>>513750688
Why should keeping children off potentially dangerous sites be the normal adults burden to bear? The responsibility should lie with the parents.
>>513750688
I don't. I also don't want to give corporations my ID. But it doesn't matter what I want.
(You) want your children to be safe. So (you) should monitor your children's internet usage. That's your job. It's not for the state to do at everyone else's expense.
>>513751292
Except in this case the driver is a child that the parents allowed to drive. The solution isn't to force others to submit to mandatory identity checking at every intersection, the solution is to punish the parents who let the child drive.
>>513751723
They're call dykes, Anon. And by fighting to erode privacy rights in one area, whether it personally affects you or not, you are undermining it in all areas.
>>513751723
12 IQ take. Normalicing surveilance and eroding privacy is not a win. Even if you don't use that site, it normalises it. Next time it's 4chan needing ID to post.
you are utterly retarded. Think of the societal consequences other than the immediate "Libs owned".
>Set up ministry of truth >Try to silence your enemies >Lose >Your enemies now want you to identify yourself before you want kiddy porn >B-b-but much freeze peach!!!
LOL
LMFAO even
>>513753662 >it is better to be an idiot who is useful to his enemies than a useless idiot
Thank you for demonstrating further that you are an idiot who doesn't understand what he is doing.