>>513416595
My god you are making some extremely tall claims on the basis of nought.
>It is difficult to differentiate between them
For who? I dont know what you are basing this on because nothing supporting that exists, Balarama and Krishna are basically products of the 5 Vrishni-Veeras traditions.
Most of the relationships you postulate are mere interpretatio graeca, its not based in reality of what they actually are.
>Indra (Balarama) and Krishna Vedic
Nope, Balarama is not directly related to Indra, you clearly havent heard of the Naneghat inscription where Balaram and Krishna and the vedic gods are invoked, why invoke them seperately?
Sidham to Dharma, adoration to Indra, adoration to Samkarshana and Vāsudeva, the descendants of the Moon ("Chandra") endowed with majesty, and to the four guardians of the world ("Lokapalas"), Yama, Varuna, Kubera and Vāsava; praise to Vedisri, the best of royal princes!
This shows the invocation of Vedic and Vrishni heroes in the same hymns.