Thread 513743584

Note to jannies, discussion of laws is a political topic.

Why is this illegal? It doesn't spread diseases, it doesn't cause any unwanted pregnancies, it doesn't create any social burdens, it doesn't result in abortions.

If anything, it reduces the spread of disease because there's no way to catch HIV, HPV, or HSV through it, and it reduces abortions because of no possibility of pregnancy.

>>513743584 (OP)
>It doesn't spread diseases
I would argue that many diseases spring over from animals to humans, and more contact in that manner would probably lead to transmissible diseases to develop.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_zoonotic_diseases

>it doesn't create any social burdens
It probably does, though. Who wants to marry the person who’s a known dogfucker? Idk about the implications on the birth rate.

>>513744067
>I would argue that many diseases spring over from animals to humans,
We've been living side-to-side with dogs for around 20,000 years. Any diseases that were going to cross over have done so centuries ago.

>>513744328
I guess if human/Dog intercouse would increase, so would the chance for a disease to adapt and spring over. There are several diseases and parasites that dogs can carry.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319273/

https://www.animalwised.com/dog-diseases-transmitted-to-humans-2814.html

https://iheartdogs.com/illnesses-and-diseases-dogs-can-transmit-to-humans/

>>513744785
>I guess if human/Dog intercouse would increase, so would the chance for a disease to adapt and spring over.
There are millions of people doing it worldwide already.

>>513744925
I don‘t know how wide spread it is but I am arguing that the chance of infection/the development of said, would increase.

If ppl want to do this kind of stuff I guess if the animal isn‘t hurt idc, since they are property (that should not be mistreated). But I personally would probably not associate with a known dogfucker for example. It seems to me like another step down the slippery slope that fag rights started.

>>513745858
>I am arguing that the chance of infection/the development of said, would increase.
I guess this is true on an individual basis, but looking over the links you gave, most of these are risks even without sex. For rabies, all a dog has to do is lick your hand (especially if you have a cut on it, but even if not) to give it to you, it's not like being fucked in all holes is going to make it worse.

>>513748041
>most of these are risks
I guess I should have written "ALL of these are risks" anyway.

>>513748076
Which is exactly why we vaccinate our dogs against rabies, treat them for heartworm, and take them to the vet if they're showing signs of mange/scabies/skin fungus infections/worms. . . .

>>513743584 (OP)
one of the big reasons why the north of Norway resisted christianization was because christians forbid having relations with cows. look it up.
to this day there are still loads of colombians who have relations with donkeys before they sleep with human women.
my point is that this is only accepted in uncivilized peoples.

>>513743584 (OP)
tbf, as a person in kink community, the most degenerates around the world are germans for some reason, like 9/10 of the fucked up kinks I read are coming from germans, idk why

>>513743584 (OP)
Because its morally wrong, and if youre interested in it, you should be committed to an asylum. Problem solved. *rubs hands* goes right away as a question when you put them in padded rooms with people eating their poo. Why do we put poo eaters in asylums, same reason.

>>513748299
Checked, big agree

>>513748583
Fuck you, stop slandering my country degenerate leaf. One day soon, pic rel will happen.