>>513425820>islam could have just as easily spread to europe via the sword - just as christianity did.And it did. The Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) were both conquered by Islam. Same with Southern Italy.
>the enlightenment isnt something to be proud of. it spawned movements like feminism and is based on the flawed idea that all humans are equal or some shit.LOL biggest retard award, feminism came an entire century after. Without the enlightenment, the west wouldn't be a dominant player in global politics. No modern medicine, more people dying, no electricity, no internet. You just hate democracy. Why don't you go live with muslims?
>there were islamic empires too, which secured peace. my point stands, in fact you are arguing in favour of my point - islam can lead to peace.Peace within Islam, which is stuck 500 years in the past.
What you are arguing is that if an empire of niggers were to exist and wanted to rape Japanese/white women, convert everyone to voodoo, and convert white/japanese men into women using HRT, that should be fine as long as it takes over the entire world and is too big to be stopped, so there is an age of peace because no wars happen because no one can rival the state?
That's your logic. Yeah Islam can bring peace if everyone else suffers for it.
>have you seen indonesians and malaysians? how about chinese muslims? they are not ethnically part arab.Because Islam came to those countries through trade, not colonialism. But it was also a subtle conquest because the elites forced it on everyone to become closer to trade partners. If that were to happen today, it wouldn't be because of the elites forcing people to adopt it, it would be through conquest and displacement.