Thread 513797628

>2013
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012: Signed into law by President Barack Obama and put into effect on July 2, 2013

This act was for "protecting" Americans (the dominate cultural exporter of the west) from foriegn propaganda. Except one tiny provision in that law also allows them to use their own propaganda on Americans

>women and propaganda
Every notice in BLM how White women were painting the black fist on their face? Its because at that time, social media was promoting it as the dominate culture, and women follow the dominate culture, always.


>the algorithm and you
Social media has propped up social issues like LGBT and BLM since the mid 2010s, I think most people here will agree on that.

You specifically, probably will never see what those thousands of White women saw in their social media feed, because it knew not to target you.

It wont target you, because it already filtered you out, data collection allows them to find who they need to target.

If you want social change, you target women

>>513797628 (OP)
Take Sydney Sweeney for example, she switched sides fast, why?
Because now the right is winning, thats why.

Woman are known to follow which ever culture comes in and takes over. I think it is hardwired into their survival. In the past, all the men die defending the village, what comes next?

The new men come next, they cant fight back, the "girl boss" is nothing more than a fantasy. In reality, the women accept the "change in management."

Woman are targeted specifically for marketing because they fall for it many times over when compared to men. This is no secret, but it has a darker part. If they fall for the marketing, do you not think the people in charge wouldnt think that they would fall for the propaganda too?

Look at any large social change done through social media, it is almost always women leading the push. Why are they falling for it?

Because it was always like that, now we are seeing "next generational warfare" and they are targeting women to push their agenda

>the white feather

We've seen this before where the governement targets women to get men to change or to do something.

The white feather campaign was used by the governement to use women to target men to fight.

The tech companies that know everything about you certainly use their algorithms for a modern white feather campaign on social issues.

>>513799219
2013 was the start. Social issues like LGBT really took off during the mid 10's as well as BLM.

Look at the "refugees welcome"

>>513797628 (OP)
Notice the up tick after 2013?

>>513797628 (OP)
>2013
Lgbt gets an uptick and then goes on to have an upwards trajectory

>>513797628 (OP)
>2013
Transgender also has an interesting uptick in 2013

>>513797628 (OP)
>2013
Equality has an interesting bump too

Not a single response?

>>513797628 (OP)
Obama was CIA like his mum and grandpa

>>513797628 (OP)
yup

>>513803120
>>513803120
>>513803803
Anyone know of any other terms to search for?

>cis
This one seems to have always had relevance, however an upswing in 2013 put it on an upwards trajectory

>>513800213
Yeah, that's when it all started going to shit.

We got hit up by weaponized social engineering that completely subverted western society.

Yeah, that's when it all started going to shit.

We got hit up by weaponized social engineering that completely subverted western society.

>>513805744
Firgot my graph

>>513806135
And this is what started it. Ie seen 2010-2015 referenced numerous times for when people here began to notice something had changed

>diversity is our strength
This one is pretty obvious, something pushed it into the stratosphere in 2013.

What are some more "phrases" that the WEF likes?

>>513797628 (OP)
bump

>>513808448
Thank you. There is an interesting lack of interest in this thread. I may compile this to be better formatted later. Im just posting things as I think of them at the moment.

>white supremacy
>captcha: whgay lol

>>513805617
How about "domestic violence" that might be interesting.

>>513810391
For violence, no but domestic terrorism certain has something .

I am using Google trends to look at the interest in certain topics to see what gets popular around 2013

This one is kinda iffy

Most of them seem to be race related

>incel
Here's a good one. In came into existence after 2013

>>513797827
>Because now the right is winning, thats why.
Women are subversive parasites, they want a share of every movement to be women so they can influence and control it, at the very least make sure it doesn't act against women.

>>513798307
>it is almost always women leading the push.
>see women leading every movement against you
>"durrr guys they're being propagandized against us!"
You are so fucking braindead and incapable of putting two and two together I don't know how you even fucking breathe.

>>513798307
Appears our ancestors already knew this.
Why women have never been given political power anytime in Western history - except in this modern jewish era (1913-present), with jews in total control.
Good luck putting that genie back in the bottle. What elites do is use women politicians as puppets to enforce some kike policy. The other side could that too.
Plus women's feelings won't get hurt because they'll still feel like they get to participate.

>>513811085
Forgot my puc

>>513811328
Wrong. They follow the status quo. What the strong men do, the women will follow

>>513811328
>>513811584
Thank you for the bump

I think I've shown that after 2013, some thing changed

Didn't black rock make their money in 2008? When did they consolidate their clout enough to enforce DEI?

>>513812669
This is why extreme pejudical violence is the only answer left. Anything else the fags and kikes spew out in this thread is either gay or jewish.

12/21/12 was the end of the world.

>>513797628 (OP)
>social media was promoting it as the dominate culture, and women follow the dominate culture, always.

