Thread 513299065

Why didn't she ever speak up when her country was being ruined?

>>513299065 (OP)
she oversaw the destruction of the British Empire when she could have easily intervened. She should be viewed in the same way as Yeltsin. An American bootlicker.

The dismantling of the British Empire was on the same level as the fall of the Soviet Union

>>513299343
FUCK I MEANT GORBACHEV

>>513299065 (OP)
Was Thin Lizzy a good band?

>>513299343

yep!
because she WAS the ruiner.

Her indicator for trouble was whether or not she had to dress herself. As long as she had at least half a dozen people to pick out her clothing and put it on for her, things were splendid.

>>513299065 (OP)
Do you remember what happened to her uncle?

>>513299446
>>513299512
The thing that made us so great was also our downfall. Our monarchy.

>>513299065 (OP)
Traitor to Europe. Evil woman.

>>513299621
If only she had been more like the previous Queens of England who were all unfathomably based. She wasn't for some reason.

>>513299065 (OP)
Too drunk to care.

>>513299343
She could have made a go at it but the bankers would have intervened and removed her from the throne.

>>513299750
What was a "based" Queen of England?

>>513299798
I would have at least dissolved parliament and declared absolute power like old times

Why is she wearing a green screen?

>>513299897
Every queen of england

1. Matilda (1141):
She was the daughter of Henry I and claimed the throne after her father's death, but her reign was short-lived. according to history websites
2. Lady Jane Grey (1553):
Named queen by Edward VI's will, her reign lasted only nine days before Mary I took the throne.
3. Mary I (1553-1558):
Known as "Bloody Mary" for her persecution of Protestants, she was the daughter of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon.
4. Elizabeth I (1558-1603):
Daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, her reign is often considered a golden age in English history.
5. Mary II (1689-1694):
Ruled jointly with her husband, William III, after the Glorious Revolution.
6. Anne (1702-1714):
The last Stuart monarch, she oversaw the Act of Union that created Great Britain.
7. Victoria (1837-1901):
Her reign was the second longest in English history, and it saw the British Empire expand significantly.
8. Elizabeth II (1952-2022):
She was the longest-reigning British monarch and a global icon.

>design system that is purpose built to strip the aristocracy of any power
>it gets dominated by god awful treasonous midwits
>HELP ME ARISTOCRACY!!!! WHY ARENT YOU EXECUTING THE TRAITORS!!!!!!

>>513299794
That was her mother.

>>513299935
I’m up to speed on the power plot of how the world actually works but I can’t pin any consistent ethos on the royal family or QEII. I know she called Israelis terrorists so that’s one data point but I’m not sure how far that goes into muzzie loving. Maybe too far.

>>513300150
The more I live life the more I understand homeless junkies

>>513300208
British history runs deep. Almost as deep as the rest of world history combined. We basically did everything.

>>513299065 (OP)
Which country?

>>513299065 (OP)
she wasnt in position to speak up
she had corporate control and nothing of the higher jurisdiction

>>513300425
I really need to read more into pre 19th century British history. Kind of embarrassed to admit I have barely more than a cursory understanding.

>>513300614
It's probably in your ancestry. It gets really good before England unifies into one country

>>513300208
Muzzies were quite happy pretending to just be pakis until the rape scandal kicked off.

>>513300062
Victoria was a worthless hag that did nothing and went full bitch neet after her betabuxx husband died.
Anne ended her bloodline.
Elizabeth ended her bloodline entirely.

All women are trash. And the monarchs are inbred rodents.

>>513300425
I think it's fair to say that for 1066-1956. But world history spans a lot wider.

>>513299065 (OP)
>her country
She once said something to the effect that she has no interest in party politics as her family are from something much older. She was perfectly aware that their world is not national but is oligarchical.

>>513299065 (OP)

Shes a puppet.
If the royal fmaily cause a problem, they just die in their sleep and we establish a new dynasty.

Its happened all throughout history. They have to obey

>>513299512
>>513299798

This.

Not to mention the United Kingdom was severely indebted to the Jewnited States after the war, and not before Churchill driving the empire into the ground..

>>513300425
You were great once, but ww1 was the beginning of the end. How thing would have turned out if you hadn't gotten involved.

>>513300700
British/Welsh/Scottish/Irish/Russian and no other nations in the bloodline going back to the early 1700s in Canada. Grandma still kept in touch with the Welsh side several generations removed. We did the Lambs rum on fire English pudding singing come all ye faithful at Christmas.

I’ve hit the surface of the major events. Going to finish the Caesar’s Gallic/Civil Wars then Xenophon, then into 600-1800 Britain and it’s going to take years.

