>>513317681 (OP)
>"Cities are bad" propaganda is ruining young men.
Kind of.
It's cool to need a breath of fresh air and go live in the country for a year or something. But one of the best things you can experience in life is living in a city - a real one, at least 500k population There's nothing that compares to it.
It's basically where young single people go.
Countless potential people to meet. Your social standing is only your social standing within one given circle, rather than the whole town. If someone doesn't like you, nobody else cares. In a small town, if someone doesn't like you, it gets half the town to agree to act like you're a pariah. Small town culture in general is suffocating like that.
The people who move to cities also tend to have more ambition in life. Not everyone in a small town sucks, but the people who do suck tend to be in small towns. Crabs in a bucket types who try to bring others down.
As for the politics, yes, cities are left wing. Who cares. Even in rural areas, the trendier towns are still left wing. You just avoid making politics your personality and you're fine.
Point is, the right gets it wrong on discouraging people to live in cities. Cities are where life happens. Everything significant in the world happens in cities. Suburbs are for raising children and rural places are for retirees and hermits.
>>513318038
>pay 3x for shit jobs constant noise and no comfort
The jobs pay more in a city and that's literally where all the good jobs are. Rent difference isn't that much more either, it depends on neighborhood. Suburbs and rural areas are often as or more expensive because there's less housing. As for the noise, cities feel more quiet and private because they have white noise and everyone minds their own business. In small towns, a truck hitting a pothole or someone shutting a car door down your block becomes a disturbance. In cities, the noise drowns out.