You are wrong. Women CREATED that culture, because biologically it appeals to them.

Keep coping with your "women are our greatest allies, we just must ensure DA JOOZ don't tell them whites are bad". You guys are in for a rude awakening when you realize everything you blame on DA JOOZ, it's actually women being women.

We gave women freedom 100 years ago. Now everything changed. 100% of society is now under control of women, and they shaped society to their liking. As long as women share a civilization with men, voting with same powers as men and having the freedom to not procreate with men who vote against female interests:

>alimony for single mom will continue.
>"Refugees" will continue being imported
>socialism will continue to grow
>Women will continue fucking black guys as they act more like women, so they find them more fun than high IQ white guys playing video games in their basement
>divorce laws will continue raping men

stop making excuses for women. Women hate you

>>513814053
>meme flag
>hate white women
>muh BBC
I hope Chyna stops being faggots and just nukes India already.

>>513814053
No retard. Social media targeted women for the use of manipulating them.

>Algorithms serve up what people see
>isolate the group most prone to propaganda
>together group with messaging that is probably left

Right there, half the population is in your pocket. The simps will follow, and that is the target. The target has always been the young military aged men. Men are more resistant to advertisements, but we live in a time that promotes sex everywhere.

All you need is the mass of women and the simps will follow.

>>513814053
Another thing, I said from the start that "its women being women." I told you that up front. That is the problem, women give in to propaganda way more than men naturally

>>513814780
women didn't give in to propaganda

They created it. Women own all of us now because we willingly gave 100% of our power to them the minute we said "marry who you want, not who your father chooses for you. Also you have the same voting power as a man now"

Men had no choice but become slaves of women the second that deal was made. 100 years later, here we are.

Bump

>>513815338
So women are inferior, but they managed to be superior in a way that the enslaved all of man?

You are giving them way too much credit

>>513814053
>Women will continue fucking black guys as they act more like women

This right here in your post, look at the media post 2000. What changed in the music industry? Pic related, is what happened. The music shifted to push rap culture to the top.

Whpever pulls the strings promoted what they like. Women followed, so did the simps of women, and then the culture changed

>>513815757
Men gave them the power, so yes, they enslaved all of humankind.

If they don't like a man for his political opinions, all they have to do is not breed with that man. He will die, along with his genes which created his political opinions in the first place.

Women ultimately decide if you live or die, if your political opinions exist or go extinct.

And they do so because men agreed with this system where 60% to 70% of the men don't even breed, yet they are all working to make a cushy civilization so women can have the greatest joy of their lives fucking different men on tinder on a weekly basis

you people are cucks letting this happen, working for nothing. I don't want to continue being a slave of women, if they want independence then they should make their very own civilization separated from men.

>>513816159
Women didn't follow it, women made that kind of music popular because it's what they like.

Also blacks dominated culture because not only most women like their culture, women were also pretty much only reproducing with black men, so black men are and continue to rise in numbers against white people.

You guys are lost, with this leftist garbage doctrine of "le television tells people what to do". Nobody fucking follows television or culture or propaganda.

Women follow their pussies, and with us giving them freedom, that pussy led us right where we are.

>>513816658
>>513816531
I think you lack the ability to think beyond level or two of abstraction.

Here's how this works:
>brainwash the easiest and largest group possible
This group is women, we know this based on advertising data that shows women are 70% to 80% more likely to be influenced by an ad over men.
Propaganda and advertising works EXACTLY the same way.

Black rock knows this and said they want to force change into the culture. Last time I checked, it takes about 10 years and using force doesn't work. So what did they do?

1. They targeted women via social media. Half the population of any country is now the target

2. Use algorithms to serve up a feed that is PRO what you want and CON what you dont like.

3. Men will simp to get laid (see male feminist) these men will adopt the ideals of the large female groups. Awesome so now majority of half the population is in your pocket, while attracting some fighting age men

4. Continue using advanced algorithms to promote your side and only your side (see pride flags on business profile pics in june)

5. Circle back to the fact that women will always follow what is popular.

6. Promote your imagery in the media, music collaborations of white female pop singers and black rappers, show interracial couples in movies, etc

>>513816658
> Women didn't follow it, women made that kind of music popular because it's what they like.

Last time I checked, women didnt own the record labels, they arent in positions of management.

Once again you are falling for the play, they used women to promote their side, they knew this would pit women and men against each other.

You are an example of a "casualty" in what they call, next generation warfare.

You refuse to think beyond "its women's failt," which I am not disagreeing with you. I am saying WHY it is their fault.

I am giving you the answer as yo why you are particularly mad at women

Lol looks like all of my screeching about this over the past month got a thread made on it. Good man. I can't make my own threads so.

Ya fuck this gay propaganda ridden world. Everything is one massive eugenics and psychological experiment. Kill your "leaders" or be replaced.

