>>513614684 (OP)i highly recommend everyone watches the interview before drawing any conclusions. although the guy is intelligent and a
OChem prof at Cornell, he speaks like he's literally on the precipice of a psychotic break. he jumps from one unrelated
conspiracy to the next and weaves this incomprehensible web of loosely related things that effectively mean nothing when
put together. even tucker, who, to his credit, is normally good with bad guests, seems to have a difficult time keeping up with
everything the guy is saying. it seems like he's spent too much time diving into different right-wing rabbit holes and now lacks
any grounding in reality lol.
so, to answer your question: the implications are effectively nothing. that single statement is surrounded by so much other
nonsense that any reasonable person could assume he's out of his mind and not a realiable source.