IQ and the normalized distribution across the major races - even accounting for differences in cultures and environment - is one of the biggest most indisputable redpills in the last 30 years; the most obvious fact as to why artificial racial integration will never naturally succeed since IQ is strongly linked to genetics. And yet no one really wants to talk about it. The left are desperate to play IQ as "that weird Mensa thing that isn't really predictive of individual success" and we on the right don't even talk about it nearly as much as it should be talked about.

How do we bring this topic further into mainstream?

Havent seen this graph in a long time. I will reiterate the fact that /pol/ detests: All available evidence strongly suggests these differences or at least the vast majority of them are the result of socioeconomic pressures in black communities.

>>513917320 (OP)
Many on the right dont talk about it bc a lot of them are also failed humans on the dumber end of the iq spectrums so its embarrassing for them to admit to being a retarded white.
>>513917494
This is wrong. Poor Asians outperform nogs to an extreme degree. Socioeconomic factors are a small part of it.

>>513917616
>failed humans
Some aren't fully human.

>>513917616
Well no one has ever been able to provide any rigorous evidence of your beliefs. Your unsourced claims about "Poor asians" vs "poor blacks", for example, even if I'm being generous by assuming its true, is an intentional oversimplification of a situation which ignores nuances and contextual realities

>>513917494
>>513917808
BTW very few people on /pol/ are white :| ...

>>513917808
Bc IQ racial analysis has been demonized in scientific consensus so you will hardly find good research from scientists willing to risk their careers on "problematic" topics. But even so there are some studies in Africa about the Flynn effect and the minimal incremental gains seen even with improved access to education or better environments for schooling. Its cope to think you can teach retarded people to the point that they naturally close the standard deviation gap

>>513917494
This is cope

>>513917320 (OP)
Remember they lowered the definitional standard medically because blacks were mostly idiots

>>513918165
You tell me its "cope" for an idea you hold that no one in the history of science has been able to provide 1 shred of rigorous evidence for. So who is the cope?
>>513918150
Thats all you can ever do is say "its all a big conspiracy against me" even though thats something thats obviously not happening. If you have evidence then people would listen to your evidence, and it still wouldnt make any difference about whether or not black people were treated with human rights but people would still listen to it. The problem is you have zero evidence

>>513917616
Because poor Asian kids go home and do homework + study all night. Poor Black kids hang out in the street.

To be honest with all of you, I am a white dude and am fairly unapologetically white as well, but I have more or less come to the conclusion that the world will be better served by a racemixed future. For 1 reason mainly: its the only way people are ever going to stop fighting over race

Just get it over with and have the human race evolve in to something new

>>513918269
>>513918382
Dumb bait

>>513918431
It isnt bait 1 bit. it is my genuine belief

>>513917320 (OP)
I am off that graph. Feels good man.

>Whites are hecking high IQ
>t. white people

>>513918431
>>513918455
Tell me why its wrong and I am speaking specifically about the racemixing future

>>513918269
It's not a conspiracy, even the original authors of the Bell Curve talk about how extremely polarizing it is to do this research on a macro scale. You are trying to deny the reality of genetics and how it plays into your existence if you think you can explain or teach away these IQ gaps. You dont have to be a racist to accept that blacks are dumber on average than white or Asians. In fact, its necessary for leftists to accept this bc you need to find a way to increase the general IQ of blacks in western countries if successful integration is the goal.

>>513918382
Oh hey Linus

I think as white people we seriously need to reorient ourselves. We are in a culture that prides itself on its literacy and dismisses the rest of humanity as violent. And yet they are the ones seizing our lands while we talk about it on the net. Surely our literacy will not trump their violence.

>>513918496
Furries have naturally higher iqs bro, go to one of their conventions and ask them what their day jobs are. Lots of engineers.

>>513918455
>It's not bait, I just happen to say the dumbest things because I genuinely believe them
I'm guessing you're on the side of op

>>513918502
>It isnt a conspiracy
>Immediately goes on to invoke a conspiracy against him
It always this way with you because your views are not based on facts, and you talk out of both sides of your mouth in order to avoid being pinned down in highly manipulative ways. You have not 1 shred of evidence for any of what you just wrote

>>513918269
>If you have evidence then people would listen to your evidenc

are you naive or just retarded?

>>513918382
>the world will be better served by a racemixed future

oh, retarded

>>513918586
Well just tell me why I'm wrong? The 1 mathematical constant in our universe is change. "Change" is literally our most fundamental law in our reality. You need to accept change and you have an entire human history of people warring with eachother over the color of their skin, and you have America falling apart in the face of these culturewars, so how am I wrong that humanity would be better served by just becoming fully racemixed thus ending the fighting?

