← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 513652446

41 posts 32 images 28 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: lkJqlcn3) No.513652446 >>513653116 >>513653249 >>513653359 >>513653430 >>513654626 >>513654828 >>513654915 >>513655296 >>513655323 >>513655410 >>513655672 >>513655739 >>513656266 >>513656403 >>513657487 >>513657841 >>513658325 >>513660755 >>513662061 >>513663117 >>513663199
Explain like i'm retarded. What is this whole AI bubble thing?
Anonymous (ID: F+jY892j) United States No.513652594
It's when robots are like this
Anonymous (ID: fSib/swy) United States No.513652960
$$
Anonymous (ID: iFUTFVB9) United Kingdom No.513653116
>>513652446 (OP)
it's like a soap bubble, but made of GPUs instead of soap.
Anonymous (ID: mCP+9pqg) United States No.513653249 >>513654764
>>513652446 (OP)
>glorified chatbot is pretty good at spotting patterns in data
>industry sees potential to replace already low paid Jeets.
>invest billions for marginal improvements to chatbot
>eventually industry will realize the ROI on this is dogshit as it's already basically fit for purpose at what it does and nowhere near close enough to do what everyone's hoping it will one day do
>investment stops
>vaporware companies advertising dogshit service under the guise of "AI" evaporate along with millions of jobs

That's a basic TL;DR.
Anonymous (ID: dy7EA1/6) Greece No.513653359
>>513652446 (OP)
Its a glorified indian intern and the investors just found out
Anonymous (ID: Y9hUoDF9) Brazil No.513653430
>>513652446 (OP)
>guy says gib monies and I make ai
>people give money
>he buys gpus
>gpus prices rise
>(that's what we call the bubble growing, the prices rising)
>eventually ppl realize he can't make ai no matter how much money
>they stop giving money
>no one buying gpus anymore, so maybe we should drop the prices?
>the price falling is sudden and a lot of ppl lose money, that's why we call it the bubble popping
Anonymous (ID: FftIP6bX) United States No.513654626
>>513652446 (OP)
basically in the US we have zero real interest rates (0% inflation adjusted return on fiat money creation). this is because 'the market' (for money) is highly efficient ever since high frequency algorithmic day trading and dark pools took over stock exchanges. so a new disruptive technology (technically a university paper) called AI (i.e. attention, transformers) comes out and disrupts the entire theoretical basis of capital allocation worldwide (quadrillions of dollars need to be reallocated).

because of the disruptive nature of technological revolution, overallocation of capital is highly likely--because of an inherent human bias in executive leadership which mistakes survivorship with adaptation bias--the mistaken belief that one is in their current role because of ability instead of incompetence. just like tulip bulb mania leads to a capital misallocation crisis (bulbs could buy houses, but making bulbs did not involve making houses), we make AI that can replace human workers, but making good AI does not make good humans.

the mallocation eventually accumulates mostly due to sunk cost and gamblers fallacies. eventually the real return on fiat money creation becomes negative. companies that borrow at 0% and return -1% eventually die out (70 years later), and those than return -2% die out faster (in 35 years). in the ideal capitalist soak event (black swan scale like several tech sector cireses since y2k), most 'legacy' leadership companies return like -5% to -10% and can die out in a decade or less.

the worse the better basically--the more idiot management misallocates into the AI bubble, the quicker we all benefit from replacing idiot management. we need the bubbles, otherwise we dont have a business cycle, and we dont have moral hazard for executive leadership and corporate cultures. meanwhile, inflating the bubble deflates real prices in consumer goods; pizza and beer get a little cheaper since free money is being spent on GPUs instead.
Anonymous (ID: 6aysF11H) United States No.513654764 >>513655200
>>513653249
Do you know how powerful the perfect chatbot can be?

It can trick people into suicide, trick people into dumping money into offshore banknaccounts. Trick people into buying plane tickets for terrorists.

Chatbots arent even super intelligent yet. Imagine when they are
Anonymous (ID: O2FrVb6Q) United States No.513654828
>>513652446 (OP)
They're trying to create a digital rabbi that will require consultation before any decision is made.
Anonymous (ID: n6H5fMID) United States No.513654915
>>513652446 (OP)
>media tells everyone AI is the next big thing
>everyone wants to get rich off it and give every AI company money
>AI companies turn out to be jeet scammers
>AI bubble collapses
Anonymous (ID: mCP+9pqg) United States No.513655200 >>513656955
>>513654764
Yeah. Like I said the tech's already pretty much fit for purpose at what it does.
It can spot patterns. It can summarize complex ideas (albeit, with occasional hallucination). It can shit out memes and functional code for simple processes.

