Thread 513328481

oh boy, a vaporware thread bros!

>>513328481 (OP)
Did they ever show off that drone mothership they were shilling back in June?

>>513328481 (OP)
The most destructive threat to the west is in fact BBC.

You lost because every amerimutt tv has NBC, ABC, FOX, CBS, CNN and PBS on it

>>513328481 (OP)
Rolling for NYC getting nuked first.

>>513330311
Nice.

>>513328481 (OP)
Ok, we can destroy one dam in china and it will kill more than the US has people.

>>513329271
of course not
but they just announced a vtol jet drone that will also not be unveiled in 2 months

>>513330115
>mutts law
Holy fuck the CIA/Mossad brain fucked people so badly lol

>>513328481 (OP)
If they can be remotely detonated, we will remotely detonate them.

>>513330235
CHING CHONG WLOOOOO YOU NAH NICE

>>513330453
As a coomer I've definitely noticed an increase in blacked porn in the last few years. It's so disgusting, I don't understand how anyone can get off to it.

>>513330651
>as a coomer
LOL, whats your definition for one being a coomer?

>>513330453
Well they could have made it any other color and avoided the obvious.

>>513330730
A male chronic masturbator.

>>513330994
What do you define as chronic?

>>513328481 (OP)
>>513330235
You Chinese niggers are retarded as fuck, now that we know it will be solutioned out of threat by some neet MIT think tank

>>513328481 (OP)
I just assume this is fake because it’s on city streets.

You would build this right on the waterfront. You also would have reasons to, you know, not want your enemies to know they exist.

>appear strong when you are weak

>>513328481 (OP)
You should move to china

>>513328481 (OP)
A little late to the party aren't we? Russia was pretending to have a UK and Ireland destroying nuclear torpedo back in the 2000s

>>513328481 (OP)
>WE
You're not one of us chink, Xi is dead cope and rope dog torturing subhuman.

>>513328481 (OP)
and what exactly stops us stealing this idea? If chinks can make it we can make it even more easily.

>>513332572
we can't, we don't have the rare earth tech

>>513328481 (OP)
Honestly with the whole notion about how flying drones have completely deprecated tanks, it makes sense that drone torpedoes could completely deprecate warships

>>513332619
>we can't, we don't have the rare earth tech
You seem to misunderstand why we don't have "rare-earth" tech. We can get it extremely easily.
Retard.

>>513328481 (OP)
Holy shit another 1pbtid wumao thread flew over my house!

>>513331030
I'd say like.. at least once a day, every day.

>>513328481 (OP)
>3,000 km depth
Who the hell falls for this kind of propaganda?

>>513328481 (OP)
Man it’s just like those drones, that were shown to immediately get btfo by an EMP. Gee I wonder if something like I don’t know sea mines could take care of this.

>>513330651
That's because you aren't a kike or a jeet.

>>513332758
So you’re saying that all white males are predisposed to enjoying BBC porn and all it takes is not resisting your urge to goon everyday to expose your true cvck desires?

Maybe that’s just you and your closeted energy bro

China have 500+ modern ballistic missiles very fast that can carry nuclear head and top tier satellite tech + around 500 gen 5 fighte jets


They are safe

>>513336129
pretty shitty reading comprehension youve got there potato nigger

>>513328481 (OP)
>3000km depth

Halfway to the planet core?

>>513332712
Why doesn't China use Chinese numbers?

>>513336416
>no argument
You’re transgender and you lost

>>513330453
both of your are shitskins

>>513328481 (OP)
>is dropped dormant
>has to be activated
What is the fucking point then? It's no different than their shitty submarines

something black and long

>um it's bay bay cee

why polcel like this?

>>513336883
The point is "WoooOOOOOOoooooo be afraid".

>>513337093
I'm absolutely quaking in my boots. My timbers are shivered. I will never recover from this.

