>>513644180
>The elites have no political ideology, they only believe in money and power and what ever means to achieve that.
Strange, it seems as if when you just remove an arbitrary (and spurious) appeal to ethno-religious conspracy theories, you end up closer to a generalized theory of how elites operate. What if elites hold no loyalties to anything but power at all? No religion, no races, no ideology, no nationality -- just a shifting series of alliances of convenience? That seems to me to be more in keeping with history. After all, we had a thousand years of Christian rulers in Europe, and this statement seems to adequately encapsulate that history better than your statement does, yeah?
What if the whole JC thing is just a distraction -- a way to keep people divided so that no matter which prole movement "wins," we end up so divided that we're still in the exact same place we started... just exhausted and unable to mobilize for another generation?