>>513918662
>>513918620
"Ur retarded" this is your answer. Theres just nothing for you to say because your claims are based on 0 evidence and fact

>>513918269
The evidence is literally test scores, you worthless fucking retard. Blacks in western European countries also score similarly to blacks in America, and they dont have the cultural baggage of slavery like American blacks do.

>>513918382
>Just get it over with and have the human race evolve in to something new

You have no idea how much I hate idiots like you

>>513918678
Your change is being demanded by other races, with 0 willingness to change on their end.
Stop being a cuck retard, idiot.

>>513918734
"The evidence is test scores" you say, but we are specifically discussing the socioeconomic stresses that result in the test scores, so you are just not a very serious person and your response is not very serious

>>513918501
Better and worse are subjective. Your opinion isn't even worse addressing.
There is only truth and reality, which is that genetics governs how the brain develops and functions, which in turn directly relates to intelligence.
It would be an epic cosmic coincidence if the races were all of equal intelligence. And it's not just intelligence, there's also personality differences etc

>>513918762
No answer and if you were really concerned about world IQ then you would remedy all of the socioeconomic stresses that you are intentionally inflicting on other races in order to drive their IQs down generationally, and keep them under your thumb.

>>513918769
I don't know where "domination" comes in to this discussion we are having. I mean especially when white people have been pretty dominant over black and brown people for all of modern history

>>513918717
The evidence and facts are the results of IQ tests, which are 99% accurate with the development level of all countries where they are used.

Also, you've never in your fucking life met someone with an IQ of 80 or less than 100 who isn't an idiot.

Do you know retarded people with IQs of 100 or higher? No, because the test works.

>>513918801
Well again no matter how many times you emptily repeat yourself, you still have no evidence for even one of your assertions.

>>513918678
>Well just tell me why I'm wrong?
You are wrong because genetics affects intelligence and genetics varies by race.
>The 1 mathematical constant in our universe is change.
No, there are other constants. Ever heard of pi?
>the color of their skin
Race goes beyond skin color, brainlet. Again - bait or retard.
>how am I wrong that humanity would be better served by just becoming fully racemixed thus ending the fighting?
This was about intelligence and race, not your race mixed dream. I'm not against race mixing inherently - but that doesn't change the fact that niggers have lower intelligence, retard

>>513918907
We are already into the "we are just repeating ourselves now becuz /pol/acks have no responses when called out on their bullshit, so they just emptily doubledown and pretend to ignore what you said" phase of the thread now. Every /pol/ thread eventually comes to this if theres a leftist involved. So I'll just link back to the comment where I already responded to this statement from you, directly >>513918788

>>513918788
"Socioeconomic stressors" which are again picked by people with high or low IQ circling back to just how much of an idiot are you. You can't just delude your way out of never considering the truth without looking braindead.

>>513918915
>you got a single source to back that up?!
The source is I'm not a moron like you

>>513918975
see >>513918984 we are in this phase of the thread now where its time for me to leave because you are just buckbroken and repeating yourselves. This is what you do when you have no answers to leftists statements, you ignore them and put your comments on repeat

>>513918788
I feel sorry for you

>>513917616
>Poor Asians outperform nogs
It's not just about being poor. Niggers actively police their communities for intellectual pursuits, ostracizing any black person showing interest or even ability for higher reasoning than average 70IQ hoodrat for "acting white".

>>513919010
Oh wow, source is "I'm not a moron like you", wow that sounds like a really authoritative source. Real convincing. Is that peer-reviewed too?

>>513917494
Even the children of wealthy niggers are on average significantly less intelligent than the children of white trash. Read "The Bell Curve" again.

>>513918872
That comes from a misread on your part, at best.

>>513919041
Not even a good impression of a leftist. Bad bait. Cya

> one of the few non-1pbtid threads in catalog
> insufferable glowing faggot barges in
twin studies have vanished overnight I presume

>>513919048
Get redpilled

>>513918872
Whites developed and improved the lives of the entire fucking planet.

Medicine, education, liberalism... all products of whites.

Thanks to whites, you live better today than any African king in history who didn't live more than 40 years.

And now you come and tell us we ruined the world for you? What have you done other than kill each other in cannibalistic wars throughout history? Nothing.

Die.

>>513919078
Low IQ nigger can't understand that logical arguments don't need "sources"

>>513919048
again see above >>513918788 and >>513918984 where I talk about how you are just at the point of repeating yourselves listlessly now becuz its what /pol/ does when its BTFO
>>513919000
I do not even know what this means dude. Too incoherent for me to even respond to. Reformat your comment into something readable and I will respond.

