considering that
1. Alaska is much closer to Russia than the US (just 4 km to Russia according to Putler)
2. Alaska was previously Russian
3. Alaska got acquired for a disproportionately unfair price
4. Russia helped the US gain its independence by sending ships. If Russia helped the Brits instead the US would be a dystopian UK colony now. No one would even know what is speech and right to bear arms.
considering all that would it be fair to say that if NATO takes Kaliningrad it would only be fair that Russia takes Alaska /pol/?
2. Alaska was previously Russian
3. Alaska got acquired for a disproportionately unfair price
4. Russia helped the US gain its independence by sending ships. If Russia helped the Brits instead the US would be a dystopian UK colony now. No one would even know what is speech and right to bear arms.
considering all that would it be fair to say that if NATO takes Kaliningrad it would only be fair that Russia takes Alaska /pol/?