>>513448697>>513448923Nice way to admit you do not have proof.
>I'd say start with basics like animal husbandry.Wow, you mean that if we take dogs, and artificially select for specific traits, we can get retarded dogs with specific features? Who could have though that if we took a group of humans, and only selected dwarves, we'd end up with only dwarves, must be magic, praise s()yence!
If humans can artificially select dogs with a pronounced specific characteristic to get dogs more like that, that obviously means every dog descended from lizards who descended from a puddle! it only makes sense, being able to separate blonds from redheads means they all descend from fish!
When your actual narrative, what you actually defend, is cleansed of the pseudo-scientific jargon, just like marxists, you're revealed for the utter retards you are. Without the veil of pseudo-intellect you put on for midwits, you are revealed for who you are.