>>513356647
>FSC v. Paxton
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1122_3e04.pdf
^interesting, was not aware of this.
>did a quick search looking for specifics in case law:
Extraterritoriality of First Amendment Rights
A key question in this area is whether the First Amendment applies to speech made by U.S. citizens or entities located outside U.S. borders.
While the Supreme Court has indicated a reluctance to extend constitutional rights broadly to foreign citizens abroad, some lower courts and legal scholars have argued for the recognition of First Amendment rights in certain extraterritorial contexts, particularly when U.S. citizens or entities are involved.
This issue becomes particularly relevant in the context of online speech, where the geographic boundaries of communication are blurred.
4. Enforcement of foreign judgments based on internet speech
Another area of conflict arises when foreign countries seek to enforce judgments against U.S. individuals or companies based on online speech that may be considered legal under U.S. First Amendment protections.
For example, in one case, a U.S. court refused to enforce a French judgment against a U.S.-based company that displayed Nazi memorabilia online, citing the First Amendment.
This highlights the potential for clashes between different countries' legal standards for free speech and the challenges of international enforcement in the digital age
I do not have anything specific off the top of my head.