>>513300795
The best part is before 1066 my nigger

>>513300425
You also helped kikes cement their foothold more than anyone, while gleefully twisting treaties and betraying deals.

Perfidious Albion.

>>513300754
From what I gather the leadership of the muzzie countries have actually said you shouldn’t do this these people are our trash.

>>513301235
Don't worry there are plenty of extremely autistic gentleman historians from the 1800s who compiled the entire history into one book. I would recommend starting there.

>>513299065 (OP)
The royals aren't British so they don't give a shit about Britain.

>>513301311
In fact if we were to despose of the trash radical muslims in the UK the muslim world would thank us for it.

>>513299065 (OP)
because she was the one ruining it

>>513301493
"The History of England" by David Hume.

>>513299065 (OP)
The english morarchy lost its power long before her birth.

>>513299065 (OP)
She's German and could not care less what happens to the Anglos.

>>513299065 (OP)
Remember the last time the Monarch in Britain actually had power and ruled unconditionally?
Yeah Charles I's head remembers it fondly.

And if some other Monarch thinks about doing the same, his head will share the stake with Charles I

Britain's fine and She was a ceremonial and symbolic head of state which must remain politically neutral to maintain public trust across all sides of politics.

>>513299065 (OP)
Her empathy was exploited.
She lived through WWII. Some good-hearted may think she wanted peace and she fell for globalist propaganda.

But they forget: She's part of the club.

Would she have married Prince Philip if she didn't believe in the same elitist things that he believed? She was a globalist.

>>513301908
Pogroms are coming. You'd better get back to your shithole while you still can.

>>513299065 (OP)
She's on the Epstein list

what american's don't realise is that that the vast majority of brits don't give a fuck about the royal family and are well aware that they have a "symbolic" role in the state and nothing more. They're a glorified tourist attraction.

as far as a i can see their main function over the past 4 decades has been to provide content for tabloid newspapers. they're trashy as fuck.

They're an expensive farce that only exist because Cromwell pussied out.

>>513299065 (OP)
It was her plan, her ambition. You see, she's not even British.

>>513301936
>She lived through WWII.
indeed she did

>>513299065 (OP)
Because women should keep silent.

>>513301493
Hume? Took Classical history in university to 300 but not a lick of anything Britain. Read the wealth of nations in elementary but that’s about it for formal non fiction for the UK. Had a hint of the ‘tism for charts, last book spoke to the world that would evolve into Dickensian hell pits. The green nonsense today doesn’t seem so far out of place from the corn laws and various other crap rent seekers pretending to be capitalists demand from the state.

But which book gives a decent run down of from the Romans leaving to the corporate empire in full swing?

>>513299343
Anne Frank, age progression to 28yrs old.

Pro-British Edward 8th got run out of palace in a story that just don't add up, and his oddly Jewish looking younger bro replaced him, and suddenly the whole "royal family" becomes Jewish looking, and acting.

>>513302254
>what american's don't realise is that
She wasn't just Queen of England.

Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; 21 April 1926 – 8 September 2022) was Queen of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms from 6 February 1952 until her death in 2022. She had been queen regnant of 32 sovereign states during her lifetime and was the monarch of 15 realms at her death.

>>513301536
That really seems to be the case. I can’t make heads or tails of it minus the supremacist mafia jews being insane with a blackmail ring and hating western civilization. I suppose it could be that simple, look what the Sogdians and An Lushan did to China…

>>513300932
Churchill's American mother was so Jewish looking they invented a story she was "part (feather) Indian", since The Jews had been promoting that as kinda kool even the 1920s in Western movies.

>>513301245
I have my doubts

>>513301936
In some ways subversive globalism was/is one way for Britain to still be an empire. But to what end? Make everything shitty and brown? Why? Aside from the retard hoi polloi of non white countries no one wants that, it would be shit. Nukes going off and random bio weapon attacks as the disorganized third world has their few smarts toy with things they understand even less than we do.

>>513301715
Queen Liz had her appointed Gov Gen shit can the entire govt of Australia in the 1970s, and when they were allowed to come crawling back, minus a few key members, "White Australia" was gone and never spoken off, and suddenly they needed "skilled workers" like "hair dressers" from India, and Aussie cops went from being cool and laidback but bad ass, to being a special kind of shitty and petty.

>>513299065 (OP)
Oh come on she had no power and new she was on eggshells.

>>513303011
scots REALLY dont give a fuck about the royals

>>513302254
This. They don't have real power. And now Charles is really pushing it.

