Thread 513213617

If Russians are somewhat Mongolic, this means their veins course with the blood of Genghis and his generals. Genghis Khan is the most successful man who ever lived by any measure. He even has tens of millions of direct descendants alive today, meaning he won the evolutionary-reproduction game too.
No conqueror in history ever came close to Genghis's achievements. His empire was like five times the size of any other empire carved out by a conqueror, and it straddled advanced kingdoms across Eurasia and it started with a few hundred thousand nomads living in tents.
This record is unmatched. Genghis is history's strongest man by ten light years at least.
If the Russians share his blood and genes, and the blood and genes of his top commanders, then this only makes Russians superior to other whites who do not have this admixture, just as steel is far superior to iron due to a bit of added carbon.

oh this thread again

>>513213684
>>513213617 (OP)
THIS
WHITE SUBHUMANS SEETHE AND COPE HAHAHAHAHH

>>513213617 (OP)
imagine having a country that size and still being mid and powerless

>>513213617 (OP)
Looks impressive until you realize >90% of russia is uninhabitable

chinkoid cope
genghis khan never conquered europe, only mongol achievment was sacking baghdad and destroying abbasids. moment they entered europe they got btfod by polechads

>>513213746
Anyone wearing nose strips publicly should be summarily executed.

>>513213918
They destroyed Georgia and everything from Novgorod to Kiev in the First Invasion.
Sure later the Europeans got their head up their ass and actually learned how to fight and they held him abit better - but they still made it all way to Poland.

>>513213684
It's a significant topic. Many white nationalists, of whom I am one but in a different way than many others, are Nordicists who despise Slavs in general and, sometimes, Russians most of all. Even opponents of Nordicism who are also white nationalists but who defend Mediterranean peoples and civilization, or even say Mediterranean civilization is superior, at least for most of history, to northern European societies, will often also look down on Slavs.
Many white nationalists don't like to count Slavs, especially Russians (since they're the easternmost Slavs) as white. They call Slavs, especially Russian, Mongol rape babies, Slavshits, Asiatic hordes etc.
The reason I made this thread, and I've only made it once before about a week ago (I'm not spamming it everyday like some people do with their threads), is to point out that even though Slavs have non-white admixture, that doesn't make them subhuman or nonwhite. In fact, most Germans have Hunnic (also Central Asian) admixtures, and the Hunnic DNA extends, in lesser portions, up into Scandinavia and into Western Europe.
The Aryan Invasion theory, in its original form, says that Europeans are descendants of Central Asian warrior cultures similar to the Mongols (light cavalry armies relying heavily on horseback archery as their most famous battlefield trait). There definitely was an invasion into Europe thousands of years ago, over the course of centuries, by Aryans/Indo-Europeans. How much DNA the Aryans left behind in Europe, and therefore to what extent modern Europeans are genetically Aryans, is debatable, and it could be true that the Aryans left only a little DNA in Europe's populations and their main contributions to Europe were cultural, like the Indo-European/Aryan language that most European societies speak.

>>513213617 (OP)
>If the Russians share his blood and genes, and the blood and genes of his top commanders, then this only makes Russians superior to other whites who do not have this admixture, just as steel is far superior to iron due to a bit of added carbon.
Russians don't share much of their genes. Ethnic Russians are genetically European.

If you plot the genetic distance, Russians are as close to Mongolians as they are to Ethiopians. There are 700 ethnicities, with the closest being Europeans, that are genetically closer to Russians than Mongols.

>>513214072
They didn't destroy Novgorod and a variety of other north, north-western and western cities were also spared

>>513213617 (OP)
tamerlame (also a mongol) was kinda successful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no9wPTWytis