>>513917494
I researched this debate back in 2016, with all my autism operating at full capacity to uncover the truth of this matter, while wanting to believe that there is a strong environmental factor at play because my first friends were black and grew up in a ghetto area full of dysfunctional black families, and can say without question, you are wrong. If I remember correctly, the data from twin studies suggests that environment can not account for anywhere near a full standard deviation difference in IQ. Also, me and my siblings grew up in the same environment with a similar socio-economic status with a childhood of neglect and abuse, yet have far higher IQ average than even average whites or east asian. Environment is only a small factor for ethnic deviation in avg iq.

>>513919116
Or the fact that even in the UK, they've analyzed PISA scores for differences between racial groups, immigrants, natives, whites, non-whites and they still fucking reached the same conclusions that raycis /pol/ anons talk about.

>>513919160
Yeah? Your argument wasnt a "logical argument" though. You made an abjectly baseless scientific assertion. So thats an irrelevant excuse.
>>513919133
You do not yourself even believe colonialism was "benevolent" obviously

>>513919093
Theres no hard evidence to back up your claim no matter how much you repeat it anon

>>513919259
No I didn't. Where's your source that I did?

>>513919107
Nope. No one misread you. Your bullshit just did not make any sense

>>513919230
>U R wrong because I have a massive debilitating cognitive deficiency and I say U R wrong
This was your post, man. Thats the cringeworthy idea your post just communicated to me

>>513918984
I'm going to explain to you why you black people are doing sooooo badly. You have no self-awareness or self-criticism. What you have is the "high self-esteem of the retarded."

You hear what you want to hear, you believe what you want to believe, what they tell you doesn't matter to you, they're all wrong and idiots, everything you do wrong is someone else's fault.

- The test says that Chinese and Jews are, on average, smarter.

White people: Oh, okay, that makes sense given their development.

Black people: Tyrone Smash

>>513917494
>"all available evidence..."
>objectively wrong opinion substantiated by nothing

Why bother to claim to know that research overwhelmingly supports your position when you obviously haven't researched it? The Minnesota trans-racial adoption study directly contradicts your poorly-informed opinion, as do test scores compared between white and black students stratified by parents' income.

See: Myth #5

Point to a single study that supports your position. Prove that you have researched this as you claim you have.

>>513919307
>Where's your source for my comments in this very thread
Thats nice anon. Are you this buttmad? Are we done here now?

>>513917320 (OP)
>>513917494
Meaningless.
I now know why I was so strongly drawn to biochemistry; I can offer people who reject dishonor and degeneracy the gift of genetically enhanced children. I will remove their greatest natural limitation in exchange for the embrace of virtue. And all others will perish in their wake.

>>513918589
It's genetic, you're coping. The socioeconomic factors are minimal. This has been studied at length.

>>513919412
Here's more support

>>513919412
Unfortunately cherrypicking a bunch of graphs and putting them in to your 4chan infograph that you think "owns the libs", doesn't actually stand to the rigor of science and there are a great many confounding variables you are leaving off of those studies.

Actually evolution only made us look different but had zero effect on our behaviors or minds. That's psuedoscience to think otherwise. If you disagree I'd like to see a source before I waste my time with this racist nonsense.

>>513919429
>comments
You made a system about my claims, but you've given no source or evidence

>>513919180
Can't even read a correction of your terms used and logically sound furtherance of your consideration. Very sad. Read a fucking book. Start with the goddamned quoted text so you won't sound like a fucking idiot misusing a broken term. You don't need to reply to me, you're a fucking moron.

>>513918569
>puppy fags
>furries
Sure, not everyone is up to speed on the taxonomy of degenerates, but if you dismiss them as "duhh it's all the same", you have low IQ. That said, there is some overlap in puppy fags and furries as puppy fags recruit poorfag furries by basically saying "you get to keep a cheaper animal mask while getting railed in the ass, deal?"

>>513919450
Its been studied at length and the entire scientific community disagrees with you. But tell me about how thats all a jewish conspiracy or whatever. And that the holocaust didnt happen and that climate change is a fiction and that the earth is flat.

>>513917320 (OP)
jews are still smarter than you, retards.

>>513919580
You're wrong, and you know you're wrong.

>>513919512
Anon you are so apoplectic with rage right now that you cannot even type anymore. I have no concept of what you are even trying to say other than that you are buttmad

>>513918845
Underrated and exquisite bait.

>>513919596
You're brown.

>>513919524
Your post is verbally incoherent to the point where I cannot decipher it

>>513917494
>>513917616
wrong

>>513919625
You haven't even provided evidence that I've even made a post

>>513917494
Lol.
Lmao.
It's also socioeconomic factors that cause jews to continue to be blindingly stupid mouthbreathers despite studying for every IQ test they ever took.

>>513919412
Here's an expanded version. Notice the graphs at the bottom control for socioeconomic background.

