>>513120582
>Communism is an ideology.
Yes, an evil ideology. Such-as you're claiming about the Trump administration's policies, retard. I note how funny it is that you leftists have made excursions preaching the opposite for years, that somehow ideologies and words could be "evil."
>It's debatable whether or not a bunch of people died because they thought they were implementing communism or because they knew they were implementing authoritarianism and consolidated power.
"It's debatable whether or not someone is boiling water or applying heat to a contained volume of dihydrogen monoxide!"
The way you want to word it doesn't matter, because it's an ideology that got millions of people killed, more-so than any other idea. If you want to argue the specifics, we can talk all day about how Communism inherently creates exploitative authoritarian regimens by design, but I'd rather move on to the next point.
>Took me a second to figure out why you were even talking about this (...) My point here was that evil is a deontology of action
Ah, the signature pompousness of the left, "it's not that you disagree with my point, you just don't understaaand it!"
Your analogy still sucks, though. In your example, the committed act of evil is still arguably determined by the results. That baby is unaware it's been stolen from, but in the end its property has been taken, and its calories have been depleted. You're not arguing philosophy, you're arguing semantics.
Sidenote: say "ethics" next time instead of busting out the thesaurus just so the self-defining nature of your argument becomes as apparent to you as it does the rest of us.
>Maybe if you ask nicely I can equip you with enough basic information (...)
"I can totes explain it, but I won't!"
You have zero idea what the fuck you are trying to argue, and you're doing a poor job at hiding it.
Let me present a question: there were antifa members who attacked boomers in 2016 with bike locks outside of Trump rallies. Are they evil?