>>513336795
you are very definitely the axe wound connoisseur here. worse for you, you are a nigger, not irish and have to go back

>>513328481 (OP)
oh no what will we do without California

>>513331517
It's bait to get a milfag to reveal specs of our underwater detection capabilities. Some with just enough access to clasified but possibly not entirely known yet information are dumb enough to dump in response to trolling

>>513336519
Propaganda works on the heart, not the mind.

>>513336747
>every nation puts their own shitty little scrip on their ships and every sailor in the world has to recognize every one at a glance
let's don't and say we did

>>513328481 (OP)

The ICBMs that would destroy every city in Russia after a nuclear attack aren't on the coast.

Mutually assured destruction still stands.

>>513328596
>oh buoy
fixd

>Dirty Bomb but for Water.
You all are retarded if you think ANY Country will be stupid enough to Radiation Poison THE WHOLE FUCKING OCEAN.

>>513328481 (OP)
LMAO. Eglintroons on suicide watch.
We eatin' good tonight, PLAchads.

>>513339098
>Radiation Poison THE WHOLE FUCKING OCEAN.
Bitch please. It wouldn't even be 1/1000th what Fukushima did.

>>513335907
>>513330651
>>513330453

yeah if you watch porn wtf is wrong with you, You have no imagination or drive to fuck women instead get off on cuck videos through a screen? Even the cuck gets to be in the room a porn watcher is even worse

>>513339284
Fall out settles down cause Gravity

Radiated Ocean water will keep spreading. OCEAN CURRENTS are a thing. water is not still.

>>513339487
You're retarded.
Thanks for letting us know.

>>513328481 (OP)
>CA, FL, NY, DC
Hey that's where most jews live! I don't oppose this. Make sure you mix some cobalt in with it for that extra kick.

>>513339284
and fukushima did not do shit,

>>513330651
Go look up the leaked videos where the guys who run the site say they are putting stuff in that people might not normally like. It has to do with tranny porn, but I think this might also be related

>>513339950
That's the point, numbnuts.
The radiation isn't the weapon, the nuclear-powered tsunami is.

I'm just pointing out that the ocean radiation would be negligible.

>>513340115
hay relax I was posting in agreement with you

>>513328481 (OP)
>3,000 km depth

>>513328481 (OP)
Babe wake up new chink wunderwaffen just dropped. Chinese jet at international air show when?

>>513339625
Fukushima "Dripped into the ocean" not "Lets blow a nuke in the middle of the ocean"
You clown.

>>513340115
a nuke would never make a tsunami thought, the energy would be dispersed evenly in all directions, you'd be wasting a billion weapon for a 3 foot wave. underwater nukes are a joke of a weapon no country would ever actually make

>>513340224
3 thousand THOUSAND meters depth. Per usual, OP is a faggot.

M.A.D is still in play.
If China used one of these, their nation would become an irradiated wasteland and the people would be nothing but shadows upon the pavement. That 3 Gorges Dam would get Castle Bravo'd.

>>513340458
one of those wouldn't even make a ripple at the beach

>>513340301
The US detonated literal hundreds of nukes in the ocean back in the 50s.

>>513340184
whoops, my bad.

>>513340305
Imagine this, but at the port of Los Angeles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWd2tcyDb4

>>513339625
Scary colors!!!!!

>>513328481 (OP)
Cool, and we launch our nukes at moscow, which they cannot stop, and now everybody is having a bad day. Nuclear brinkmanship and game theory is nigger tier.

>>513340593
Invading the ocean would have cost more soldier's lives than nuking it.

>>513340593
wrong, wouldn't happen like that. water is 800 times denser then air. The USA post powerful nuke displaces air up to 9 miles. lets take the 9 miles in dived it down by 800. ack we get 56foot wide bomb if a nuke goes off under water

>>513328481 (OP)
>nukes baja
that chink went to american education too?
anyways land is far more vulnerable to invasion, especially with Canada speedrunning becoming a brown country

>>513340699
kek

>>513340724
>doesn't know the difference between "then" and "than"
yeah, going to just assume you're a dumbass.

