>>513503207
100% fair enough, I hadn’t read any other of the ongoing long convo/argument in the thread already before responding to your post, just saw yours as one of the earlier posts and wanted to note that.
That is a fair enough and even astute point, anyone arguing against it just doesn’t fully get it I think.
I forgot who it was who made the famous quote, it’s probably a Google search away but fuck it too lazy, but it’s a great quote:
>If it was strictly incompetence, you’d expect some of the mistakes to sometimes be in our favor. But the mistakes are never in our favor.
Weaponized government and corporate actions, very clear, deliberate, real serious goals with lots of planning behind them, sometimes incredibly long-term over years or decades. And, yes, it’s a gift to such rulers, and their own backroom-rulers (the rulers OF the rulers, the lobbyists and bankers who have them on strings, various advisors and cabinets, intelligence agents and possible blackmailers, elite NGOs and think-tanks like the WEF, the UN, CFR, RIIA, Trilateral Commission, the WHO, the Bilderberg meetings, etc.) to portray them as just “incompetent” and “bumbling.”
It protects them from realization that, yes, they’re actually doing deliberately sinister stuff against the best interests of their own citizens, and it’s on behalf of some bullshit elitist globalist/internationalist agenda and what those faggots think is good for themselves.
But, bring this viewpoint out, and you have the masses programmed by the education system and legacy media to say,
>But … but … but that’s a conspiracy theory! It’s whacky nonsense! No one controls the world that deeply or is trying to! They’re too incompetent to do that! There’s no cabal, or consortium of cabals, pulling strings! That’d be a CONSPIRACY THEORY!