Thread 513813654

Bring back monarchy!

That would be nice

You are a gay. My IQ is 140

>>513813654 (OP)
>>513813770
No fuck you. We ditched that shit for a reason. Go back to the UK if you love monarchy so much.

>>513813654 (OP)
Why the fuck would I want a corrupt figurehead with unlimited power when the corrupt figureheads with limited power do enough damage, you retards? Are you submissive faggot simps who need a master to tell you what to do? Go get some BDSM fag to humiliate you already.

>>513813849
They don't have monarchy. They have a pathetic parody of it that most of the time feels designed to mock monarchy.

>>513813923
How exactly is their power limited? That's just something we say, it's not a reality we live.

>>513813654 (OP)
Monarchy only works if the giant alien anti gravitational space ships are stationed right about the kings castle, that boost morale...

do you think Egyptians would have that many slaves working whifingy by what?

Posting in a frog thread.
>are baited
FUCK YOU OP!!! WE WILL BRING BACK STONE WHEEL CHIEF

>>513813849
Yeah hate your neighbor for being a different political party instead of everyone hating the king and overthrowing him. Good goy

>>513813654 (OP)

What do you mean bring back? Most European countries still have them because Whites are le epic sheep race.

>>513813654 (OP)
King Charles is a WEF pawn. The glorious kings of the past are long gone.

>>513813944
>actually that wasn't REAL monarchy.
You are a spiritual communist.

>>513814173
I won't take spiritual talk from a democrat seriously. You are simply soulless and without any sort of spirit altogether. And anyway, whether the UK was once a monarchy is a different question to whether they are now. They aren't. They're a republic that refuses to admit it.

>>513813923
Monarchs aren't corrupt faggot.

>>513814173
Republicans are closer to communists than monarchists.

>>513814311
Um, you voted for a pedophile.

>>513814452
As do we all.

>>513814160
Charles is illegitimate the real king is Simon Abney-Hastings 15th Earl of Loudoun.

>>513814452
You are low IQ.

>>513814311
Sorry but you don't get to pick and choose who is and is not a true monarch. That's kind of the whole point, actually. If you get stuck with an impotent King Charles, sorry! Deal with it.

>>513813770
Sure, if you're a cuck who enjoys being told what to do. Most of the current "we need a Monarchy in the US" messaging comes from a kike who simply doesn't want you to be able to have any say in governance, considering you probably don't own enough land/ property/ assets to be given lord status.

>>513813654 (OP)
hello fellow white. indians eat shit and pakistanis are just northern indians. also, friendly reminder that bagladeshis (banglapoos) are indian. also fuck jews.

Monarchy is no different then democracy.
The truthnuke is elitism(aristocracy) vs populism(the rest)

>>513813654 (OP)
Curtis yarvin is a shitskin btw

>>513814644
It's not about the selection of leadership, it's about the definition of words. The British DO select their leadership, for all the good it's done them (none at all). In any normal circumstance this would be called democracy or republicanism, but they love their little LARP.

>>513813654 (OP)
As long as they're required to take a leisurely, publicly announced, and unguarded stroll through a different city within their domain every 3 months.

>>513814778
Ok then, here's the deal. You move back to Britain, Parliamentary elections are permanently suspended, and whoever is currently in the House of Commons is there forever. Deal?

>>513814711
I agree with you. We need elitism.

I favour aristocracy as the best engine of cultural and intellectual refinement: concentrated wealth, leisure, and standards of taste allow a minority to create the ornaments of civilisation that others later enjoy. Yet aristocracy carries the danger of arrogance, and unchecked political despotism stifles art and thought—so it must be tempered by a tolerable measure of liberty. The ideal aristocracy is elastic and meritocratic, open to anyone who proves aesthetically or intellectually fit, and demonstrates superiority through superior work and behaviour rather than ostentation. Democracies and mob rule, having no strong incentive for high achievement, tend to live off and eventually exhaust what aristocracy produces. Thus government should protect an independent, cultured elite enough to create and sustain civilisation, while remaining kind, accessible, and restrained.

>>513814908
That's not monarchy either. That would just be a republican dictatorship. Which would still be better than what they have since what they have has never brought them any good.

>>513814353
>muh kings can’t do anything wrong

You’re worse than politician dick riders.

>>513814998
>Actually monarchy is specifically when people I like are in charge and they operate in the specific way that I want them to.
Not how this works!

