>>513573740Thanks for the picrel, anon.
I remember at university, more than 20 years ago, a couple times I mentioned social class as a significant aspect of what we were discussing (in a few history classes) and then was immediately -- I mean within two seconds of saying the word "class" -- shut down by the professor who told me, directly, to focus on race and gender issues because this is where the real inequality lies. It was stark and like an epiphany to me.
Yes, all "identity politics," shoveled down our throats since the 1960s, has been a method to stymy the social class elephant in the room and redirect any social movements into safe channels about race and sex (there is no such thing as "gender," or differences between one's biological sex and what what the person views his or her biological sex to be; instead there are just two sexes and "gender" is a loaded concept used to create a new identity to further the use of identity politics as a wedge).
Since the 1960s, we have seen the rise of an overt oligarchy in America, and that was likely the real motive behind identity politics this entire time: to make America, and eventually the world, safe for a new Jewish-led oligarchy, albeit with plenty of good-goy white collaborators.
