← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 513409961

26 posts 8 images 19 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: HSHB/X6e) Brazil No.513409961 >>513410070 >>513410096 >>513410760 >>513410955 >>513411233 >>513412649
brits, are you worried you're going to lose 4chan due to this retard?
Anonymous (ID: mplSFxLA) United States No.513410069
It's not a loss. This place is nothing but shitskins and shillfarms seething at each other anymore.
Anonymous (ID: +/GvzUz+) United Kingdom No.513410070 >>513410175 >>513410353 >>513412768 >>513413310
>>513409961 (OP)
Not at all, breaking point is being reached here even amoung NPCs. I wouldn't worry about it.
Anonymous (ID: C+Ep2ZST) United Kingdom No.513410096 >>513410878
>>513409961 (OP)
No. I started using a VPN years ago
Anonymous (ID: Y8CPmfk/) Sweden No.513410175
>>513410070
England looks like a liminal place. Like an old Gmod map.
Anonymous (ID: sWsoNoWa) Switzerland No.513410265 >>513410731
It's already done. Law has been made, regulator has been appointed, wheels have been set in motion, £20k fines PER DAY have been issued, a total 4chan ban inside the UK will occur. Two weeks, max.
Anonymous (ID: HSHB/X6e) Brazil No.513410353 >>513414365
>>513410070
how's your average brit reacting to this shit? brazilian politicians also want to censor our internet and for some fucking reason a LOT of people are supporting them to do so, but you know, it's brazil, it's not a country known for being smart.
Anonymous (ID: jvqa0Ocp) Canada No.513410731 >>513410892
>>513410265
>£20k fines PER DAY
how do you fine a website that isn't hosted in your country? Nigeria could make anti google laws and fine them 100000000 bazillion. It's ridiculous
Anonymous (ID: A2kzjn9w) United States No.513410760
>>513409961 (OP)
Save the date, be in London
Anonymous (ID: fqviNIhY) Ireland No.513410842
Anonymous (ID: xu1qrJWP) Norway No.513410878
>>513410096
But question is.. Do you have a loisence for that VPN?
Anonymous (ID: sWsoNoWa) Switzerland No.513410892 >>513410949
>>513410731
You just send a letter demanding payment. Of course it won't be paid, but then you can ban it because of non payment. And that was the objective from the start.
Anonymous (ID: jvqa0Ocp) Canada No.513410949 >>513411081
>>513410892
Ah I see. A very vaginal way of going about things.
Anonymous (ID: PBftCvAh) United Kingdom No.513410955
>>513409961 (OP)
No i hate this fucking website
Anonymous (ID: sWsoNoWa) Switzerland No.513411081
>>513410949
Of course. What do you think 19 sanction packages are? White heterosexual power plays?
Anonymous (ID: Q+ke7Rpr) United Kingdom No.513411233
>>513409961 (OP)
yes
Anonymous (ID: ZJal1+9F) Ireland No.513411338 >>513411689 >>513412592
There's nothing distinct or interesting about Starmer. As much as Brits like to LARP about being the home of free speech, the home of liberalism, etc, the fact remains that Britain has always had very poor protections on individual liberties, with the possible exception of fair trial rights, and has specifically always been significantly worse on free speech issues than her contemporaries. This is not an issue with Starmer, this is just the nature of the Saxon animal. They've always been like this. It's in their guts.
Anonymous (ID: UfkX4v0K) Argentina No.513411689 >>513411907
>>513411338
>As much as Brits like to LARP about being the home of free speech, the home of liberalism
Lol, lmao even.
England is literally the place that switched to Protestantism so they could be more authoritarian.
Anonymous (ID: ZJal1+9F) Ireland No.513411907
>>513411689
Yes, but nevertheless. They do like to pretend.
Anonymous (ID: HSHB/X6e) Brazil No.513412592 >>513414012
>>513411338
in your opinion, has there ever been a good english leader who actually cared for individual liberties?
Anonymous (ID: SIs59R3J) Canada No.513412649
>>513409961 (OP)
Nigger retard straight to the death chamber
Anonymous (ID: cZltS5ut) United States No.513412768
>>513410070
>i wouldn woery bout it govena
good to know anglo
Anonymous (ID: GGFQm6Se) United Kingdom No.513413067
tbf im not bothered because at least he's making the country better after the tories
Anonymous (ID: qgR4c8Wx) United States No.513413310
>>513410070
>Not to worry
>We are almost at the breaking point
>Soon we will do something, I just know it

lol
Anonymous (ID: ZJal1+9F) Ireland No.513414012
>>513412592
Gladstone was probably the best of them, but the issue isn't the leadership. British people, and English people in particular, approve of expansive state authority and of regulation of private affairs. They'll say that they don't if asked about it in principle, but in practice they'll never fail to salivate at the prospect of expanding the state's powers of surveillance and state policing of their private lives. Don't forget that while political radicals are railing against the current Internet crackdowns because it disproportionately targets anti-migration and pro-palestine speech, it remains broadly popular with the British public. This has popular assent.
Anonymous (ID: m/rOFnzl) United Kingdom No.513414365
>>513410353
something like 60% of brits support the mass censorship because they think its protecting kids from seeing porn or something.