>>513814045
Western governments are too splintered and fragmented SPECIFICALLY to avoid a single person having too much control over the system. I don’t even know why I have to explain this, this is fucking basic.

>>513815108
Most Monarchy dick riders have next to zero clue outside from what their discordsisters have told them.

>>513815108
No, monarchy is when a familial dynasty rules and inherits rule genetically. Not when some politician, who has not been bred and groomed to be the monarch, inherits power from a politburo who selects him for extraneous reasons in the wake of suspended elections. That is closer to the Roman Republic's form of dictatorship, which, again, is still better than democracy. But what isn't?

>>513815141
They are that way because of the systems of government that prevail in our age, not because we have a special type of human beings in them that are incapable of better systems of government. This age can pass like any other.

>>513815327
Sure, and that’s how we have more of this type of governments now and most monarchies are fucking dead.

>>513813654 (OP)
for monarchy to work you need the correct ruler. monarchy by itself means fucking shit

>>513815426
Zoom out farther to before those monarchies died, and before they were born, and what do you see? An ancient world filled with democracies and republics that died and gave way to monarchies. You only think you'll be on top forever because you are right now, an extraordinary ignorance.

>>513814117
Frogposting is trad and chill

>>513815543
> republics that died and gave way to monarchies

Lmao, and then we zoom in on monarchies and its not hard to see what gives way to republics all over again.

>>513813654 (OP)
What is a monarch if not a fancy shabbos goy?See william of orange

>>513815712
What's funny about it? The ancient world was replete with republics and democracies and they all failed and made room for an era of monarchies, and in that era mankind flourished like never before. At best your argument is that these systems of government are cyclical, which still doesn't lend itself to the idea that you'll be on top forever, just that you'll be on top until the current cycle ends.

>>513815863
>muh flourished

Monarchies? LMAO. America flourished more under their own government than they did under British monarchy. America is the best example against shit monarchies. Governments and monarchies will never improve society and only retard bootlickers believe otherwise.

>>513813654 (OP)
King Gavin I? Queen Hillary? Raja Vivek? Take your pick.

>>513816008
Nonsense. America was born under monarchy. It was peopled by monarchy. All the infrastructure that made rebellion possible was built under the guidance of monarchs. The American republic didn't fall from a tree like a fruit. It is a fruit that grew from the tree of monarchy. And where has the journey led us? Soullessness, globalism, the shitification of the American people through mass migration, etc. Perhaps the cycle is nearing its end.

>>513816205
>muh cope

America has lasted linger outside monarchy than in it. And look at British monarchy now? Lmao. Hell not a single monarchy in the world that matters half a shit for obvious reasons.

>>513813654 (OP)

Forget monarchism, we need National Socialism.

>>513816303
Depends on how you define that. If you define it only by the British monarchy, which was late to the game, then sure. But not if you define it by the other European monarchies who began colonizing the Americas much earlier, peopling this land with Europeans. And what does longevity matter anyway? Colonialism was still done by monarchies, not by republics (with the erstwhile exception of Holland). And again, where did republicanism lead? Horror. Why should the duration of horror be more significant than the horror itself? Also you just keep repeating yourself that monarchy is not on top at the moment, but we've already established that this is cyclical. There was a time when republics/democracies faltered and monarchies rose to take their place. There is no reason under the sun to believe it can't or won't happen again.

>>513816620
>republic dies: inevitable
>monarchy dies: uhhhhhhhh its just a fluke

Its always good to know that konarchy lovers get all their talking points from social media, every time. How are you clamoring for a government system that was never good and that you didn’t and will never experience in your lifetime, like fucking commies lmao.

>>513814711
But a monarch is a counterweight to the aristocrats or oligarchs that shit on the populace too much.

>>513816811
The monarchies collude with the aristocrats you stupid fuck. Kings and nobles have always been a thing LMAOOOOO.

>>513816800
Who said it was a fluke? At no point did I say or imply that. You totally made that up out of thin air. It was very much not a fluke, it was a deliberate effort to tear down monarchies and replace them at the hands of violent republican terrorists. All I am suggesting to you is that we have no reason to believe that vandalism is permanent. Also to say monarchy produced no good is simply absurd, I won't even dignify such ahistoricism beyond that. Sheer nonsense.