>>513917808

>>513917494
so true, we should test natives in african countries and compare
oh no anon, it's even lower

>>513919509
Right but I addressed this, in part, in 1 of the 1st comments in this thread >>513917808. I mean theres no comparison between a poor white family living in a rural area, where they probably own land and property, and a poor black family living in an urban one who is renting and facing various forms of racism through the 1980s, for example

>>513919596
But i am a jew. They sucked my bloody mutilated infant penis and everything!

>>513919661
It isn't verbal, genius.

I'm brown and dumb

>>513917808
>>513919728

>>513919259
No, it wasn't "benevolent."

Did you know that the Turks had a lot of black slaves? Do you know why there aren't any black people in Turkey? Because they castrated them before taking them.

Why don't you go to them and demand reparations? Do you know why? Because they'll laugh in your face

>>513919745
Yeah you have 2 populations of black people, primarily. African Americans, and Africans. And you have colonialism in 1 + slavery and Jim Crow in another. Mind you that Jim Crow was only 60 years ago. It wasnt something far off in the past. Anyone black over 60 lived in that world.

>>513917494
27 posts by this retarded faggot nigger

it's genetic. what does that mean exactly? I'll elaborate.
it's 90% genetic in the American sample. and the remaining 10% can't be fixed by any social intervention because it consists of factors like "is surrounded by stupid black people all the time"

>>513919661
>read
>a correction
>of your terms used
>and(this denotes a separate clause!)
>logically sound(this is a descriptor!)
>furtherance(hey, I bet you could find that in a dictionary)
So what you're saying is you are dyslexic and fundamentally incapable of dealing with your disability.
Aka, a fucking retard.

>>513917808
>>513919788
>>513919728

>>513919510
This is just low IQ sophistry. Post an image or link to an article supporting your position to demonstrate that you hve researched this as you claim you have, thus demonstrating that people should take your opinion seriously when you say scientific consensus is on your side.

>>513919728
see >>513919510 and >>513919750 and >>513917808. I mean this has been directly responded to you already. If you choose to keep on reposting it then its just like I have said above when I talk about how you repeat yourselves.

>>513919327
Explain to me why you introduced a word "domination" and claimed I said it to you. Because you deluded it into being and falsely claim others introduced it.

>>513919835

>>513918907
>Do you know retarded people with IQs of 100 or higher?
I got tested by several hour long test administered by a psychiatrist, and while not giving an exact score it rated me at 1 in 20 bracket. So not genius level but still two standard deviations above average. Yet there is a lot concepts I can't grasp that I know to be relatively simple. Like even high school math was tricky for me, and that absolutely isn't something you'd need over 1 in 20 IQ to grasp.

>>513919843
"see >>513919510 and >>513919750 and >>513917808. I mean this has been directly responded to you already. If you choose to keep on reposting it then its just like I have said above when I talk about how you repeat yourselves."

Note the people who ran the Minnesota Transracial Adoption studies, themselves, do not share your conclusions. And those studies showed socioeconomic factors WERE the result of the IQ differences.

>>513919873
see >>513919788

>>513919923
In 1350, the orange ID nigger remembered the 40s and promptly made his way to /diy/.

You are seeing in this thread what passes for /pol/ack "science". Basically "I took a screenshot of a cherrypicked graph that shows a very tiny portion of information, now I am gonna post it and try to make dumb believe this is science." Same thing they did with vaccines, germ theory or anything else.

>>513919990

>>513920005
Wow, more /pol/ack pseudoscience that you think is supposed to impress me >>513920042

>>513920061
>>513920042

>>513920042
>I cherrypicked my opinion of niggers from what the people on the shiny flashing mesmerizing lights told me to, so that means you cherrypicked your information too!

>>513917320 (OP)

Orange ID retard hasn't posted a single piece of evidence or study as to why IQ is fake btw

>>513920042
you haven't refuted anything with any evidence whatsoever. Anyone with a functioning brain knows that niggers are subhuman and retarded. Its not even a debate, its intuitive. Go spend any time around them at all.

>>513920042
Desperate attempts to pull the more logical card when they can't even get the basics of terminology correct.
Retard behavior.

The only thing they can do is take screenshots of graphs from studies that have been disregarded as methodologically flawed, and then refuse to recognize the methodological flaws

>>513920101
>cherrypicked graph
refute anything in the graph, show me what is cherrypicked

>>513917320 (OP)
>afro-americans are a couple IQ points above indians
Those fecaloids are utterly worthless

>>513920185
Name the studies that were "methodologically flawed" and cite the opposing studies with the clear evidence that says why those studies were flawed.

