Thread 513401921

Also proves that humans evolved from earlier apes in Africa, over hundreds of thousands of years.

Genetics is air tight. It's a fact.

>https://youtu.be/DZv8VyIQ7YU?si=3fsW1jQHeoK8VYIr

If you actually look into what genetics say, modern africans are a hybrid of a human and a monkey. Also they are way older human remains outside of afrika than anything that was found in afrika.
Uour map is just some jewish bull shit that has nothing to do with reality.

>>513401921 (OP)
yes anon they EVOLVED out of primitave Africans apes into modern civilsed humans while African niggers are still apes whats your point

>>513401921 (OP)
If we evolved from apes, then how come niggers still exist?
Check mate, OP.

SCIENTIFIC PROOF EVOLUTION COULDN'T HAPPEN

>Origin of life
There's no known way to turn non-living material into life, it's never been done before even in a lab. The belief that dust/water just randomly formed into functional DNA, proteins, a cell, etc. capable of reproducing itself is absurd.

>DNA
We OBSERVE genetic mutations delete data over time (e.g. we started with a grey wolf and only got increasingly retarded dogs like pugs and chihuahuas). You're just deleting or changing data randomly, and SELECTING from what is already there, and over time it always results in a net loss. Selection is a reductive filter.

This alone proves Darwinism couldn't happen. Natural selection is real but it has limits, Darwinists are so retarded they look at a process and think it must have no limit.

https://youtu.be/jyATE9StbK8

>Origin of sexual reproduction
There is no known way asexual creatures could develop sexual reproduction through mutation. Any benefits (or the obvious -50% efficiency) are irrelevant. It's not possible.

This is called irreducible complexity, one part is useless or harmful without the other part(s).

>Missing links
There is not a SINGLE transitionary fossil series. There is some speculated, but none show transitions.

The scientific community believed Piltdown Man was a human ancestor for decades before discovering it was a hoax. The entire "fossil record" is unscientific, lining up the remains of different animals is not evidence they evolved into each other.

>Horseshoe crabs claimed to be the same for 400 million years
They claim you were a fish 400 million years ago.

"They're just perfect" is not a legitimate answer to how an animal could remain unaffected by evolutionary force for 400 million years.

>>513401921 (OP)
wow im more evolved

>>513402337
It's like someone programmed an advanced AI, except to make retarded, mongoloid points.

>>513402337
all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that includes us.
once you realize this, you are advancing

All this proves is that browns are less evolved than whites

>>513402337
PERFECTLY ADAPTED TO ITS ENVIRONMENT AND YES IT DID EVOLVE

>>513401921 (OP)
>earlier apes
You can say niggers here, anon, it's fine.

>>513402337
Lol retard

>>513401921 (OP)
tldr: h. erectus is nigger blood, all humans are njggers.

>>513401921 (OP)
No it doesn't they are full of shit. They can't determine genetics of something without comparing it to what they already have record of. Most genetics going back further than 400 years is all hogwash and so indisquinishable from modern DNA they know next to nothing. Furthermore carbon dating is also bullshit. Many scientists say so themselves. They will compare dates to archeological artifacts that they have already predetermined the date for. It's all a bunch of bullshit and lies based off of assumptions. The earth is no older than 6000 or so years. Noah's flood was 4500 years ago.

>>513401921 (OP)
Yes, but what you have to understand is the lines between species are blurred and can only be drawn over large timescales. What this means is that humans and other hominins at certain times coexisted, bred with eachother, and produced different variants of "humans". Modern subsaharans have large amounts of DNA from a ghost hominin, while Europeans and other races do not. It's possible this crossbreeding happened after the humans that would become whites already left africa. So while we all come from Africa and continued to evolve in different ways, it's likely subsaharans do not represent the first homo sapiens, but are a mix of homo sapiens and other hominin species.

>>513401921 (OP)
OOA is not science

>>513401921 (OP)
That has been debunked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlVKkq6m7qY

>>513401921 (OP)
Yes, Sapiens is out of Africa. But once out of there he met and had to compete with mostly Neanderthals on the West and Denisovans in the East. This alone, remnant trace of Neanderthalensis and Denisovans you can find more or less all over Earth except for Africa, means we are differents. The Sapiens going out of Central Africa is not the same as the one landing in Mesopotamia is not the same as the one landing in Spain.

I'm not up to date on my game but it even got worse the last few years: they discovered trace of a primitive human that never left Africa in modern Africans. So you can not even argue the Sapiens stuck in Africa is our ancestor. This ancestor deluted itself in something else.