>>512996824 (OP)
>Trump intends to sell Alaska to end the Ukraine war.
If Trump gives Putin any of Alaska, this is an act of Treason. Congress needs to stop this. CC:
@RepThomasMassie
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1955778650579857646
Your concern about the potential transfer of U.S. land or resources to Russia touches on serious legal and political issues. Let’s break it down in light of U.S. law on treason and the context of economic sanctions and Russia’s status.
### Treason Under U.S. Law
Treason is narrowly defined in **Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution** and **18 U.S.C. § 2381** as:
- Levying war against the United States, or
- Adhering to its enemies, giving them **aid and comfort** within the U.S. or elsewhere.
- **Requirements**: A conviction requires two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. The act must involve clear intent to betray the U.S.
### Conclusion
While transferring Alaskan land or resources to Russia could theoretically be construed as treason if it’s proven to aid an enemy with intent to harm the U.S., there’s no evidence in the provided sources that Trump plans to do this. The Alaska summit focuses on Ukraine-Russia peace talks, with no indication of ceding U.S. territory. Economic sanctions and Russia’s adversarial status heighten suspicions, but treason requires clear intent and overt acts, which are not currently substantiated. If you’re concerned about specific claims or want to explore related laws (e.g., sanctions violations), let me know, and I can dig deeper.[](
https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/trump-suggests-a-land-swap-between-russia-and-ukraine-which-areas-could-change-hands-13923993.html)[](https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5443914-trump-putin-peace-talks/)