>>513301970
this, I remember hearing from a very old fuck from UK, in about 1970 when I was a wee lad, that the reason for keeping The Crown, VS like USA, was that The Crown held the power to step in not if, but when "democracy" got off the rails, and the Crown was the "safety" to save The People.

BTW, both Nick and Anglin were of the opinion that Liz II still "represented based values". Oh well, not everyone can be right all the time.

>>513299065 (OP)
Royals are the oldest kike race traitors. The English crown didnt kill Rothschild and steal his wealth instead they let that evil jew bloodline exist even after it deliberately fucked up the economy of England and tried to do the same to the american colonies.

>>513303369
The US, Canada, and Australia (not sure about NZ but probably them too) all lost our Euro primary immigration policies in the 1960s. It was completely acceptable to say we don’t want to import Asian cultural norms en masse and the spectacular population differences and potential for overrun were understood. That actually goes back to 1867 in Canada with John A saying BC can’t be full of Chinamen. It took 28 years (end of British HK) but the rot from that is the root of l the corruption speedrunning turning this place into India. Not sure if China planned that but bureaucrats and politicians getting used to taking money and orders from China made it possible. Having a deck built by a friend and them getting a casino license approved used to be a major scandal. Now our intelligence service states officially that MPs are working for the CCP and India. Nothing happens. Frankly after the air India bombing all non Euro immigration should have ended but neoliberals and likely something more nefarious demand Chinese, sub-continentals, or worse (Somalis).

https://thetyee.ca/Life/2013/05/13/Glen-Clarks-Deck/

>>513303532
She technically had Lowe but look what happened to Edward. I’m not sure if the third Reich was a banker plot or not but a lot of the people running it certainly didn’t believe so. Maybe a bit of an authoritarian gong show but when HASN’T Germany been like that? Ffs we all use Prussian brainwash education because it worked.

>>513303937
1812, they must have wanted that to happen. They could have straight up arrested Nathan and liquified his ill gotten assets. I imagine most of parliament lost their ass so who would have cared? That deep into proto lolbertism?

>>513304124
*the power

>>513304276
Nathans BS was before Democrapcy existed, the crown could have gone to the (((Bank of London))) kill every jew there and replace with their own ethnic loyalist but didnt, they stupidly allowed the jew to have ridiculous power.

>>513303945
You know what reading that again everyone involved failed up. We’ve been fucked for awhile. That said pretty hard to get anything done back then without the Italians in the east end on your side, particularly when they’re your neighbours. Not mob behaviour but uh, I’ll say quid pro quo. Drawling that line between getting things done and minor graft gets real sticky when inscrutable foreign states with unlimited money get involved. How do you even stop that without 100% financial and maybe even personal transparency of decision makers? They’ll get to the cops. Somehow CSIS still keeps blowing the whistle but nothing is done and they’re barred from naming names. Must be infuriating to be a Canadian glownigger. CIA and the FBI haven’t been 1/10 as honest about the state of compromised government officials from overseas. It’s fucked but at least the Israeli control is more or less completely in the open and admitted. Named CCP spies in the US sit in office. Ours would be gone tomorrow if the RCMP and CSIS had any real power. The PMO here is a raw dog dictatorship only kept in check by the one vote away from leaving confederation sovereign provinces.

>>513304573
Yeah I can’t argue. I do know enough about British history that the Saxe-Coburg Gotha’s aren’t British but I don’t see what that has to do with caving to jewish bankers. What disgusting bloodline wants to make their country, the place they own, a shithole run by coin clippers? I know I’m missing something. Maybe something gross with a secret esoteric religion like Nurgle. Medieval money larping as Roman senatorial lines (Medici, Rothschild, Warburg etc) definitely did shit like putting normies in cages for fun, worse than any Roman Emperor kind of depravity.

>>513299065 (OP)
A long, centuries long process of cucking the English royalty and transferring power to Parliament, kicked into hyperdrive when her father abdicated and then she lived like 70 fucking years as the Queen, nodding her head as ministers fucked over the kingdom, distracting her with tea parties and bullshit. The next King being a geriatric limp dick loser just seals the deal. The English Monarchy is fucking done.

>>513299065 (OP)
>Royals oppose Parliamentary politics
>Parliament consider a vote on abolishing the monarchy
Basically the Crown fears "the vote", and as the nation becomes browner that vote is more and more likely to vote aganst the Crown.

The Crown "could" try and rally the nationalists, but they'd rather just keep their heads down and avoid risking losing it all. By all, I mean their money and land.

>>513308395
Turning the country into a brown shithole seems like more of an existential threat than Napoleon or Hitler. Higher ups that aren’t concerned about cheap labour can’t seriously think thats not going to wreck the place. It’s deliberate, but why?