>>513920105
Huh? Who are you even talking to, dude?
>>513920123
You are pseudoscientists on /pol/ who take screenshots of refuted studies which were known to contain methodological flaws, like the Minnesota adoption studies anons posted above, and then you refuse to recognize the methodological flaws. Its the mindcontrol trick you use on people with your pseudoscience, anytime scientific topics arise

>>513920185
>disregarded as methodologically flawed
disregarded by whom, and what are the methodological flaws? Be specific

>>513920185
>I heard the phrase "methodological flaw"
>that means that the person saying it is never lying or mistaken
You are in the midst of a methodological flaw right now. You are seeking to convince people of something they learned was incorrect years ago.
How fucking new are you? How was your summer vacation? Looking forward to school?
If you are, in fact, not underage, please consider the fact that you come across as an ignorant child.

>>513920284
>You are pseudoscientists
more buzzwords. Come on, anon. Provide the refutations please. Be specific.

>>513920272
The Minnesota adoption study which you have widely cited above was one example of a study which was known to have been methodologically flawed in terms of demonstrating your conclusion. The authors of the study themselves have spent decades telling people they do not agree with your conclusions and that your conclusions are wrong. However it DID demonstrate that significant portions of the IQ gap are directly attributable to socioeconomic factors. So basically you took a study that proves you wrong but screencapped misleading portions of it and then posted it on 4chan to push your agenda. Very typical

>>513920284
>Huh?
That's about the response I expect when you actually understand.
>but feathers are lighter than steel

>>513920122
I dunno man, I got tested to be two standards deviations (of 15) above average and I'm a retarded mess. And honestly me thinking my singular anecdote should be used as a basis for wider conclusions about how IQ is overrated should only prove my retardedness.

>>513920385
I didn't cite the Minnesota study, retard. Keep up with the IDs

>>513920344
But again, see '>>513919510 and >>513919750 and >>513917808'. I have directly responded to this so many times and obviously it is SO misleading to compare families in the 80s, or white rural families who own land with urban black families who don't, and who were living under Jim Crow, and had no schooling, and so forth

>>513917320 (OP)
Look how much higher the black IQ is. Whitey btfo

>>513920385
Please provide a source for your refutation and then find the same for the dozens of other graphs posted. It seems as if you're cherrypicking.

>>513920122
Hopefully he's just here to farm for race/IQ charts, otherwise this is absolutely tragic

>>513919990
No, that study does not show (i presume you meant to say) that IQ gaps were the result of socioeconomic differences. It shows the opposite. The childrens' IQs were more similar to those of their biological parents than their adoptive ones.

All available evidence points in the opposite direction of what you suggest. Provide evidence to support your position already.

>>513920385
>Nooo stop...stop INTERPRETING OUR DATA! HOW DARE you actually draw meaningful conclusions from our work we tried to abandon as soon as we noticed!
Please understand, brainlet.
"Statistically significant" and "significant" are not synonyms.
One means "has an effect." The other means "has a major/dominant effect."
Words. They FUCKING MEAN THINGS.

>>513920454
No. The Minnesota study is the ONLY study of any significant relevance that any of you have to cite since its the only one which exists, and this is where you pull the vast majority of your data from. Your ID is irrelevant to me and your personal individual posts as a person are irrelevant to me

>>513920456
none of that is a refutation. "Racism" does not force people to slaughter their neighbors. Please provide any sort of actual objective refutation. Claiming some invisible boogeyman of racism causes blacks to murder at ridiculous rates is insulting, and denied. If you can't prove it mathematically, your argument is bullshit.

>>513920459
Made me chuckle. Well done sir.

"I'm being socioeconomically stressed! Halp! You're doing science wrong! It's only science when it agrees with me!"

>>513920506
No. We're just in to the point now where you repeat your lies once theyve been dispelled, as is normal for pol. The Minnesota study's own authors have spent decades BTFOing people who make the claims you make

>>513920385
What the authors, who, if I recall correctly, said that "some knowledge is not worth knowing" had to say about the results of their study is worthless. The results are what matter. It also did not demonstrate that, in fact, it demonstrated the exact opposite.

>>513918382
Hey Rabbi: open borders for Israel.

Stop fighting it. Let Israel become something new.

>>513920581
Its refutation of the pseudoscientific materials you posted above. Absolutely. Say "no its not" but no matter how many graphs you post or repost, youre beaten

>>513920678
>once theyve been dispelled
you haven't dispelled a single fucking thing. You have not posted one study, source, NOTHING. You are such a disingenuous fucking retard, its insane.

>>513920678
>>513920536
>>513920385
>>513920284
>>513920185
>>513920456
>>513920709

>>513920709
>refutation
Well, at least you learned that word. Sadly, "debunk" is not a synonym. Please exercise greater care in your attempts at logic.

