Thread 513582598

HOES MAD HOES MAD HOES MAD!

(basically, we all do what this madlad done)

That's revenge porn and felonious. Delete your thread before you actually get arrested. I am concerned for you.

>>513582598 (OP)
I dont give a fuck about only fans. I dont get the seething about it. To me self help grifters are way worse. At least with only fans you can find it leaked content and jerk off. So its use is like a naked female poster in mechanic shop. Same cant be said for husle grind let me teach you to be alpha faggots.

>>513582598 (OP)
I get erect from the idea of exposing sex workers. Never actually done it because that's a legal death sentence in blighty, but sometimes I see these ladies role-playing as trad with a little family and a clueless simp husband, then I make a few clicks and can see them doing the most depraved stuff 10 years ago in their prime. Life is weird.

>>513582679
No, I won't. How about this you megaqueer:

SEND THE CENSORED NUDES TO THEIR PARENTS!

Fuck "the law", and fuck you!

>>513583028
Retard I'm trying to save you from yourself and OFCOM. I hate the shit as much as you do but I care about you so I try to stop you from making your own life a hell. I've been to prison. It sucks.

>>513582598 (OP)
Based nigga doing the lord's work.

>>513582598 (OP)
>>513583028
your last thread got ACKed,,,must have hit a nerve.

>>513582679
They're published publicly retard.

>>513582679
As far as I know it's not revenge porn to send a porn stars video to her parents so I don't see why this would be revenge porn

>>513582598 (OP)
uh yeah this is fucking gay as hell

>>513583094
LOL OKAY

Fuck the king!

>>513583094
did you play chess

>>513583859
Yes, I did.

BASED

>>513582598 (OP)
Not an incel but seeing ethots/vtumors and their simps causes actual disgust like when you see maggots or poop

>>513582679
>That's revenge porn
Nope. It's distribution of copyrighted material. Not even a misdemeanor. There is absolutely no scenario where losses are incurred by sending the copyrighted material to her parents either. Cease and desist is the only legal recourse she has.

>>513583848
More than a britbong, you are... mon ami.

>>513582679
>That’s revenge porn
Lawfag here. This is a demoralization shill. It’s not revenge porn.

>>513582598 (OP)
lol based. i love you guys so much.

>>513582598 (OP)
LAWL HOT DAMN

THOT STATUS: PATROLLED

This is at least a 5 year old shill topic. Being brought out to distract from the fact that jews are terrorists and israel is the largest terrorist training camp in the world.

>>513584523
It's the intent behind it. Consider:

1) Her content is paywalled and copyrighted
2) You use it to inflict actual emotional harm
3) You weaponize her intimate photos
4) Rigged jewish legal system
5) He's in the UK
6) They want to make examples out of people

Play stupid games win stupid prizes

--- ATTENTION ATTENTION

I HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO MAKE

...

...

...

Kill all niggers. Gas all kikes.

THAT IS ALL ---

>>513582679
HOLES MAD

>>513582598 (OP)
Absolutely based, but even if a bitch isn't prostituting herself online, they still do heinous, stupid things. Yes, even trad larping bitches. A lot of fathers have no idea what their daughters have been doing & it would drive them completely insane. Hell, we're aware of it and it's driving us men up a fucking wall

>>513584776
Intent doesn't matter
The photos are pornography, because it has been sold from the creator to the receiver. There is no more intimacy than when you buy pet food from a pet store. OF knows about it, the tax authorities know about it.
Worse case is the picture receiver is guilty of distributing copyrighted material

>>513582598 (OP)
>>513582598 (OP)
You can generalize to
>OP Daddy
And go for hoes in general. OF, insta and whatever else.

>>513585462
>Federal Cyberstalking and Harassment Laws: Federal law, particularly under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), makes it a crime to use electronic communication to engage in a "course of conduct" that causes "substantial emotional distress" to the victim or places them in reasonable fear of serious injury. While a single act might not be enough to meet the "course of conduct" requirement, the intent to harass and the resulting emotional distress are key factors. The act of sending the pornography to the woman's parents, with the intent to cause her harm and the resulting emotional distress, could potentially fall under this law.

Weird how so much shit got shoved into VAWA LOL

>>513582598 (OP)
how did he find her parents tho?

>>513585747
public records. easy to do.

>>513585583
I wonder if an LLM could automate this.

>inb4 muh ai!!!!
see the bill text

>>513582598 (OP)
>I'm sure u broke some type of law
kek

>>513585919
Yes. He committed Felony Stalking.

>>513585819

stalking isn't well defined legally and as a result information can be freely sent if public and not be considered doxing or harassment
there is no law against sending information given to the public as a service or free that is in a public space (onlyfans) to another person, regardless of familia relation or stranger

it is free speech, it is not stalking, and there is no way you can be prosecuted. kill yourself, groyper

>>513582598 (OP)
GDP 2.0: Thot Patrol

>>513585958
Uh oh shitwood is on the case.

>>513582679
>That's revenge porn
Sharing content with friends and family? No no I just thought they wanted a boner, officer.

>>513585972
where the fuck did groyper come from? are you a kike lawyer intentionally trying to seed this retard bad legal advice? I'm a student of law myself, though very new. I hate everything to do with LexisNexis.

