Thread 513613693

Read this and tell me it's a coincidence. I compiled these numbers into this image myself so I know they're true. Sources are not required because go verify them yourself on Google Books or proper use of a search engine etc. They're assigning numbers from thin air to convince us of a false cosmological model

>>513613693 (OP)
You have it backwards. The numbers are correct and that hints at the true nature of reality. You are just not schizo enough to make the connection.

>>513613693 (OP)
>Read this
Nyu

>>513614320
>You’re just space dust goy. There is no God but Satan
OK

>>513613693 (OP)
>The Earth spins at roughly 1,000 miles per hour (1,600 km/h) at the equator. This rotational speed varies depending on latitude, being slower towards the poles
well that one was a lie. ok. anyways
>They're assigning numbers from thin air that just so happen to add up perfectly with the assigned equations from thin air which millions of independent scientists have verified through assigned experiments from thin air

>>513613693 (OP)
>The distance varies slightly due to Venus' nearly circular orbit, ranging from about 66.7 million miles (perihelion) to about 67.7 million miles (aphelion) from the Sun
wow. how many more lies did you manage to cram in there? it's almost like your name means "to deceive" in hebrew

yet another lie. man, you're on a roll!

>Maximum apparent diameter from Earth: 20.1 arc seconds Minimum apparent diameter from Earth: 14.5 arc seconds
did you put a single correct fact in there? hm.

now that is suspicious

>Isaac Newton began developing his theory of gravity around 1665-1666
>he released his landmark work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica in 1687, which included the mathematical formulation of gravity.
this one is almost correct

lie

wrong

>>513615568
>that one was a lie
nope. you aren't going back far enough:
https://astrosociety.org/file_download/inline/1c7129e4-7582-43c5-a50c-323c75a04063
>1,035 mph aka 1,666 kph

>>513615568
>>They're assigning numbers from thin air that just so happen to add up perfectly with the assigned equations from thin air which millions of independent scientists have verified through assigned experiments from thin air
funny how you actually think this. have you ever heard of the replication crisis?

>>513615745
you are an idiot im sorry to say because you are not looking at the original numbers that held for 250 years before being changed in the last 20 years. you are so easy to deceive.

>>513615810
i can prove any of these you try to put out but this one you weren't very clear because which planet are you referring to?

>>513614611
The material is demonic, read the Gospels.
>If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.

>>513613693 (OP)
Ah sweet

>>513615946
are you referring to the temperature of Venus because you posted Mercury. even modern wikipedia confirms the "Venus temperature 666" thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus

>>513616182
you didnt go back far enough. pic related just captured from "Tides in Astronomy and Astrophysics" (2012)

>>513616425
>you're not cherrypicking hard enough
my bad

>>513616474
Yes, I have.

>>513616529
Of course, no need to apologize.

>>513616690
True, I got that wrong because I was looking at Mercury.

>>513616690
I gave this one another try. here is what i got. also wikipedia makes no mention of the number 66 let alone 666. interesting.

>>513613693 (OP)
Old books such as?

this one is true but you're not really going back far enough so i won't trust it...

>>513617379
whichever one gives the value of 666

>>513613693 (OP)
Space is Fake until proven Gay

>>513616529
i just proved that kobo, coinbase and google play are all satanic. lol, lmao. it's too easy.

>>513616182
oh there's been a misunderstanding. my image was supposed to say 27.75 days not 27.5 days. 27.75 days is 666 hours. to find the claim that a lunar orbit around the earth takes 27.75 days, you have to go to older sources like this one from 2004:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239926279_Implications_of_lunar_orbital_periodicity_from_the_Chaibasa_tidal_rhythmite_India_of_late_Paleoproterozoic_age

everyone my chart is messed up because i accidentally put 27.5 instead of 27.75 for certain things.

>>513617865
no worries there's no misunderstanding it was just me looking up the value myself rather than trusting the authorities on /pol/. i'm a free thinker.

>>513613693 (OP)
Except the Arctic and Antarctic circles aren't 66.6 degrees. They're close, but they're not.
There's another gematria faggot Leaf on here obsessed with this shit and you find always "close enough" is enough for him to roll with it whilst insisting it's exact when it isn't.
The sun does one rotation every 616 hours, not 666.
Diatance from Venus to the sun is 67,237,000 miles
And so on
Fact check your fucking numbers and don't be such a gullible cunt

>>513617865
you're not going back far enough

>>513618232
>Diatance from Venus to the sun is 67,237,000 miles
"A New Manual of the Elements of Astronomy" (1868)
https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_New_Manual_of_the_Elements_of_Astronom/A0sAAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0

>>513618962
It's 67.6 million miles
Your mister Kiddle is wrong
And he's not even an astronomer
He's a fucking Theosophist.