>>513340632
Akuma and Elena becoming some what of a pairing just makes me smile

>>513340593
>The US detonated literal hundreds of nukes in the ocean back in the 50s.
>IN
At surface level depths (30 meters)

and the area still fucked
and was so fucked there is a whole treaty now about how to conduct nuclear testings

>>513328481 (OP)
>chinks nuke Los AnJewlos, San Kikecisco, and Jew York
>losing

Sounds like a fucking great idea to me.

>>513340787
>grammar fagging on 4chan
your the real dumbass here

>>513328481 (OP)

Just tell me some Hacker wont figure-out a way to launch one of those with a hydrophone?

https://i.imgur.com/Z5PwOPw.mp4

>>513340802
I see no reason why this thing couldn't detonate in the middle of San Francisco bay.
>Nice trillion dollar city you got there.

>>513340866
>grammar fagging
there's a reason people point out things like this.
if you couldn't pass 5th grade english, you probably don't understand the finer points of nuclear weaponry.

>>513340930
not everyone is native English speaker, how many languages do you speak?

>>513332572
>and what exactly stops us stealing this idea?
Because it would be redundant, you already have a larger nuclear submersible fleet than China. And despite crashing into a huge fucking rock once have never managed to lose one, unlike China who had one sink due to incompetence during construction.

>>513332619
We have more chemical and elemental tech than any other nation. You're retarded.

>>513340877
Most modern mass destruction weaponry is not about whether or not it can hit (IT CAN, defense technology is generations behind attack).

The "That Will be stupid" is what comes after
>political retaliation
>ACTUAL FUCKING RETALIATION/ MAD

"It can level down cities" Weapons are the reason why large scale wars dropped after WWII and you only now see regional conflicts or non nuclear powers involved.

>>513328481 (OP)
blah blah blah blah CHINEE MAN HAVE HUGE DING A RING AMELICAN AM STOOPID blah blah blah blah
Get back to us when you have results, Chang, not just more hype.

>>513341000
>not everyone is native English speaker
unless you came here to study physics, there's a good chance you know more about driving for Uber than the subject of this thread.
you sound Israeli, which means you probably know more about leeching money and doing hasbara than actual fighting.

>>513328481 (OP)
Oh no! Whatever will we do without our coastal elites?!

>>513341089
Been a lot of saber rattling from the US towards China lately.
Hopefully this will quiet it down some.

>>513330419
This, plus the US also has nuclear torpedoes.

>>513341166
funny if that is true why can you only argue my grammar and not my math. I only live in the USA part time and my work has nothing to do with the USA

>oh no
>200 foot coastal tsunami
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWd2tcyDb4

>>513341288
>doesn't deny being Israeli
China hasn't called it a tsunami device, that's just retarded journalists and retards like me.
The point is that either way it's a devastating weapon.

Again, imagine it going off in a major harbor.

>>513341213
thats the point, we are on the era of Political Warfare between the big players.

>>513341456
there would never be any point ever to detonate underwater, when you can do 800x more damage detonating overland, that is really the only point I'm trying to make

>>513341456
>Again, imagine it going off in a major harbor.
Yes a city will get destroyed.
then what?
Either china becomes a pariah, all trade gets blocked etc etc.
or said coastal City country responds in kind (MAD is a thing)

>>513341288
>and not my math.
>lets take the 9 miles in dived it down by 800.
That's retarded, displacement and density are in a non linear scale not even touching on the effect vaporization would have on density.

>>513341533
>there would never be any point ever to detonate underwater
The obvious appeal is the stealth.
We have pretty sophisticated missile defenses, but our ports are completely unprotected.

>>513341632
>or said coastal City country responds in kind (MAD is a thing)
you and what navy?

1. you don't drive your superweapon exposed in the middle of big cities in broad daylight
2. underwater superweapons are easy to detect, which is why all american torpedoes and subs have their propellers covered
3. huge, big SLOW torpedoes are useless when the sub carrying them is equally slow and useless too

Ukraine has already shown small, lightly armed fast attack submarines work better. It's how Ukraine sunk the Moskva and put at least one submarine back into Crimea's dry dock. Russia's navy doesn't work as the Kursk disaster demonstrated, and Putin made the wrong investments in 50s era weapons.

