>>513309576
Immediately projecting your loneliness onto me the moment I mention the people in my life says more about you than it does me.
Again - you are most certainly autistic.
>>513309598
This is a bit of a mischaracterization but you almost got it, you're most of the way there.
Marx didn't believe that capitalism was doomed to fall to class revolution per say, but he believed that all epochs of class society were doomed to this fate, whether it be slave society, feudalism, capitalism, or whatever other socioeconomic epoch of human history; all of these epochs ended in a revolt by their social underclass - we have capitalism in the first place because the liberal nobility and serfs of feudal europe decided they didn't need the presence of their monarchies any longer, establishing a binary class system of capital owner and industrial worker in place of the feudal ternary class system of monarch, land owner, and agricultural worker.
Marx believed that society would inevitably revolt against this final form of class society, like how society revolted against all other socioeconomic epochs, but Marx believed that the binary nature of the capitalist system meant that the abolition of a ruling class would intrinsically create a single-class society, or more appropriately, a classless society.
>so no division of proletariat and "rich people",
Marx himself was rich, and specifically stated that he supported the existence of wealthy people - his Communist theories were centered around the abolition of wealth accumulation via labor exploitation in favor of wealth accumulation via labor
>and everything belonging "to the people"
Productive property belonging to the people, not all material goods.*
These ideas were the byproduct of Marx's philosophy, dialectical materialism, and his application of this philosophy to his historical studies.
Communism was the logical synthesis of Marx's ideas into a socioeconomic evolution.
TL;DR A bunch of bullshit that's been proven false