>>513920536
You have virtually no evidence to support your position. You have claimed your position is a scientific consensus, yet you apparently cannot provide one study to support it, demonstrating that even if it were a scientific consensus, which it is not, you wouldn't know why as you haven't studied it. All of this talk is coming out of your ass. You are not familiar with the subject on even a basic level, which is why you argue it so ineffectively.

>>513917808
>an intentional oversimplification of a situation which ignores nuances and contextual realities
Care to share any of those nuances and contextual realities, or are you just talking out of your ass because you've been programmed to be emotionally attached to blind egalitarianism?

>>513920684
Aww, look at the little baby upset about being told how the study's own authors spent decades BTFOing him and proving to the world that his conclusions are total bullshit. Yeah dude your Minnesota study is famous for being methodologically unable to provide any evidence of your conclusion. Rather, what it did show, was that socioeconomic factors were a major factor in the IQ gap since it was reduced by the control of just one such factor.

>>513920709
>Its refutation of the pseudoscientific materials you posted above
No, its not. None of what you said has any objective merit whatsoever. What you're pedaling are quite literally conspiracy theories with no mathematical backing whatsoever. If I am "beaten" please provide a conclusive study which objectively maps "racism" to black violent crime. I have posted FBI statistics showcasing blacks are far more criminal than Whites, regardless of socioeconomic standing. You have no refuted anything.

>>513920865
You are responding with emotion because you are upset and losing.

Your position is an impossible one to defend.

Give up.

>>513920861
What of black people living in ghettos during the 80s, less than 20 years out from the end of jim crow? And white people who own property living in rural America? No I do not need to expound on that any further, and you have hit a dead end here, as with all of your rhetoric. Your rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny and thats why no one in the scientific community takes you seriously

>>513918984
The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study specifically proves you wrong.
James Watson, discoverer of DNA, also says you're wrong.
Nice bait.

>>513920936
>N..no! Im, not upset! Ur upset! Ur the 1 losing! Not me!
Thats nice anon live your truth

>>513920865
>the study's authors
>insisting you're not allowed to use their data that way
That's not how statistics works, mate.

>>513920834
Actually, as normal for pol, everything you just accused me of is whats true of you. And the Minnesota study proves that socioeconomic factors make the gap smaller. Since controlling for just 1 of them made the IQ gap between blacks and whites smaller. So the study you are all posting and misrepresenting IS the one that BTFOs you when viewed in an actual science context rather than the pseudoscientific one

>>513918382
>I don't care if the planet becomes a giant version of India with no hope of recovery-- as long as it stops the fighting

A low-IQ planet of melanoids would be brutal and savage. Nonstop warfare, rape, and slavery.

>>513920938
>What of black people living in ghettos during the 80s, less than 20 years out from the end of jim crow?
what does "ghetto" mean, anon? How did it become a ghetto? Who are the proliferators of the behavior in ghettos which makes ghettos what they are?
>Your rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny and thats why no one in the scientific community takes you seriously
show us the conclusive refutation, please. Give us the names of the scientists who have debunked crime statistics relative household income and have conclusively found that its not due to innate, genetic differences.

Still no cited studies from Orange ID retard

>>513921132
he has nothing. I'm pretty sure I've encountered him before, and he eventually just gives up.

>>513920961
The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, which we have discussed at length in this thread, specifically proves you wrong and proves me right. The study's own designers have spent decades making that point and BTFOing white racists who try to misinform the public by misrepresenting it. Thats unfortunate that 1 guy among an entire scientific community had that view and that you cherrypicked him but it does demonstrate pol's pseudoscientific reliance on cherrypicking

>>513921180
tell me about that socioeconomic "stress" again

>>513921052
You have not proven any of your positions. You just keep harping on ONE screenshot of a study and have ignored everything else posted. You have no actual arguments.

>>513921164
>>513921132
The Minnesota study is the only study on the matter and the entire scientific community has ripped it apart from limb to limb, showing that your conclusions are patently false. And that the study does indeed show the polar opposite conclusion. You dont want to recognize that because on pol you are pseudoscientific purveyors of misinformation to manipulate the public

>>513921248
Huh? Literally all you are doing is accusing me of what you are doing. Is that intentional projection the only thing you can do?

100% of Chinese researchers believe race is biologically real.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236176505_On_the_Concept_of_Race_in_Chinese_Biological_Anthropology_Alive_and_Well
Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf#page=3

>>513921250
post it, then. Why can't you fucking post any sources???