>>513341671
>but our ports are completely unprotected.
Other than the US's ability to track submersibles.

>>513341764
The US Navy, retard. Do you really think they'd let LA get nuked and not retaliate? Russia can't even stop a third world country.

>>513341764
>a country has ALL its navy in a single port town
Nigga think he is pulling a better Peal Harbor .

>>513341820
>Ukraine has already shown small, lightly armed fast attack submarines work better. It's how Ukraine sunk the Moskva
No it was a shore based anti ship missile.

>>513341820
>you don't drive your superweapon exposed in the middle of big cities in broad daylight
fleet week is a thing.
i've personally walked around on in-service navy ships.

when the point is deterrence, then yes, absolutely flashing your weapons makes sense.

>Ukraine simping
ah, it makes sense now.

>>513341894
Nigga thinks China makes only one of ANYthing

>>513341963
>i've personally walked around on in-service navy ships.
>superweapon
Nigger the USS Roosevelt is not a Superweapon.

Todd and Emil predicted this

>>513342051
I agree, but nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers are where we spend all our fucking money regardless.

>>513341963
>fleet week is a thing.
Not really, fleet week hasn't been a thing since the 80s because nobody watches it or cares. Even then, the US Navy doesn't display weapons when they're flying over SF and being annoying. Which is why SF has repeatedly tried to ban it because they don't want nuclear weapons in the city, although they weren't successful. Please note that nearby Berkeley was successful with their nuclear weapons ban so the fleet week festivities there ended. Though this was in the 70s.

>when the point is deterrence, then yes, absolutely flashing your weapons makes sense.
The point isn't deterrence, because Trump will press the button and kill people anyway. It does not make sense to completely expose your weapons to the enemy especially with Wagner's attempted coup considered.

>>513342124
>Not really, fleet week hasn't been a thing since the 80s
I went in San Francisco in 2022.

>>513342013
So your idea is that China will Nuke all USA Coastal Line at the same time??

1) Why
2) USA will still Vaporaize China out of the map if that happens

You are fucking Retarded.

"Display of power" are just that, Displays. no SANE country will use nukes or the equivalent in modern days cause there is nothing to gain

>>513342114
>but nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers are where we spend all our fucking money regardless.
Yes but expenditure doesn't make something a superweapon. Otherwise the VA is a superweapon.

>>513342221
This is probably more about China's MAD strategy than an offensive strategy.

>>513342230
>Otherwise the VA is a superweapon.
Hey now, the VA has killed more US soldiers than all of our enemies since WWII combined.

>>513342182
and 0 people showed up because it's annoying and SF is full of jeets now

>>513342319
>This is probably more about China's MAD strategy than an offensive strategy.
Which would be retarded as it only affects coastal territories and relies on their submarine fleet to be undetected around the continental US year round.

>>513328481 (OP)
quick, throw more money at the mic before we all dieeeeee

>>513342319
>MAD strategy than an offensive strategy.
that is retarded cause any nuclear country ALREADY have the best possible MAD strategy of modern tech, NUKES.

submerged nuclear threats have been a thing for over half a century. this is fear mongering

>>513342474
>relies on their submarine fleet to be undetected around the continental US year round.
This thing is reported to have a top speed of 30 kts and a runtime of 200 hours.
You don't need submarines when the torpedo can sail itself over from Guangzhou.

China's submarines suck anyway.

>>513340735
>nuke baja
our entire northern region is nearly Chicano tier-retarded, they could pass off themselves as mutts. The ruslimchinks would do us a favour if they nuked it as well

>>513342528
This is a nuke.
Just not one delivered by ICBM.

