>>513378694
>>513379719
you type a lot of crap but you know very little about the world
>hiding behind "freedom of speech" to promote criminals
as weird as it might seem to a bootlicker, this simply is not illegal in any way
>"freedom of speech" [...] that led to several episodes of real life violence
this is the definition of a non-sequitur
perhaps if you publish a very good book, people will commit suicide
for all other offenses, existing laws already exist and are in effect
>"giving a voice" to criminals
why would this be wrong? and I do not mean that legally, I literally mean that as an ethical qustion
you think that criminals should have their constitutional rights revoked?
what shithole are you from? lol
>He live in Paris because too many peoples hate him in Japan.
this is the same as anyone that has created somehting popular or of value that now has a hate group that are just seething through their teeth that they did nothing and someone else managed to
>I hope that tard get
the previous illustrated
>4chan unwillingness and incapacity to protect their user base (very real)
that's just pretentious, nobody owes you anything son, and people by default are not your friends
as long as they comply with laws they do not have to give everyone a bodyguard nor take any extrajudicial measures to do so
>Refusing a legal request for information.
any request is legal
even if I write a letter to 4chan myself, the letter is very legal
however it does not mean that the person receiving the letter has to comply with my demands
"Ofcom" is just a random company that is trying to capitalize on 4chan and not even necessrily governmentally sustained
you know nothing of the law
>To be fair.
are you a woman?