>>513818309
What were you saying? I think I missed it, I've been busy irl so I haven't spent much time here in the last month.

I noticed something earlier when another anon was saying Sydney Sweeney was an intelligence asset. I thought that the anon was giving her way too much credit, and it just dawned on me what Is happening instead.

I made a schizo thread and just threw some shit at the wall. I think later ill go back and refine this a bit

I find it bizarre that not many anons would think any of this is of interest

No one is interested in a propaganda campaign conspiracy?

Oh well, ill keep bumping as I think of other terms to search.

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.

>systemic racism
Hardly existed before 2013, little bump in 2013, and then explodes in 2019

>>513822377
Do you remember any lefty slogans? Im curious to see when they started.

>Latinx
Im surprised by this one, I thought it was more recent

>>513816658
>Women didn't follow it, women made that kind of music popular because it's what they like.
They like it because they are bombarded by it until they like it, it is very easy to manufacture fake hype if you control the media, how do you think artists like billie eilish become popular overnight? They fake engagement, video plays on yt, spotify and they pay to have the artist sound on every wallmart speaker while you buy, give it a few months and suddenly everybody who is a normie retard with no pattern recognition (women) likes belly eyelash, that's how it works, they've been doing this for ages, that's why people call them industry plants, but that's besides the point, the point is that women adhere to, and perpetuate whatever they think is the consensus, and the consensus can be easily faked by the media

>>513822942
Exactly, that is why they were the main targets. They were used to subvert everything else

Im noticing some of these had interest pre-2013 but they all get a resurgence post-2013

>>513822377
Girls are much more prone neurotic disorder, girls are victims of female directed school organizations, with the obsessions of inclusivity, mental health, well being and the rejection of discipline and the state where are no winners. Participation is the value. Not winning. All of the interventions are driven by women against women. Social media does not help either. Women have never needed science or internet to unleash social contagions. By constantly focusing on mental health and introspective activities with children, its having the opposite effect. Its destroying the mental health of children and girls are far more prone to this contagion than boys. They always have been.
Look up Dr. Dani Sulikowski and her theory on intra-sexual competition and how it affects society. It’s a malicious evolutionary strategy. The woke nonsense reaches a point where it became too ridiculous to accept anymore. Land acknowledgement is another example - it was a lovely gesture, a reachout to reconciliation. It is now heavily culturally policed, enforced and become the norm.

Wokeness is manipulative reproductive suppression. Its just an ideaology though, one that will run out of steam and be replaced. As soon as these stupid ideaologies fall, more are created. The circumstances breeding these ideologies is still there. The next woke wave equivalent is in the shadows. Every civilization that has fallen has shown the same symptoms.
It’s a sexual competition that causes the breakdown of western civilization. You reach a point where female inter-sexual competition reaches a dominant point, and then civilization starts to die.

2/-

>>513823830
Men build things. Infrastructure, knowledge then when we reach a point where mortality rate goes down. Infant mortality in particular. In response to that, women start having fewer babies. As society in general, gets wealthier, the women at the top lose their reproductive advantage over the women below them (less wealthy or honestly, just stupid). So the reproductive advantage of the women at the top disappears. The women at the bottom are also having their babies survive. This is an unstable evolutionary situation. Natural selection is subverted. Now lets be a little more explicit, women at the top (European) have lost their reproductive advantage. And although they don’t really understand why or how, the natural order is demanding they get it back.

So you have European women, with resources and time (remember they are not having more children) trying to recover their genetic advantage. How do they this? They use manipulative sexual suppression. The aim is to force those around them to have fewer children. They denigrate motherhood. They claim motherhood is oppressive and women should get out and work. They must vote. Women need to take part in the way society is run. The way the world is run. They want all the third world genetic trash to believe this too. Because it sounds wonderful. Its an equality statement that very easily resonates. But its shallow and superficial.
This is what is killing European society. Women are now playing the role of men in society. By removing this role for women and giving them mens roles, they are giving up their role as rate limiting breeders. Men are not valuable, yes they can build things and make womens' life easier but as long as there are women giving birth to more smart men, the races future is assured. So its actually women who are responsible for building and maintaining that race.
3/-

>>513823965
If you take this very valuable reproductive capacity and make them play the role that un-valuable men used to do, then you are removing that reproductive capacity for that race and it will eventually disappear.
Its not necessarily a conscious decision by women. The social environment of women is critically important to them. You cant be a woman today and deny feminism. And survive. Women have incredibly strong motives to signal their allegiance to a group. Women who get ostracised by other women can easily be driven to suicide. Which is why more women are found in flaky social advocacy roles than men..
Men will find anything with a pussy, legs and tits fuckable. And low genetic status women will want white partners. The natural order forces them to do this too.

TLDR: Its all genetics although there is an additional complication of usury and capitalism that compounds this. But lets leave that for another day.