Thread 513176513

>China's reserve margin has never dipped below 80%–100% nationwide, meaning it has consistently maintained at least twice the capacity it needs, Fishman said. They have so much available space that instead of seeing AI data centers as a threat to grid stability, China treats them as a convenient way to “soak up oversupply,” he added.

>That level of cushion is unthinkable in the United States, where regional grids typically operate with a 15% reserve margin and sometimes less, particularly during extreme weather, Fishman said.

It is over for the US. If only your society was based on improving your country instead of scamming and pocketing the money of your fellow man.

>>513176513 (OP)
whypipro was in caves when china discovered electricity

China has an unreal amount of excess production and it's causing the greatest deflation event in human hisotry.

>>513176513 (OP)
https://energyandcleanair.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CREA_WaterRock-Energy-Economics_Resolving-near-term-power-shortages-in-China-from-an-economic-perspective_06.2023.pdf

I see (because i'm not squinting)

If they are producing more than they consume then they are inefficient and are wasting money.

>>513177519
Like the US good consumption?

>>513177572
Fucking food, reeeee

Why don't US do this?

>>513177793
Because we're heavily lobbied by the oil industry. We want to war for them and quickly forgot. The White House was going solar until Reagan reversed course.

>>513176513 (OP)
This article is very funny, and ignores the coal issue the chinks have. It suggests that the author has read a propaganda press release and has no actual understanding of the problem with electricity and datacenters. Also China's grid is routinely clowned on by FUCKING PNG which is hilarious.

>>513176513 (OP)
Improving infrastructure like power grids is communism, which is literally what China is.
Freedom (TM) demands potholes and brownouts.

>>513178098
Shouldn't have gone anti-nuclear.

>>513176513 (OP)
China
>be the factory of the world
>we need more energy
>more solar, more wind,more wave, more nuclear, more coal, more oil,more batteries.
>subsidize it.
USA
>turbine hurt birds
>no subsides for energy sorry.
>we want just coal


it's so over.

>>513180239
I read some libshit faggot try to justify their anti-nuclear stance with the argument that nuclear wasn't "scalable", as if fucking wind farms are