Anonymous
(ID: i6lR6O6i)
8/20/2025, 8:49:47 PM
No.513560821
>>513561737
>>513562381
>>513563456
>>513565654
>>513566990
STOP BASHING FAGGOTS ALREADY
The MIGA push against the faggot community, which is often framed as a way to eliminate a perceived "social deviancy" and uphold traditional norms, could actually backfire.
If the push to eliminate what they see as deviance is successful, society wouldn't become more "pure." Instead, the societal standard of what is acceptable would narrow, and the collective conscience would become so sensitive that it would reclassify new acts as deviant. The target would simply shift. For example, instead of focusing on homosexuality or gender identity, the new "crimes" might be things like non-conformity in fashion, subtle differences in speech, or any slight deviation from the newly established, rigid norms.
By trying to stamp out a specific form of deviance, they would simply be creating an environment where a new, even smaller form of deviance would emerge to take its place. This is because a certain level of deviance is required for society to define itself. Without it, there's nothing to push against, and the boundaries of "normal" would become so strict that even minor, everyday actions could be seen as a moral failing.
They would start banning porn. Banning free and open internet. Free speech would be restricted so you have to praise Israel every day. The color of your house would be regulated and so on.
This is why faggots are a critical part of society and should never be completely banned. You can drive unity behind society by using them as a permanent "other" class to punch down on in perpetuity. Never a perfect acceptance but neither an outlawing.
If the push to eliminate what they see as deviance is successful, society wouldn't become more "pure." Instead, the societal standard of what is acceptable would narrow, and the collective conscience would become so sensitive that it would reclassify new acts as deviant. The target would simply shift. For example, instead of focusing on homosexuality or gender identity, the new "crimes" might be things like non-conformity in fashion, subtle differences in speech, or any slight deviation from the newly established, rigid norms.
By trying to stamp out a specific form of deviance, they would simply be creating an environment where a new, even smaller form of deviance would emerge to take its place. This is because a certain level of deviance is required for society to define itself. Without it, there's nothing to push against, and the boundaries of "normal" would become so strict that even minor, everyday actions could be seen as a moral failing.
They would start banning porn. Banning free and open internet. Free speech would be restricted so you have to praise Israel every day. The color of your house would be regulated and so on.
This is why faggots are a critical part of society and should never be completely banned. You can drive unity behind society by using them as a permanent "other" class to punch down on in perpetuity. Never a perfect acceptance but neither an outlawing.