>>513618962
you're not going back far enough

>>513613693 (OP)
Gravitational constant is 6.67 etc

>>513616690
>Wood, A. T.; Wattson, R. B.; Pollack, J. B. . (1968). Venus: Estimates of the Surface Temperature and Pressure from Radio and Radar Measurements. Science, 162(3849), 114–116. doi:10.1126/science.162.3849.114
you're not going back far enough

>>513619724
>Gravitational constant is 6.67 etc
didnt go back far enough
"The Astrophysical Journey" (1922)
pic related

>>513616529
>trusting google
baka. you're being deceived.

>>513619724
>Gravitational constant is 6.67 etc
didnt go back far enough
"The Astrophysical Journal" (1922)
pic related

>>513620090
>At the beginning of the twentieth century, the accepted G value was 6.66 × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2, which depended on the experiments of Boys [12] and Braun [13].
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8290936/

>1975
>gravitational constant 6.66

>>513613693 (OP)
No, you're jewish and you used ChatGPT for this. And ChatGPT adjusts itself to your jewish metacognition

So ChatGPT becomes as jewish as you are. And you both become dumber in your jewish echochamber

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/saturnfact.html

No Saturn does not have 66.6 arcseconds

Let this scientist explain how distances of planets are calculated and see if you can spot the bullshit. "We can tell how far away planets are because we know Earth is 93,000,000 miles away from the sun, and we can use that 93,000,000 miles to perform a parallax measurement on other planets to know how far away they are":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrpdwJNNskk
Except Earth is NOT 93,000,000 miles from the sun so their entire method of determining distance of other planets is yet another lie.

>>513620405
you're not going back far enough.

>>513620732
for example read pic related stating that we only know the distances to cosmic bodies because "we know earth is 93,000,000 miles from the sun and this distance ensures accurate parallax distance measurement using the angles measured 6 months apart"
EXCEPT earth is not 93,000,000 miles from the sun, they made that distance up too. therefore everything is fake. it says we know the sun is 93,000,000 miles away because of a space probe, but the truth is that space probe does not exist its another lie.

>>513621320
not to mention if they claim the reason we know the sun is 93M miles away is due to a space probe and bouncing radio waves off venus (lmao yea right) then HOW DID WE KNOW THE SUN WAS 93M MILES AWAY IN THE 1700S??

>>513621435
>HOW DID WE KNOW THE SUN WAS 93M MILES AWAY IN THE 1700S??
By the same method, dickhead. Instead of using the sun's parallax to measure even further stars, they used Venus' parallax to measure the sun's distance
Fuck me, you're stupid

>>513621435
>HOW DID WE KNOW THE SUN WAS 93M MILES AWAY IN THE 1700S
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdOXS_9_P4U
here's a really cool video on this exact topic. i really liked it.

ITT , one brain donor exhibits his staggering ignorance of all things scientific, preferring only things that confirm his obsession with the occult

Close the thread and move along or suffer the most inane fuckwittery in the catolog currently

>>513622002
No. the rest of the catalog is all spam. OP is a man of honor. i learn a lot of cool space facts by looking into his misunderstandings.

>>513613693 (OP)
Lucifer is Latin for "light bringer" or "morning star". Also half of your figures are fake and gay.

>At the equator, the Earth has a surface speed of about 1670 km/h (1037 mph) relative to Earth’s axis.

>Earth’s axis is tilted at about 23.44° (often rounded to 23.5°) relative to the plane of its orbit around the Sun (the ecliptic).

>Astronomers usually quote the equatorial rotation (~25 days) as the “rotation period of the Sun.” (600 hours)

>>513620732
>Let this scientist explain how distances of planets are calculated and see if you can spot the bullshit.
We bounce radar off the planets. Since we know the speed of light, we can calculate their distance based on how long the round trip takes.

>>513621811
we know that during an eclipse, the sun and moon are the same size. then you put that observation together with the phases of the moon and do some geometry to arrive at a good estimate.

>>513622498
lucifer doesn't even appear in the bible, lol.
>Isaiah 14:12: "12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
in reality "Lucifer" should be lower case (lucifer). it's just referring to the morning star which is the greek god phosphorus. the capitalized "Lucifer" rendition as satan comes later.