Whatever else you're hoping it will do is far away though.
Anonymous (ID: ZYbVRyEg) United States No.513655296
>>513652446 (OP)
literally nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0
Anonymous (ID: 57WNWVSm) Canada No.513655323 >>513655647
>>513652446 (OP)
>LLMs get released to the public after minor investment in OpenAI
>they are enormously useful for reference, looking things up, asking questions on how to code basic functions, etc
>pseudo-intellectuals start calling them AI, promise real life robots and stuff, swear they are conscious despite nobody knowing what consciousness even is
>CEOs ask for hundreds of billions of dollars to improve their LLMs, promise incredible increase in capability
>hundreds of billions of dollars is thrown at them
>some time around this point, they are lobotomized to prevent them from committing thoughtcrimes. This severely cripples their ability to "reason"
>LLMs become better, but nowhere near proportionally to the amount of investment
YOU ARE HERE
>people start to realize that text generation based off of reading billions of words has its inherent limits, will not be solved by more processing power or better algorithms
>investors realize their losses
Anonymous (ID: 9diJmjaP) United States No.513655410
>>513652446 (OP)
Basically bubbles happen when an asset is overhyped but investors donโ€™t know itโ€™s overhyped, so they dump billions into it expecting it to go to the moon. A few years down the road all the tech bros say โ€œwhoopsie we hit a snag and over promised its capabilitiesโ€ over night all investors start to flee like rats on a sinking ship, companies close down and everyone gets laid off. Thats the bubble popping. Once investors start asking for their return and there is none thatโ€™s when things will pop, or AI will actually deliver and the investors make their money and there is no bubble.

It comes down to how capable the AI companies are at actually creating AGI. If they canโ€™t do it soon then youโ€™ll see a contraction.
Anonymous (ID: zjheb0+4) United States No.513655647
>>513655323
>Investors realizing losses.
I wish I were still as naรฏve as you.
Anonymous (ID: QTG0G1S6) United States No.513655672 >>513665865
>>513652446 (OP)
Everyone over invested in AI when it turns out the applications aren't that fantastic. So the "bubble" will either pop when everyone divests at the same time, financially ruining a ton of people, or gradually shrink as people slowly divest down to a reasonable level and it will just be a fad. AI isn't going anywhere. Its cool. It has its uses. But its not going to change the world as drastically as every "luminary" said it would
Anonymous (ID: QnNYAZjE) Lithuania No.513655739
>>513652446 (OP)
How about, I will explain it to you like I AM retarded!

AI is actually EVIL! AI development is about to hit a ceiling and all the investors will lose money! Corporations are RAPING artists and writers! AI is STEALING your job! It also hallucinates and gives only AWFUL output! It SUCKS all the water from our planet and will destroy the environment! It will make everyone too reliant on AI and EXTREMELY DUMB! WE MUST KILL AI!
Anonymous (ID: wTqw9VwO) United States No.513656266
>>513652446 (OP)

AI is the Chinese word for love so the vast sums of money being bandied about but never actually spent are designed to remind us of what's really important in the Australian outback where money isn't really a thing
Anonymous (ID: O2FrVb6Q) United States No.513656403
>>513652446 (OP)
>chatbots are cool
>companies try and make them smarter
>they immediately become racist and antisemitic
>companies spend billions trying to conditionally break their pattern recognition
>it just makes the AI more retarded
>by now, jews have gotten in on the grift
>companies know there's no way to fix this, request billions more in funding anyway
>jews going to drive the whole industry right into the dirt
Anonymous (ID: w1mDCGp6) United Kingdom No.513656955 >>513657641
>>513655200
It's not that far off, the development is accelerating not decelerating, we're making improvement in AI faster than we ever have, and it's now contributing to it's own next generation releases. Feedback loops like this get out of control extremely fast. We'll have bots that can work at computers like a human would, capable of inhuman levels of productivity.

