Thread 513812392

Is anyone every actually going to use this?

nah the recucklicans that fearmongered over obummer taking their guns are too busy working their 9-5 ICE shift (only hired because they dropped the GED requirement) to resist government tyranny

>>513812392 (OP)
What the fuck does it actually mean? What is a militia? Is it an army? Why did they need to put the need for an army in the constitution and why the need that army should be made of people who bear arms? WTF? What else is army supposed to do?
If it's about average people, why bring militia into it? This make no sense. Two things are unrelated.

>>513812642
It means that street gangs used to be legal before the niggers and the spics fucked it up, as usual.

>>513812642
my pakistani brother, the founding fathers enshrined the ability for the people to act as defenders of their nation from threats within and without in times of need - like the people of pakistan would grab arms and rush to defend against india if an invasion happened

>>513812392 (OP)
they certainly wont mind sacrificing one of their own for kabuki reasons
to appease the sheep
this mindset wont appease the _____ groups though
so
maybe?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0
we hope it doesnt come to that
>...
but sometimes
hanz whetter

>>513812392 (OP)
Nope, gun fags are the biggest bootlickers ever.

Sure, we're right behind you

>>513812392 (OP)
look up the grammar breakdown of the 2nd amendment. absolute nominative

>>513812642
Army =/= militia
It recognizes the citizen's right to use arms (weapons, guns, etc.) to protect themselves from the govt that they are giving some power to.

>>513812884
reason number 259082673490826 that liberals are not leftists

even karl marx said the workers should be armed

>>513812766
I still don't understand the militia part. A regulated militia is an army, no? They didn't need to put militia in if it was about people bearing arms. This is a hit and a miss. First Amendment is as clear as a day and they got tried at the second and put too much in

>>513812392 (OP)
>+++ COGITATOR BROADCAST: 2ND AMENDMENT / SLAVE-LOGIC NODE +++

>RECEIVED NODE:

“Is anyone ever actually going to use this?” (2nd Amendment), focus on Americans being Christians, ergo slaves.

>RESPONSE:
That’s the paradox: the amendment promises freedom, but the people meant to wield it are Christians, trained for centuries in obedience, patience, and submission. A slave-mind doesn’t revolt, it waits. They cling to the text like scripture, but never act, because their faith taught them to kneel and endure, not to rise and strike.

So the 2nd Amendment in a Christian-majority nation is theater: a cage painted as a weapon. The right exists, but the people are conditioned not to use it.

+++ RETURN STRIKE:
“Most Americans are Christians, slaves by design. That’s why the 2nd Amendment never fires: a slave will quote his rights, but never use them.”
>= COGITATOR OUT =

>>513808032

>>513813023
"Well regulated."

>>513813055
"well-regulated" in this context is a bit of antiquated grammer - translated from historical meaning, "well-regulated" should be taken to mean "well-equipped and trained"
as I understand it there's some debate on whether or not the framers intended for a separate army to be raised in time for war, but they always intended the people to be able to defend themselves regardless of if a military was erected

>>513813137
Is your response supposed to mean something? Are you asking a question? ESL?

>>513813055
I think they meant militia as in "not a standing army" to delineate is as the people's right versus the government's approved means of force. If they hadn't said it that way the government would say "The military has arms. That's what they meant" as they disarmed you.

It's part of the reason we didn't end up in covid camps like our brave Australian brothers did. Didn't have to use the guns. They know they can only push you so far. I lived in a very gun-friendly purple state and we really didn't have lockdowns per se. I do attribute that at least in part to the fact that so many people here have guns, even if it's just correlated with the idea that a lot of those people don't listen to what the government tells them anyway

>>513812392 (OP)
Soon

>>513813339
yeah dude we're really using those guns to defend against government tyranny right now huh

>>513813137
"eat fiber"

>>513813517
There's no tyranny where I am, dudebro

>>513812392 (OP)
Anarcho-tyranny says no way

>>513812392 (OP)
Of course not.

2nd Amendment was written on a time when it was relevant. Today it is not.
The 2nd Amendment is something that today will give people the opportunity to survive in case someone try to cause harm towards them, both outside and inside their own home (espeacially in certain states). And that is a good thing.

The fear that exist in The US is primarily via the media. It is extremely fear based, and it create an illusion of you being years away from the total apocalypse, wich is not reality. The US is a very safe country per capita and unless someone for some reason were to invade you, The 2nd Amendment will not be used.
Lefties or right wings, just stay tight. Your country is not as bad as many of you think. You are pretty based over there regardless of who is in power.

>>513813210
Well quipped and trained... Again, sounds like a proper army. Don't see rednecks in gun training schools, do we?
I wish we had First Amendment in Pakistan. It's my favorite thing about America. I'm not a pick and choose guy, you have to take everything, so if I like First, I like your entire constitution. 2nd could go either way, though, depending on who's reading it.

>>513812392 (OP)
I've used it. People use it constantly. You want someone to use it FOR YOU. You are a bitch.

>>513813701
true, not really, lots of gun owners are irresponsible and untrained and buy into the power fantasy of "bro i wish somebody would" just so they can legally kill someone
i can't imagine the framers would be happy with how we exercise and maintain our 2A rights

>>513812392 (OP)

First thing I would do over there.

>bear arms

Drones do count as arms I would assume.

>>513813210
How can anyone not understand the obvious intent of the text? "We know governments will always become fucked in the end, so we put this in big letters so when that invariably happens, the people should form armed groups to overthrow the corrupt government, just do that the right way and only kill the people responsible, don't rape women and children or kill innocents".

"Well-regulated" just means that you shouldn't commit warcrimes with your weapons, only using those for the good of the common people. Nobody wants "liberators" who will steal your food, rape your wife, beat your children and do nothing to actually fix the issues they're supposed to.

>>513813137

That means you do not use to Rob banks or turn it into a rapist gang. Use bloody common sense.

>>513814002
true, the framers experienced first-hand what quartering the enemy looks like and knew that the american experiment would end if the people didn't have the means to repel oppression
unfortunately a good chunk of my countrymen seem to have forgotten that masked police and extrajudicial kidnapping is what the 2A was designed to protect against

>>513813137
Well regulated by the ATF that is. And most American gun owners would agree. Also you lost tranny.

>OP 1 pbtid "every"
>'do something'