>>513342611
fair

>>513342619
which is even dumber. cause there is no better deliver method thant ICBM (besides black market smuggling but that is more Terrorism than "act of war")

>>513342604
>This thing is reported to have a top speed of 30 kts and a runtime of 200 hours.
Again that's retarded, as that would be highly detectable.

>>513342728
>there is no better deliver method thant ICBM
The fact that ZOG has been clamoring for war with China tells me they aren't scared of Chinese ICBMs for whatever reason.
If I had to guess, Elon's network of satellites serves some sort of dual function in a secret missile defense program.
They've only been funding research into missile defense tech since the Reagan years.

They are talking pretty loudly about war with China.

>>513342795
>Again that's retarded, as that would be highly detectable.
Yet the US has magical invisible nuclear submarines 100x this size that were designed back in the 70s?

>>513330115
I imagine the wallpaper at Eglin is just a repeating print of black penises.

>>513342871
>The fact that ZOG has been clamoring for war with China tells me they aren't scared of Chinese ICBMs for whatever reason.
this is like saying Chihuahuas have a secret weapons against pitbull.

again nigga, is all bark cause everyone know no sane country will ACTUALLY fire their nukes 1st unless they have a massive suicidal speedrun bet

>>513342914
>Yet the US has magical invisible nuclear submarines 100x this size that were designed back in the 70s?
Yeah they don't go at 30 KTS when running silent.

>>513342962
This thing seems like it would make a great tactical weapon, much moreso than a doomsday one.
>Carrier strike group sailing too close
>New artificial reef in the south China sea
No one would retaliate against China for addressing an obvious threat from uniformed military personnel.
It's nowhere near the same level of outrage they'd get from nuking a city.

>>513343093
Woah, crazy, wonder if this thing might have more than one speed too.

>>513343135
>Carrier strike group sailing too close
>New artificial reef in the south China sea
Sonar would pick it up.
>No one would retaliate against China for addressing an obvious threat from uniformed military personnel.
Americans sailing in international waters are not a threat to China and generally well received by Asian countries as the Chinese act like Niggers about the sea there.

And the bigger issue being that wouldn't matter as the US would have the right to retaliate.

>>513343170
>wonder if this thing might have more than one speed too.
Then the range is reduced.

>>513328481 (OP)
Imagine being so retarded you stop understanding how physics work. Nuclear torpedos do fuckall. That tsunami you are talking about? 5cm tall.

>>513343314
Whatever problems a nuclear submarine has to solve, the problems a torpedo has to solve are 100x easier.
There's a reason intelligent militaries are spending more on missiles than fighter jets these days.

There's a saying in the armed forces, "the last fighter pilot has already been born"

>>513343288
>Sonar would pick it up.
Probably best to pair it with some HSMs then.
Good thing China doesn't have tho- oh, wait.

>>513343288
>the US would have the right to retaliate.
With another artificial reef?

>>513343620
>the problems a torpedo has to solve are 100x easier.
No, unless it's navigatable it's a simple process to determine trajectory.
>Probably best to pair it with some HSMs then.
Then that's an open declaration of war.
>With another artificial reef?
With nuclear ordinance. And unprovoked nuclear attack would be justification.

>>513343712
>An unprovoked nuclear attack would be justification.

>>513343712
>unless it's navigatable
Nigga I can buy a remote control toy submarine for $20 on Amazon.

>Then that's an open declaration of war.
Yeah, sinking a carrier strike group would be like that.

>With nuclear ordinance
*ordnance.
And nuking a city full of civilians would be 100x more evil in the eyes of the world than sinking an obviously-hostile naval force.

>>513343828
>Nigga I can buy a remote control toy submarine for $20 on Amazon.
Cool, now there's a radio signal to track.
>And nuking a city full of civilians would be 100x more evil in the eyes of the world than sinking an obviously-hostile naval force.
Nigger the US's nuclear policy is not based on an international vote. Nor does China have a right to attack military equipment in international waters because they feel 'threatened'.

>>513343929
>Cool, now there's a radio signal to track.
lol good luck.

