>>513450831 (OP)
It's insane how much power the US has. Yet it's so fragile and highly dependent on the US Navy and other countries being too pussy to fund separatist movements or secessionist color revolutions on US soil. Something they could have done in California through the excuse of indigenous revanchism earlier this year. Yet their economies are tied to the US, so they can't actually harm their glue. (Western) Europe, as much as they say otherwise, needs the US to be the outside arbitrator. Otherwise they'd be fighting like cats and dogs again. They'll never solve that issue, so they're with the US for the long haul.
The US on the other hand (not Trump, who has nothing to do with US policy on China) really wants to end the war in Europe to orient the EU to help them curb China's ambition. While Europe doesn't want to acquiesce over resentment, even though it's to their own detriment, the US can't take on China alone. The US petrodollar is indeed in a precarious situation, especially with all that debt and the threat to their navy. Ironically here, Europe is the one acting out of emotion and grievances of impotence that aren't the US's fault. The US, maintaining its hegemony, as disgusting as it is in all the Jewish filth it promotes and exports, is what's preventing Europe from turning into another total battlefield. The US right now is just trying to convince Europe to accept and back down, but also Russia to have some type of agreement with regards to energy, China, and Taiwan. Russia will do what is best for its people, like China is doing now with regards to following US sanctions on Russia. If that means being allowed to sell energy again to the EU, keep the annexed land, they will do what is asked of them in restricting energy sales to China in a PRC-ROC conflict under threat of US sanctions.