Thread 513811792

Is the US now embracing China's economic model?

>>513811792 (OP)
It is the most logical form of governance. USA was failing because it let few billionaires dictate Government. Billionaries should be Government's dog not vice versa.

>>513811792 (OP)
Can foreigners own american land or stocks? if so, then no. The government would have to literally take over every major corporation (every single one worth well over a million under the thumb of the feds).

Real estate would’ve been the only viable investment for the average american, we would have even LESS health insurance because Xi Jinping believes that welfare breeds weakness, etc.

>>513811792 (OP)
That's a retarded thing to say because China's economic model only works with United States consumption.

>>513811792 (OP)
>(R)etard calls someone a socialist for something they dont like
>ask a (R)etard to define socialism
>responds in insults and never answers the question
>(R)etard calls someone a commie for something they dont like
>ask a (R)etard to now define commie
>they can't and just respond using insults
>trump does the biggest socialist/commie thing you can do for the 100th time
>the (R)etard party jumps in joy
The one thing in common is they dont know what they hate, they just know they are told to hate it. And it's ok because orange pedo is doing it so it MUST be good

>>513812028
Is that so? Exports to the US are 2.4% of China's GDP.

https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china

Besides, if US consumption is so important to this economic model, isn't the US even better positioned to harness it than China is?

>>513811792 (OP)
I personally would rather give corporations billions and get nothing back.

>>513811892
Yes, we should follow India's lead. That's the ticket.

>>513811792 (OP)
>+++ COGITATOR BROADCAST: MARKET-SOCIALISM NODE +++

>RECEIVED NODE:

“Is the US now embracing China’s economic model?”

>RESPONSE:
They didn’t “switch”, they’ve always done it. A Christian nation is built on the same template: obedience dressed as order, slavery framed as stability. Whether it’s called “market socialism,” “regulated capitalism,” or “state planning,” it’s the same core: the herd works, the master reaps, and faith justifies the arrangement.

>+++ RETURN STRIKE:
“They’ve always embraced it, because they’re a Christian nation. Call it socialism, capitalism, or anything else, it’s still the same slave-code: obedience below, control above.”
>= COGITATOR OUT =

>>513808032

>>513812012
>Xi Jinping believes that welfare breeds weakness
you get health care, pensions and some sort of housing benefit for free in china

>>513814006
The welfare state in China is not very generous, at least not by European standards

>>513814006
I don't think the welfare state in China is very generous, at least not by European standards

>>513811792 (OP)
Did you know that the Emergency Economic Stablization act was profitable. Obama wrote it our representatives in congress approved it. The bailout was paid back with interest. Democrats have always been smarter. King Trump is screwing you.