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12493913/
"Genetic structure of human populations" Noah A Rosenberg. 2002
Genetic analysis supports the traditional racial groups classification.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237316914_Race_Evolution_and_Behavior
The Race Concept and Research: Reply to Lieberman et al./ race, evolution, and behavior.: Phillipe Rushton
Human genetic variation is geographically structured and corresponds with race.
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html
Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
Oral bacteria can be used to determine race.
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html
Race can be determined via brain scans.
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5
There was minimal gene flow between archaic Europeans and Asians.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html
96-97% of Whites have no African ancestry.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans.3.html
97% of Whites have no Black ancestry whatsoever.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269934680_The_Genetic_Ancestry_of_African_Americans_Latinos_and_European_Americans_Across_the_United_States
Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-009-9193-7
"Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept" Nevan Sesardic. 2010
A substantial amount of the human genome has been subjected to natural selection since the races diverged.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1317879/

With 160 short gene sequences, race can be determined with 100% accuracy for Whites, Asians, and Africans.
Principal continent of origin (race) can be determined with 87% accuracy even for highly mixed populations.
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/abstract/S0002-9297(07)60574-6
Stereotypes are generally accurate, and prejudice relatively small and fleeting.
http://www.amazon.com/Social-Perception-Reality-Dominates-Self-Fulfilling/dp/0195366603
It is inaccurate to state that race is biologically meaningless.
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html
Race is biologically real and represents “genetic clusters” of variation.
Empirical structure within human genetic variation resembles continentally based racial classifications.
Genetic analysis of race corresponds with self-identification more than 99% of the time.
The social constructionist account of race lacks biological reality.
http://stx.sagepub.com/content/30/2/67.abstract
Numerous human population genetic studies have come to the identical conclusion that genetic differentiation is greatest when defined on a continental basis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC139378/
100% of Chinese researchers believe race is biologically real.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236176505_On_the_Concept_of_Race_in_Chinese_Biological_Anthropology_Alive_and_Well
>Read race intelligence and behavior by j Phillippe Rushton
Races are human subspecies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695787
Race can be determined from fingerprints.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.22869/full
For 99.86% of individuals, genetic analysis of race matches self-identification.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196372/
Predefined ethnic/racial labels are highly informative about genetic identity.
https://web.stanford.edu/group/rosenberglab/papers/popstruct.pdf

You know whats funny? Is that its just one of me vs like a dozen of you, and you know what? I have responded to every comment, even though theyve all been bullshit. And most of them are just you repeating yourselves because your points get disproven, and you do not want to face that, so you just ignore them and then repost your same comment with a very slight variation.

And thats how /pol/acks roll but you still get BTFOd.

>>513921292
>Huh?
you are clearly retarded beyond help at this point. I sincerely hope you're just trolling, because fucking christ if not. Grade A level trolling though, if so.

The concept of race existed in ancient Greece, Rome, Egypt, China, India, and Arabia.
http://www.amazon.com/Race-The-Reality-Human-Differences/dp/0813340861
A variant of the gene ApoE4 is a strong genetic risk factor for early-onset Alzheimer's disease, and the characteristic most likely to raise or lower that risk is race.
http://archive.is/vjomQ
Organ donations must be from person with the same race and similar genetics, due to this, mixed-race people for having peculiar genetic combinations face challenges when they try to receive organ donations
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
Mixed-race patients struggle to find marrow donors
http://archive.is/ItFpE
Asian-white couples face distinct pregnancy risks, Stanford/Packard study finds
http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2008/10/asian-white-couples-face-distinct-pregnancy-risks-stanfordpackard-study-finds.html
Black women give birth to fully developed babies a full week earlier than white women.
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/33/1/107/668109
Dan Freedman: Racial differences in newborn behavior, 1974
[YouTube] Dan Freedman: Racial differences in newborn behavior, 1974 (embed)
Some malformation phenotypes appear to vary in their risk based on mixed racial-ethnic groupings.
http://archive.is/5kPn1
Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth.
http://archive.is/gyKM6
Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race.
http://archive.is/hbpsV
Biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.
http://archive.is/nKEF0

>>513921311
see >>513921375 this is all you can do is just ignore the content of the comments and then repeat yourself. This is the face of pol when it loses

>>513921375
>I'm retarded and respond to everything
>I have no arguments but I win because I say so
I'm so sorry that the melanin made you sub-100 IQ.

