>>513441020
cool
who you think demfags will run to beat trump's successor? I think if they lose again at the next election they could be gone for a long time but I've no clue who their frontrunner even is
>>513441039
>that's where you're wrong bong
I'd love to believe you, anon, but I come from the bleakest nation in europe. I hear all the stuff about 3rd terms and all that carry on, but don't see anyone actually doing or suggesting anything to make it happen. if I am wrong and you can show me something to convince me otherwise please unironically do
>>513441058
I really do sincerely hope it works out anon