Anonymous
(ID: IF9uTVBl)
8/16/2025, 8:27:45 AM
No.513180853
>>513182704
>>513182824
>>513182828
>>513182851
>>513183055
>>513183061
>>513184885
>>513185247
>>513185673
>>513185727
>>513185906
>>513185998
>>513189109
>>513189348
Women are unnecessary.
I believe that civilization does not need women at all, matters of reproduction aside. Every single aspect of life and civilization is a male endeavor. Physically and mentally, men seem to be superior in every way that matters. Fathers even raise children better, as they outperform mothers consistently in ensuring good life outcomes for their offspring. Children who grow up without fathers suffer negative long-term consequences. There is no similar effect found in children who grew up without mothers. The average man is slightly more intelligent than the average woman by around 5 IQ points. Women are less likely to be geniuses, too. For every Marie Curie, there are hundreds of men at roughly the same level. I've tried for a long time to find evidence for women's necessity, but failed. We don't need them for traditionally feminine roles. Not as mothers, not as muses, not as nurses, and certainly not as artists or musicians. Will we need them for social cohesion? No. Men tend to form very cohesive groups without women. This is why across history they have formed warring parties, armies, structures, philosophies, and even entire societies with little to no input from women. And, if or when (male) scientists discover an artificial path to reproduction that does not require women, women will be phased out. I don't care that they are "cute" or "look nice." None of that matters. No matter how attractive a particular woman might be, I can't look at her with anything but disgust.