>>513911335 (OP)
Anon there are far more egregious sins to fixate on than tolerating a murder as far as the laws concerned. If everyone’s guilty why do you think someone mistakenly believing they have to forgive someone that murdered their children is biblically accurate?
These threads always end up on /bant/ the moment someone points out that biblically, the guy could either kill or spare the murderer and the result will be the same. The only difference is whether or not that person ever believes the gospel at any point in their life.
The focus is entirely fixated on whether or not they believe. No one is moral, so that’s just a subtle misdirection that is deliberately done on the (totally just trolling OP)’s part.
Everyone who didn’t trust what Jesus did to be enough for them will be judged by a law in which all will be found guilty because none of them are God.
The law can’t save. Even if you kill the murderer righteously. Another takes his place because of the temptation. When man has the law in mind, he tries to enforce it himself, and will always fuck it up.
That’s why the kikes are using Masonic legalistic use of the law to build a world government for Satan because they don’t give a shit about God. They want to worship themselves in vanity. This is why kikes hate Christ, because he disallows them to boast in what ever small shit they do right, because it’s just gonna turn into a train wreck at the end of it anyway.
You’re not saved or good because of what you do. You’re justified if you simply BELIEVE the gospel. Religion fags will always accuse believers are enabling bad behavior when Gods point was man was doing that REGARDLESS of the knowledge of it. Religion, the very thing that atheists hate, is anti-God and unironically more dangerous morally speaking because of its satanic subtlety of using the law to conflate righteousness with action.