>>513343929
>Nor does China have a right to attack military equipment in international waters because they feel 'threatened'.
Nigger, China's defense policy is not based on international vote.

>>513328481 (OP)
A depth of 3000 kilometers huh?
That’s pretty impressive

>>513344023
>China's defense policy is not based on international law.
No, it's Freedom of navigation under UN law. China has ratified it but violates it frequently in regards to the south china sea.
>lol good luck.
Tracking a radio signal is extremely easy.

>>513328481 (OP)
You niggers are still playing checkers while we’re playing chess. We have literal earth quake weapons. We can cause fucking earthquakes. We are the masters of scientific advancement solely to kill more people. We have weather modification systems that can curve hurricanes (I think. The earthquake one is definitely real). Shove that empty pipe you call a torpedo up your yellow ass, chang

>>513344135
>China has ratified it but violates it frequently in regards to the south china sea.
There's your answer.
US violates international law and US law as a matter of national policy.
Supporting the Gaza holocaust, for example, violates the Leahy law and multiple international treaties.

Hell, the US' de facto recognition of the ROC violates the state department's official "One China" policy.

>>513328481 (OP)
>3000km depth
Subhuman detected

>screenshotting picrel
Another subhuman detected

>>513344550
>There's your answer.
You're advocating that the world would be fine that China uses Nuclear ordnance against the US ergo they'll get away with it.

No, that's not how that works. If china uses nukes against American assets in international waters they will be nuked.

>>513344212
>We have literal earth quake weapons
We've been trying for 45 years to topple the government of Iran with one embarrassing failure after another.
China is 10x bigger, 20 IQ points smarter, and manufactures literally everything, probably including parts of our super-seekrit wepons systems.
Shove your "rods from God" up your circumcised cock.

>>513328596
How you gonna defend America when Great Russia won against USA and whole NATO in Ukraine? Trump just surrendered to Putin in Alaska

>>513344706
I think the world likes affordable Chinese products more than American Jewish bullshit, yes.
Attacking a hostile military is justifiable.
Killing millions of civilians, not so much.

>>513344733
Not rods, Chang. What did you think all the gravity research was for? We quantized gravity and can earthquake your shit with beamz nigga

>>513336519
chinks already have technology to put weapons deep into the ground dumb dog

>>513344840
>We quantized gravity
lmao get a load of this nigger.
do you believe in ayyyy-lmaos too?

>>513344807
>Attacking a hostile military is justifiable.
A hostile military in international waters who have defensive pacts with most your neighbours because you act like a nigger claiming sea territory up to their coastlines.
>Killing millions of civilians, not so much.
At the point Nukes are involved intentional consensus is meaningless.

>>513338303
Absolutely underrated.

>>513328481 (OP)
Is this propaganda to support Trump admin. half trillion$ Golden shield modeled after Israeli Iron Dome?

>If we start a war, we may actually lose
So how about don't start it? Oh yea, it's too much to ask.

>>513328481 (OP)
>3000 km
that's a lot

>>513344953
>At the point Nukes are involved intentional consensus is meaningless.
At the point the US military is involved, international consensus is meaningless.
Clutching your pearls and shrieking "HOW DARE YOU" won't bring all of those seamen (kek) back from Davy Jones' locker.

>>513328481 (OP)
Our army of the faggiest fucking queers will just anal vore any hypersonic ballistic warheads.

>>513328481 (OP)
If weapons like these were deployed, everyone loses, you fucking numbskull

>>513341002
>Because it would be redundant, you already have a larger nuclear submersible fleet than China. And despite crashing into a huge fucking rock once have never managed to lose one, unlike China who had one sink due to incompetence during construction.
I realize nuclear submarines make this entire stupid idea moot, I was just asking the propagandist tool why he thought this idea couldn't be implemented by an adversary of chinks. I also wonder if the retard realizes thaht china is a country with some of the absolutely largest weaknesses ever seen in a county the US would try to destroy. Their stupid dams are an incredibly easy way to sabotage their entire country but chinkies don't really think before they mouth off.