>>513259804
You said you wouldn't use one because of two excuses:
>1. It's too much effort for you to find one
>2. You'd have more eggs than you could eat so a lot of them would expire
1. it's a thought experiment; invalid excuse
2. implies you would take all the eggs rather than leave any, even if most of them expire in your fridge - your *excuse* is actually saying YES, you WOULD take all the eggs.
Then immediately after these two excuses you say,
>yes I will use it as much as I need.
>They are a globohomo corporation (you don't know this) therefore I'm justified taking as much as I want (you don't say why)
And the point of this is to consider that in civilization, we may actually decide NOT to take as much as we need. We might take less than we need, so someone else with less also gets something they need. This is what keeps your tribe strong. It's what civilization is ABOUT.
In my opinion, you're an animal.
You would pull your hand out of the pain box
You would not put your shopping cart away
You would take all the eggs from the farmer's stand without paying
That is what you have revealed yourself to be from your responses. You can disagree all you like, you made it very clear several times over what your actual behaviour and preferences are, and you either need to come to grips with that (cope, so to speak) and change the way you think, or just continue being the subhuman animal that you are.