biblegateway now and post any verse that says he's popular, I'll come back in a while to check after I eat supper.

>>512985026
Now there are two of them!

>>512978965 (OP)
I am not sure if I would put up a Trump photo, if he asked me nicely I might, it would be weird. The King should be different, just a neutral figure who is supposed to represent something like The Soul of Britain.

Maybe the painting is too much but I can't believe these hateful comments. He's just a man he can be judged by anyone but anyone can make mistakes. You should support your King because he represents you as a British person.

>>512985157
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2013%3A4&version=KJV

>>512983910
What does it mean here?

>>512985097
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024%3A24&version=KJV

>>512985097
>>512985379
It's hard to believe that anyone could be universally popular when people have so many mutually exclusive, strongly held opinions.

>christcucks take over another thread with their retarded prophecies
Good goy.

>>512985291
That verse doesn't say he's popular. It means they bowed to him.

The mark is given out under threat of beheading. Nobody is going to be popular if they threaten to cut your family's head off.

You are simply attributing something to the anti-christ that isn't there. "Who can make war with him" doesn't mean "wow I love this guy he's so powerful". It means "oh shit".

Furthermore, how can he be universally loved if 1/3 of the Earth doesn't love him? Silly sausage.