Anonymous
(ID: fbuX8y3j)
8/18/2025, 5:19:09 AM
No.513337652
>>513337713
>>513337794
>>513337817
>>513337909
>>513337951
>>513338200
>>513338398
>>513338505
>>513340725
JEWS ARE NOTICING
> The Mamdani Effect is the collapse of long-claimed alliances with Jews the moment they become inconvenient. It is the legitimization of anti-Israel sentiment at the highest levels of New York politics and the tacit acceptance — even embrace — of the antisemitism that often accompanies that movement.
> New York City is home to the second largest Jewish population in the world. The idea that such a consequential election could tilt so heavily toward a candidate who is openly aligned with the anti-Israel movement without any sustained, public counter-effort from Jewish leadership is almost unthinkable. It is also proof that our influence is far smaller than critics claim, and that the will to use what influence exists is weaker than we want to believe.
> This is about far more than one election. Mamdani’s rise would normalize hostility toward Israel at the very top of city politics. It would give legitimacy to activists who believe that supporting Palestinian rights requires the erasure of Jewish ones. It would embolden anyone in New York who wants to import the slogans and tactics of global anti-Israel campaigns into local politics. And it would send a message to the next generation that such a platform is not only acceptable but potentially a winning strategy.
> What makes it worse is that this is not happening through violence or coercion. It is happening because everyday New Yorkers, many of whom support him out of a misguided sense of virtue, are willing to vote for someone like Mamdani.
> The mayoral race is a warning. If this is how quickly the support collapses in New York, the place with one of the largest Jewish populations in the world, what happens in places where our numbers are far smaller and our influence even more limited?
> New York City is home to the second largest Jewish population in the world. The idea that such a consequential election could tilt so heavily toward a candidate who is openly aligned with the anti-Israel movement without any sustained, public counter-effort from Jewish leadership is almost unthinkable. It is also proof that our influence is far smaller than critics claim, and that the will to use what influence exists is weaker than we want to believe.
> This is about far more than one election. Mamdani’s rise would normalize hostility toward Israel at the very top of city politics. It would give legitimacy to activists who believe that supporting Palestinian rights requires the erasure of Jewish ones. It would embolden anyone in New York who wants to import the slogans and tactics of global anti-Israel campaigns into local politics. And it would send a message to the next generation that such a platform is not only acceptable but potentially a winning strategy.
> What makes it worse is that this is not happening through violence or coercion. It is happening because everyday New Yorkers, many of whom support him out of a misguided sense of virtue, are willing to vote for someone like Mamdani.
> The mayoral race is a warning. If this is how quickly the support collapses in New York, the place with one of the largest Jewish populations in the world, what happens in places where our numbers are far smaller and our influence even more limited?