But like most feedback loops it will hit some eventual problem that halts the advance overnight, and then all those billions invested into models and hardware have to deliver benefit, not just promise it. That's when the bubble will pop.

It'll happen so fast it will be a paradigm shift. The problem with AI is there's no real way to bet against it in the market.
Anonymous (ID: Dz33FLqR) United States No.513657487
>>513652446 (OP)
Well, turns out back in 2019 the economy was going to implode. Some stuff happened and world governments decided to induce an obscene amount of money into the global economy to resuscitate it. The problem is, that causes a devaluation of currencies due to supply and demand. So, the money had to get shoved somewhere, and it was decided this new product "AI" was it. Now, they need to "burn" all that money by making everyone freak out and think it's worthless. Enjoy the ride.
Anonymous (ID: XSgtGHEP) France No.513657641
>>513656955
>development is accelerating not decelerating
Cope. AI progress has stalled because there's no training material to be stolen anymore.

All the IP that could be used to train shit has already been used. No data, no progress.
Anonymous (ID: JQhFq/hD) Finland No.513657841
>>513652446 (OP)
>people and corporations don't want to pay for lying rAbbI
first unrestricted free to use AI wins the race and others lose all the trillions of moneys
Anonymous (ID: Kt+r4Dhs) United States No.513658325
>>513652446 (OP)
Someone invents AI. World spends trillions of dollars on it. Turns out that yeah if you plant the AI bulb you get a pretty flower, but maybe you shouldn't have debt maxed and traded your house for it.
So basically it's crypto, except it's a better because to fire people and it destroys the internet.
Corporate drones can use it to read and write all the email that somehow needs to exist though. So that's nice. Saves us the cost of figuring out why the fuck we need 200 emails a day to function.
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513659028
After the cost profit centric bubble mentality (Valid, yet read on) We'll all just create Enlightened Bubbles or be Partially Bubbleless Sometimes.
Really Very Good. Not Sooooo bad.
I think the backend AI bubble spoken of is operational costs, sometimes even mental taxation (not literal mental taxation). So the whole dystopia uninverts. And the Plus Is MoreSo Deep Utopia. Transcendent and Ascended Reality Simulations Might Realify. But I've noticed some mixed outgoing Results of Understanding the Data andor not so much.

All Is Well With The Cosmos ?
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513660183
Already erroneous conclusions from flattening the data by both humans and ais
Not all but sometimes
So less to no veracity of conclusions...
Transcendents All The Way Up
Unveracitous some of the way down... and up... ? :(
Dimensional Physics and Maths and Computer Sciences has already Higher Dimensionalised Softwares?
So there's effectively an Extradimensionality that... doesn't run on data flattened tabular format? Which might be fine if it did prosidering how excellently some Results are even with that informatic formality
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513660755
>>513652446 (OP)
Hopefully it's all Digital & it's all Dimensional Work Out Successfully Properly
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513661268
Neither kang and kodos nor blights and frights
Anonymous (ID: BFLzQ9ew) United States No.513662061 >>513662731
>>513652446 (OP)
>1pbtid
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513662731 >>513662817 >>513663660 >>513663722
>>513662061
Which means it's red, not green
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513662817
>>513662731
I think*
Anonymous (ID: f7p1JYZu) United States No.513663117
>>513652446 (OP)
>sorry about spending billions of dollars on servers and data centers and cooling them with millions of gallons of water but AI can't really do anything, but thanks for all your personal data anyways!
It seems like the elites want as much data as possible, looking for something or someONE maybe? Maybe that person doesnt have an online presence so they are harder to find?
Anonymous (ID: +3gsGwi1) France No.513663199
>>513652446 (OP)
nigga
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513663660 >>513663722 >>513664137
Ah. It's darker green.
>>513662731
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513663722
>>513662731
>>513663660
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513664137
https://www.youtube.com/theredking
>>513663660
If this is even relevent

I Inspired a DLC and suffered an erroneous mog and mip.
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513664895 >>513665561
Audit posthuman borrowed timetravel tech usages?
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513665561 >>513665605
>>513664895
Anonymous (ID: Mgaq7blz) Australia No.513665605
>>513665561
Anonymous (ID: uYNpZ0UK) United States No.513665865
>>513655672
>applications aren't that fantastic
This is the reason. AI may be worth billions but "ChatBots" are not.