Harassment; You meant to hurt the woman through your actions.
Stalking; You used public information in a *malicious* manner to identify her family. Compiling public info on it is free speech, acting with malice utilizing that information is not.

If you call an invocation to, or actually do, harass a woman using her nudes, I promise you any DA will issue a warrant for you. LOL

>>513584779
jeets and muslims and chinks status??

>>513582598 (OP)
Major incel energy

>>513585819
Which of them apply here? it seems like none

>>513586918
last bullet point.

>>513585972
>there is no law against sending information given to the public as a service or free that is in a public space (onlyfans) to another person, regardless of familia relation or stranger
hilariously incorrect, if its intentionally targeted with intend to hurt or cause ill effect

>>513587073
I'm not even joking. That individual person is obsessively on /pol/ posting misinformation and just stupid shit in general. I think I saw him on reddit once, based on typing style. Pretty sure it's the 4chan lawyer unironically. He's jewish. He hates the site and he's going to throw the OFCOM case is my prediction. Call me schizo. Hiro should not have hired a jewish lawyer.

>>513582598 (OP)
>revenge porn
lol! how exactly is that revenge porn? dude bought the nudes and shared them with other people.

>>513587299
It's copyrighted.

>>513584425
lol retard. copyright only applies if you distribute for profit. otherwise cops would be knocking your doors down everytime you have a movie night.

>>513582598 (OP)

Seems like a fun opportunity for blackmail.

>Buy nudes from slut.
>Find sluts friends and family
>Blackmail slut to not send nudes to friends and family.

>>513587299
>dude bought the nudes and shared them with other people
sharing content without the expressed consent of the owner? gg no re

>>513587390
>copyright only applies if you distribute for profit
costa rican intellectual elite here lmao

>>513587315
if I buy a movie which is copyrighted and give you an account password or a cd, how exactly is that violation of copyright, retard?! by your definition every photo that appears on the web and you view it is a violation of copyright by you because you viewed the photo. learn the law first before makin such retarded statemetns

>>513582598 (OP)

https://youtu.be/J6oTIjvw_-8?si=a82C5nCviMSrNTGS

>>513587472
ooh look recently migrated streetshittin benschod chiming in

>>513582598 (OP)
Isnt this picture like so fucking old, made when it was still called twitter? And now rrposted on a faggy subreddit?

>>513587582
I'm a medical doctor here, i advise you to kill yourself asap

>>513587525
Man, I've detailed this entire argument and I'll even cite case law because I'm tired of bickering incels defending this shit.

United States v. Florence: The U.S. Department of Justice has publicized the case of James Florence Jr., a man sentenced to nine years in prison in July 2025 for cyberstalking over a 16-year period. According to court filings, he engaged in "elaborate online harassment campaigns" that included posting digitally altered, sexually explicit images of his victims and publishing their personal information. This case is a strong example of how federal cyberstalking laws are used to prosecute those who use intimate images to harass others.

United States v. Latigo: Another relevant case is Heriberto Latigo, who was convicted under federal cyberstalking statutes for using nude photos of his ex-girlfriend to coerce her. This case, publicized by the FBI, highlights how the use of intimate images can be a key component of a cyberstalking crime.

United States v. Martin: In a similar case, Troy Allen Martin was convicted for blackmailing a victim using nude photos. These cases show how the use of intimate images in a harassing or coercive context can meet the legal requirements for a federal crime.

Most established fucking shit and children want to argue with a literal law student and tell me that he is wrong. I go to cornell faggots what do you do besides shitpost on 4chan? hang yourselves.

>>513587670
/thread

>>513587649
>I'm a medical doctor here,
god have mercy on those that have to be seen by you. I'll take U-Turn making streetshitter any day over poojeet that claims to be medical doctor

>>513582598 (OP)
This is the only valid reason to sub to OF thots. Go get ‘em boys.

>>513587873
funny how street shitters are living rent free in your retarded costa rican peanut brain

>>513587670
>hat included posting digitally altered, sexually explicit images of his victims and publishing their personal information.
hey retard, dont assume shit but actually read legal documents literally. he isn't defaming them by publicly releasing their shit with private info, he send it to their family members.

>who was convicted under federal cyberstalking statutes for using nude photos of his ex-girlfriend to coerce her.
he is not doing any of that since he is simply showing her family members what daughter does for living. like me telling your grandpa that you're a janitor at mcdonnalds and you're suing me for that.

>United States v. Martin: In a similar case, Troy Allen Martin was convicted for blackmailing a victim using nude photos.
once again, retard. he ain't blackmailing them for anything like more nudes, he literally signed up to their account, paid and reported to their family members.

clueless retards that live life on assumptions when everything is clearly defined in every legal document is the reason why world the way it is today

>>513587945
okay, ben's chod

>>513588124
Literally I can find hundreds of examples in the case law that cover every autistic edge case you can come up with. Literal fed and state. You are retarded and coping, stop trying to justify criminal behavior. You're a sick, stalking fuck, and once I pass the bar I will gladly fucking prosecute you in New York State if you do it here. And we will see who has a better understanding of the law.