>>513816972
>it was a deliberate effort to tear down monarchies and replace them at the hands of violent republican terrorists

LMAO. Or maybe the kingdom was mismanaged and corrupt for so long that people stopped giving a shit about the kingdom being under siege or whatever the fuck? Like people who hate their own government?? WINK FUCKING WINK. The cope is insane.

>>513813654 (OP)
How would that help anybody but the rich?

>>513817108
That's merely a reason for why republican terrorists were republican terrorists, it's not at all an explanation of how they weren't republican terrorists. And now that terrible corruption you pretend to be against is represented by republics, not monarchies, as you're so proud of boasting about until right now suddenly.

>>513817232
>muh terrorists

Should we call YOU a terrorist for wanting to overthrow this government for another one due to it being inefficient????

>>513816811
What are you talking about? Under monarchy, only nobles matter. Commoners are no better than fly shit.

>>513817370
Who said anything about inefficiency? You just keep making things up, it's strange. And sure, you can call me whatever you'd like. Why would that bother me?

>>513813654 (OP)
I'm going to be the king of canada

>>513817449
Then din’t worry about “republic terrorists” in your brain and get back to reality. Actually READ about monarchies before you start believing that kings actually gave a fuck about people or some stupid shit like that.

>>513813654 (OP)
>until the king's last name is schlomo

>>513817524
I'm not worried about them, and you're the one who doesn't seem to have done any reading. You have a paint-by-numbers understanding of monarchy that is clearly derived from systemic brainwashing and not actual independent investigation. You keep talking about how monarchs don't care about their subjects but having lived my entire life under this rotten system I have not seen a single shred of evidence that politicians care one iota about their citizens. You should go argue with a mirror.

>>513813654 (OP)
My flag arrived in the mail today
It features 4 stars, one for each life lost on january 6th,
a broken white circle to represent the US congress, a red cross at the center to remind ourself that St. Ashli (yet to be canonized)
gave her life to bring it under the control of the roman catholic church.

Its based on the prior jan 6 flag which had no positive vision for the future
https://www.adl.org/resources/article/far-right-extremists-memorialize-martyr-ashli-babbitt

For the US to survive she has to become a catholic empire and groypers will be resented for their leading role in that process.

>>513817654
>I have not seen a single shred of evidence that politicians care one iota about their citizens
Do they teach logic in schools anymore?
The fact that politicians don’t care about constituents under a constitutional republic does not imply that kings care about commoners under monarchy.

>>513813849
>We ditched that shit for a reason.
to worship aristocrats(capitalist class/political class/jews) instead of monarchs, good goy

>>513817856
So then why do you cling so dearly to a system you can't even defend? The incentive structure under monarchy is better. Whether the monarch "cares" in some trivial sentimental sense for his subjects is beside the point. He has incentives to keep his kingdom in tact, to keep his people unified, to preserve the traditions and the ethics that make his reign possible in the first place, whereas politicians have only the incentives of grasping for powering and holding it as long as they can to enrich themselves, and will, and do, throw traditions, ethics, and everything else into a grinder to chase that enrichment.

What capitalism has done to the west can never be forgiven.

>>513818042
I apologize for my poor English in this post.

>>513818042
>He has incentives to keep his kingdom in tact, to keep his people unified, to preserve the traditions and the ethics that make his reign possible in the first place
Oh this is just wignat mythmaking that prosperity and a comfortable life for common people stems from ethnic unity.
What does a monarch care for ethnic unity when they believe they are literally ordained by God to rule?

>>513818507
ethnic unity strengthen collective bargaining powers
thats why tyrants and amazon spread ethnic diversity

philia is necessary for democracy

>>513818507
The alternative is a mish-mash boarding house of competing cultures, interests, and races who have nothing in common but proximity, which leads to the abandonment of shared traditions and all the horrors that follow. I don't think I need to detail those horrors because we live them, since that is the predicament in which we now find ourselves.

>>513816869
>>513817391
Thank God that Americans are here to explain to me the realities of various monarchic systems throughout European history.

>>513818931
They don't know anything about monarchy except what they were told in high school by some double digit IQ roastie teacher who also never read a history book that didn't start with George Washington. It's pure taught reaction.

>>513813654 (OP)
retard

>>513816591
why not both

>>513813923
Because being part of the personal property of a corrupt asshole is better than being the people they squeeze to increase it.

>>513813849
>We ditched that shit for a reason.
No, "we" didn't. The Jews did.

>>513822448
WW1 truly did a number on Europe