Thread 513180896

AI should replace lawyers, judges, and even politicians.

>>513180896 (OP)
Who's AI?

>>513180923
AI Sharpton

it will, among other things

>>513180944
Dat nigga owes me fiddy bucks

>>513181035
Ohh yeah? U fidda bin bout botta nigga!?

>>513180896 (OP)
Al Bundy?
He had a hawt daughter

>>513181103
Gun run da fade on unc, believe dat

>>513180896 (OP)
and it will. You know who the AI will never replace? The owners.

>>513180896 (OP)
AI is not that good, do you faggots even use it. It's retarded and wrong often. You want that as your lawyer?

>>513181234
>It's retarded and wrong often
so just like real lawyers

>>513181204
>I shagged ya mum behind a shrub in Nice, back in '44. She rang last week, for old times' sake.

>>513180896 (OP)
Lawfag here
AI isn't even close to being ready for this. It's not even as good as Boolean searches on Westlaw yet

>>513181234
>AI dOes'T iMprOve

>>513180896 (OP)
They should, and they will. The establishment is trying to make you fear AI taking your jobs, because they know that it will take their jobs too. But they don't let on to that.

>>513180996
You think corporate overlords will allow for decent sex/waifu bots? No way, they will log any wrongthink (let alone an attempt to have sex) like all the other personal devices. If it gets too bad, like having a negative facial expression upon news of trillions of AIPAC donations, we will be send to realignment, where drugs and AI gigabrainwashing will fry our brains.

>>513181204
That will probably include politicians and some judges and lawyers of "importance". I saw a chart where one of the AI bros rated himself as thinking one million times more than a highschooler. That's the level of delusion. In reality, he probably couldn't beat said high school kid in basic mental arithmetics.

>>513181497
>That will probably include politicians
of course. But not the owners.
>and some judges
all of them

but only an owner can replace another owner.