Thread 513708660

This is a list circulated by Democrats on words to not use

>>513708660 (OP)
Gonna need a source and link on that

>>513708660 (OP)
can we add problematic, i fucking hate that word and everyone who uses it

>>513708975
For me, it's 'toxic'
>ah well you don't act like an effeminate home? Toxic masculinity pal

>>513708660 (OP)
Lunatic SJWs aren't just going to not eat them alive over this. And that's their entire base

>>513708975
i think 'fuck' and 'hate' are more problematic than saying "problematic", chud

>>513710571
They were retards for trying to build a base out of those lunatics in the first place. Its like trying to appeal to scientologists, sure they're noisy and powerful, but everything about them is an anathema to 90% of the population

>>513708660 (OP)
>blacklisting "threat to democracy"
That's going to be funny for them to try and enforce. That is their only attempt at attacking Trump is to just claim that

>>513711947
The democrats were a massive tent and they thought they could include those crazies while keeping a lid on them, not understanding that those crazies are just fascist-adjacent and want to dominate the party. This is unlike the alt-right who will whine about not being based enough, but agree with 70% of what republicans want anyway

>>513712049
They could just replace with it "blackmailed pedophile who works in service of a hostile foreign nation" and it would hit harder.

>>513710571
Their entire base is the 100 million plus nonwhites in this country, shoehorned into an alliance with around 50 million white traitors (what you call "SJW"s)

>>513708660 (OP)
Didn't they also ban the use of the word "blacklist"? Why are they using their own banned word?

>>513708660 (OP)
haen't you been paying attention? both parties in the US have been willing to fully reverse on key issues if it means they can pick up disenfranchised votes. It works.

>>513708975
That's problematic

>>513708660 (OP)
Lol. That's their entire platform. So what next, the flip is real and the dems go full Pol Pot?

>>513710571
These are the words they use to identify themselves and out outsiders. How are they going to operate when they can't find each other.

>>513708660 (OP)
jej

>>513712136
Except the leftist crazies are rabid and will accept no less than total control. I have no idea how how dems are going to change their bases' vocabulary overnight. This shit has been pounded into these soft heads for two generations.

>>513708660 (OP)
Doubt.jpg

>>513708660 (OP)
Source: Notepad

>>513712228
>blackmailed pedophile who works in service of a hostile foreign nation
That's both parties already, they have that in abundance

>>513708660 (OP)
180 you say?

>>513708761
Yeah, this is fake until proven gay.

>1 post by this ID
Shills are posting fake articles hoping to mislead anons, this looks fake and there's a 1 post in the catalog claiming that Blackrock has reversed its policy of buying houses (it hasn't). A legitimate OP posts an archivedclink. If there's no link, doubt the claim and call OP a self-defeating shill faggot.

>>513708660 (OP)
>Source: this JPG I created
Fuck off mutt

>>513708660 (OP)
> BIPOC

I dare them to stop using this term. They can't.

>>513708660 (OP)
the privilege has really backfired

>>513708975
Anyone who uses juxtaposition should be cast into the sea with concrete shoes.

>>513708660 (OP)
A little late in the game for this, no?

>>513712136
The DNC ideology openly embraces the concepts of radical deconstruction and social engineering that the crazies expouse. They literally can not distance themselves from these people because these people are exactly what they want; a militarized welfare dependent class that rejects western norms in favor of building a new world order.

>>513708660 (OP)
>This is a list circulated by Democrats on words to not use
source here
https://www.thirdway.org/memo/was-it-something-i-said

>>513708660 (OP)
>>513708761
>>513714097
Here is a link because OP is a fag. Authenticity is still not verified.
https://x.com/adamwren/status/1958859560749277548

>>513708660 (OP)
of course they are. they have no values, they hold nothing sacred, every cause that they say they champion is just a means to an end to them, the moment that thing is no longer a means they drop it and take the opposite position, if niggers ever became a hinderance to leftism theyd become so racist than anyone who has ever used /pol/ would blush, same with trannies, same with all of it.
>then what is their actual ends
trouble making. anything that is good and honest and fosters a stable society is their enemy.
>but why? thats retarded
the only way it makes sense is to take a step back and look at the grander picture: left wing politics is just the public face of left hand path occultism. Dont believe me? Look up the core tenets of lhp occultism, and compare it to left wing politics. Have a great day!

>>513708660 (OP)
haha nice try
it's "denylist" now
your repo has been banned

>>513708660 (OP)
Add paradox of tolerance to the list

>>513708975
"solidarity" also gets me

>>513708660 (OP)
"Lunchtime Rowdies " et al.

>>513717176
Thanks, cause op was lazy.

>>513708761
Too many people were playing woke bingo when they watched the DNC convention or the news. You could print out cards with those catch phrases turn on the TV and play bingo with them. Someone could win in less than 30 minutes.

>>513708660 (OP)
they just want to sound less elitist and more folksy and ordinary, less educated to appeal to the working class

>>513712708
>will accept no less than total control. I have no idea how how dems are going to change their bases' vocabulary overnight. This shit has been pounded into these soft heads for two generations. Most of it was for only 10 years. Like a fad that should have gone away sooner.

>>513717082
>a militarized welfare dependent class that rejects western norms in favor of building a new world order

>>513716327
fuck you that's a real word expressing an objective, external concept

>>513708660 (OP)
They're still anti-White.
Until they issue a public apology to all White people for being racist against them, I'm anti-democrat.

>>513708660 (OP)
Getting tired of you idiots saying one thing in your headline, and the substance of your thread is something different.
These terms are NOT policies.

>>513708761
https://www.thirdway.org/memo/was-it-something-i-said

>>513708660 (OP)
Stakeholders is odd. It is completely neutral language you will see in any kind of business document. It is different than a shareholder. I suppose it's because they look at it from the commie point of view.