>>513214392
[continued] Still, many Aryan Invasion proponents, or those who say that the Aryan Invasions are a major reason for European uniqueness and greatness, also say, very strongly, that the Aryan genetic admixture that has existed in European peoples for a few millennia now is the reason for European uniqueness and greatness. If this is true, and some contribution of DNA from Central Asian steppe warrior raiding populations is the reason behind European superiority, then this also means that Russians particularly, and Slavs in general, who also have noticeable Central Asian admixture, are at least as blessed by that DNA contribution as non-Slavic, more western European populations (Nordics, Celts/Brits, and Mediterraneans. It stands to reason, that if Aryan genetics is the main reason for European superiority, that having even more Aryan genetics makes a population even better, and since Slavs evidently have more Aryan DNA than more westerly European peoples do, then Slavs should be the greatest Europeans of the four main divisions of the European races: Nordics, Celts, Mediterraneans, and Slavs.
So, my ultimate point, is that white nationalists who disparage Slavs for having Central European genetic admixture are being hypocritical at worst, just ignorant at best. There is no good reason to believe Slavs are less than other Europeans due to racial/biological differences. Germanics and some Scandinavians already have Central Asian, especially Hunnic, DNA, and the disparagers of Slavs don't even mention this and many don't seem even to know or acknowledge this fact.
Basically, my point is all white/European peoples have some foreign genetic admixture, and this does not makes them non-white or less white just by itself. In fact, this non-European, Central Asian admixture is held up by many white nationalists as the primary reason lying behind the superiority and incomparable success of white civilizations. So it is odd that Slavs having such admixture becomes

>>513215043
[continued] a reason to discount Slavs in general by saying they are non-white or less white, and therefore significant inferior to other or proper whites.

>>513214592
That's a good point, and I also have no reason to disbelieve even the details in what you said.
My main target in this thread is the crowd, mainly Nordicists, who despise Slavs, frequently say they are not white or not Europeans, and that Slavs are too heavily Central Asian to count as white people. In this thread I am taking on some major flaws in their reasoning.

>>513215540
I couldn't take the screenshot since it was too far down the list. Mongol_Xinjiang is the 707th match to Russian. Kazakh is the 621st match.
There are differences between Russian culture and Western European culture. Nevertheless ethnic Russians are primarily of European genetic ancestry and not central Asian.

>>513213918
The Mongols defeated the Poles though.
https://youtu.be/BEsyRYnAcOw?t=1990
The Poles only deluded themselves that they won
https://youtu.be/BEsyRYnAcOw?t=2705

The Russian people were able to free themselves from the Mongol Yoke ~3 centuries later.
https://youtu.be/BEsyRYnAcOw?t=2628

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClcbdD-YUU8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4-KOzD0DHs

>>513216081
I agree with all that, and it is very interesting and significant information to have. Thank you.
My larger point here is that the Aryan Invasion theory is off the mark, at least in most of its version.
The oldest version strongly implies or even says outright that Aryan warrior peoples conquered and then replaced the native populations of Europe some 3000 to 4000 years ago. This idea goes at least back to the 1800s and was very popular in the late 1800s. The gist of this version of the Aryan Invasion theory is that the Aryans came into Europe and, from then on, the peoples of Europe have been Aryans, as though the Europeans populations that had been evolving in Europe for tens of thousands of years, at the least, somehow vanished. This case is similar to the 19th century versions of the Anglo-Saxon invasions of Britain during the collapse and aftermath of the western part of the Roman Empire. Many 19th century English historians, and many folks after their time, strongly implied or even overtly believed that the English are Germanic, even biologically, meaning that the Celts of Britain were either replaced by the Anglo-Saxons or mostly killed off and a bit of Celtic admixture has remained among the English.
That theory, and the Aryan Invasion theory, has been revised, especially in recent decades. No doubt there were invasions of Europe by Aryan/Indo-European peoples, and that's why most European languages for the past few millennia have been Indo-European languages. But it is more commonly believed, now, that the Aryans, at most, contributed significant amounts of DNA to the native European race that evolved in Europe, as far as the Aryans' genetic contributions to Europe, but more importantly, the Aryans bequeathed to Europe their language(s) and religions and perhaps some other cultural software like a strong warrior tradition. I think this version of the Aryan Invasions' effect on Europe is much more plausible than the replacement theory.

>>513217486
[continued] Really, Europeans are not, biologically, Aryans, but instead we comprise a general European race that evolved over at least tens of thousands of years in Europe. When we talk of European genetics, we are talking, almost always, about this native European race, not some Aryan race from Central Asia. Our biological traits stem almost entirely from Europe and our evolution in Europe, things like light hair, light eye colors, a taller stature, higher intelligence and perhaps also our creativity is genetic (though there are definitely cultural factors in European societies that have allowed European populations to be especially creative compared to peoples of other regions of the world, and if our high creativity is ultimately genetic, then our cultures have largely enabled that genetic potential to be actualized during our history), and perhaps even the aquiline nose is a genetic European trait.