← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 513174803

18 posts 8 images 5 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513174803 [Report] >>513174859 >>513176565 >>513176736
A Question
I would like to ask a question

Just one single question

Don't mind me, I'm just asking a question
Anonymous !niqjediPCA (ID: ae40zJ8m) United States No.513174859 [Report] >>513175346
>>513174803 (OP)
bill gates, i'd guess...
Anonymous (ID: 1Dbhp1gF) United States No.513174950 [Report] >>513175226
Gary was the best on Computer Chronicles. He knew his stuff.
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513175226 [Report] >>513175935
>>513174950
Yep

And I guess that's all there is to his story

Nothing more to see here, folks
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513175346 [Report] >>513176505 >>513177983
>>513174859
Oh, perish the thought

I'm just asking a question
Anonymous (ID: 1Dbhp1gF) United States No.513175935 [Report] >>513176109
>>513175226
"Some bikers" got into a scuffle with him and "he fell" right?
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513176109 [Report] >>513176169
>>513175935
"Yep"

"That's it entirely"
Anonymous (ID: 1Dbhp1gF) United States No.513176169 [Report] >>513176319 >>513176797
>>513176109
Back in the '60s, '70s, even the '80s. You could get one guy who created some real paradigm shifting stuff. You can't do that any more.
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513176319 [Report] >>513176501
>>513176169
Actually, you CAN do that still, but just not with just one guy -- you would have to pyramidize the work, with one guy having the broad-strokes agenda, and then he subdivides the specifics of implementation into more and more specific layers beneath him
Anonymous (ID: 1Dbhp1gF) United States No.513176501 [Report]
>>513176319
Nah that's not right either. The problem is the market is ossified and new ideas aren't allowed into the workplace for fear of paralytic retraining. Now many workers will be made redundant. No need to make TPS reports by hand or even have a Big Data Scientist to ingest and excrete from data lakes.

Computers becoming something for hobbyists is really going to be possible. FPGA technology gives small operations and even individuals the chance to make something in small numbers that would be impossible without a big run of chips...

Amiga will come back big. Turbo ultra Amiga.
Anonymous !niqjediPCA (ID: ae40zJ8m) United States No.513176505 [Report] >>513177983
>>513175346
and im giving you a fucking answer, moron.
Anonymous (ID: gNQRMdVo) United States No.513176565 [Report]
>>513174803 (OP)
wait

if gary
>killdall

then how come he's dead?
Anonymous (ID: jMe879C0) United States No.513176736 [Report] >>513177183 >>513178776 >>513178896
>>513174803 (OP)
When Kildall died, Gates had long won the OS battle and had nothing to fear from DRI. Gary liked high risk toys and though he was an affable person, like many nerds he didn't know when to keep his mouth shut. No idea if the biker explanation is correct or not but it's not unreasonable to think he may have said the wrong thing to someone wearing different leathers, not realizing that they would take it differently than the tech boys at the office would.
It might have been his love of flying to cost him the IBM deal, as he was out flying his personal airplane when IBM came to meet with him about using CP/M. He let his wife handle the negotiations with IBM and she got autistic over not wanting to sign a standard NDA. Gary also wanted a far higher licensing fee than Gates did. Microsoft winning the primary contract had more to do with Bill's mommy serving on the United Way board with the head of IBM than any weirdness with Kildall. IBM still licensed CP/M, but only as a secondary OS. Few picked CP/M because the license was so much more expensive.
>But QDOS
Yeah, that guy kind of got fucked but never would have made a deal with IBM himself and likely would have gone out of business like the other hundred or so makers of boutique operating systems. Also he's the one that doomed us all to use the non-standard backslash, so fuck him.
Anonymous (ID: jMe879C0) United States No.513176797 [Report] >>513177183
>>513176169
Greetings friend!
Anonymous (ID: 1Dbhp1gF) United States No.513177183 [Report]
>>513176736
CP/M was already well established too, the more you look at it the more you see a Bill Gates and his mom plot, with IBM of course, to steal the entire personal and office market. CP/M was cross platform and portable programs which could run on different architectures were easy on it.

>>513176797
He's a good guy.
Anonymous !niqjediPCA (ID: ae40zJ8m) United States No.513177983 [Report]
>>513175346
>>513176505
other than bill gates, that is.....
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513178776 [Report]
>>513176736
>Few picked CP/M because the license was so much more expensive.

Gee -- and who set the price for the CP/M option? It was IBM that did that.

https://youtu.be/JBX70SW7p20?si=6aATkaOCTXelM16h&t=5418
Anonymous (ID: 9sKCBFJe) United States No.513178896 [Report]
>>513176736
>Few picked CP/M because the license was so much more expensive

But, wait, there's more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZtD_4CWqiU