← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 513516095

4 posts 2 images 2 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: kkbbGUlo) United States No.513516095 >>513516168
I have some work I've put together. On sociology and statecraft, and on employment of them. the work is adequate enough .

But what I can’t seem to figure out yet is the end state, or in a sense, the beginning state. What would /pol/ love to see in a new state in terms to geographic tenure and expansion, what territory do you believe is advisable for occupation and settlement. Africa in their instability and land for the taking, consolidating a power base for a short time such as in Rhodesia, a carving of North America or south? The only thing I believe in (sort of) stone is Middle East North Africa is to be avoided, as should places with tribes divided which is few
Anonymous (ID: BiAWb95W) Canada No.513516168 >>513516613
>>513516095 (OP)
I don't give a shit as long as only people of strictly western european descent are allowed in
Anonymous (ID: kkbbGUlo) United States No.513516613 >>513516838
>>513516168
Fool. Civilization and primitive baser instincts are incompatible because they are uncivilized . No, the descent doesn’t matter only the culture they adhere. The Athenians at a time held annual banishments of citizens who contributed little via a voting system, eliciting participation of affairs. We have room for all descents but we have no room but incels, degenerates, and scourges on society such those who do not advance the line, relegating responsibility and participation onto other better men and only reaping the benefits through per chance things such as genetics and ancestry, such as those who don’t give a shit and enter to dictate such a lands composition.
Anonymous (ID: BiAWb95W) Canada No.513516838
>>513516613
Oh you're brown
Kill yourself nigger