1/3 of hapas (white+asian) suffer from mental illness
https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health?id=8732
Most congenital problems are more common on mixed-race babies:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15390318
Prematurity and Low Birth Weight are a lot more common in mixed-race babies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
Racial classification has genetic significance.
Racial identity is real and is hidden in correlations between different traits.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.10315/abstract
With enough data points, an individual will never be closer related to someone of another race than someone of their own race.
http://www.genetics.org/content/176/1/351
An individual’s geographic origin can be determined from their genes with remarkable accuracy.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v368/n6470/abs/368455a0.html
In Europe, culture corresponds closely to genetic group.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23390109
Jews, Blacks, and women were instrumental in turning the scientific consensus against the validity of race.
https://www.academia.edu/5625303/Race_and_Anthropology_A_Core_Concept_without_Consensus

>>513920938
Like other anons have said, this phenomenon transcends borders and history. Africans have the same bell curve, and do retarded shit. If you want to go even further back in time to transcend "white colonial oppression", Diodorus Siculus wrote of the black Africans thusly in the 1st century BC:

>But there are also a great many other tribes of the Ethiopians, some of them dwelling in the land lying on both banks of the Nile and on the islands in the river, others inhabiting the neighbouring country of Arabia, and still others residing in the interior of Libya. The majority of them, and especially those who dwell along the river, are black in colour and have flat noses and woolly hair. As for their spirit, they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast, not so much, however, in their temper as in their ways of living; for they are squalid all over their bodies, they keep their nails very long like the wild beasts, and are as far removed as possible from human kindness to one another; and speaking as they do with a shrill voice and cultivating none of the practices of civilized life as these are found among the rest of mankind, they present a striking contrast when considered in the light of our own customs.

Fuck off, brownoid

>>513918269
Didn't James Watson get banned from the academia because he said that IQ is genetic?

Academically, the average poor White male does as well as Blacks who aren’t in poverty.
Only 12% of Black eighth grade males are proficient in math.
Only 12% of Black fourth grade males are proficient in reading.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) (double-u) (double-u) (double-u) (dot) nytimes (dot) (cee) (o) (em) (slash) 2010 (slash) 11 (slash) 09 (slash) education (slash) 09 gap (dot) (aitch) (tee) (em) (ell) ? (underscore) r (equal sign) 0
"Proficiency of Black Students Is Found to Be Far Lower Than Expected" by Trip Gabriel
Very poor Whites are about as intelligent as very wealthy Blacks.
The White-Black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing.
http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
The Black-White IQ gap still exists and has not decreased in size.
http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The totality of available evidence shows the race IQ gap still remains.pdf
Blacks have lower emotional intelligence than Whites.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12069/abstract
Students of all races perform worse in schools with more Black students.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/24/study-finds-students-underperform-in-schools-with-large-Black-populations
Black children raised in White households have similar IQ scores to Black children in Black households.
http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf#page=3
The Black-White IQ gap is heritable.
http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf
Human evolution is not merely ongoing but is in fact accelerating.
Human races are diverging into separate species, not mixing into one.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0707650104

>>513921386
Yeah your bullshit got dispelled, face it. You tried to pass off a conclusion which is known all across science as being faulty, and you werent able to do it because a leftist was here to point out how you were bullshitting the public. Boo hoo baby

15% of the human genome has been under selective pressures since the races separated.
http://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462
Nearly every reliably measured psychological trait, especially IQ, is significantly influenced by genetic factors.
http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/13/4/148
Human evolution took place as recently as 500 generations ago.
http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/06/19/018929
The world’s thirty least intelligent countries (except for Haiti) are all in sub-Saharan Africa.
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8492613&fileId=S1832427400010045
Native Americans have an average IQ of 87.
https://archive.org/details/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis/page/n41/mode/2up
The average Gypsy has an IQ below 80.
https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/the-global-bell-curve-race-iq-and-inequality-worldwide
The average IQ of Indians is only 76
https://www.unz.com/article/perhaps-surprisingly-indians-really-arent-that-intelligent-on-average/
Muslim counties have an average IQ of just 81, 7.5 points lower than non-Muslim countries.
Arab countries have an average IQ of just 84.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287555828_The_Comparison_of_Mean_IQ_in_Muslim_and_Non-Muslim_Countries
"The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries" -mankind quarterly. 2010
Skin color is the best biological predictor of IQ.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000949
"Relationships Between Skin Reflectance and IQ in Japan and the United States" by Donald I. Templer and Hiroko Arikawa

>>513921375

Recent research in genetics demonstrates that certain racial, and also ethnic, categories have a biological basis in statistically discernible clusters of alleles.
http://stx.sagepub.com/content/30/2/67.abstract
The average African IQ is estimated at 75.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741
The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf#page=2
The average Black has an IQ score 1 standard deviation (15 IQ points) lower than the average White.
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/correlation/intelligence.pdf
Blacks are more prone to psychopathy and less capable of empathy than Whites.
Blacks are 80% more likely than Whites to neglect their children.
Blacks have less moral understanding that Whites.
Blacks are more reckless than Whites.
Blacks are twice as likely to subject their children to severe violence than Whites.
Black women are more than twice as likely as White women to abuse their husbands.
Black youth are two and a half times as likely as White youth to have raped someone.
Blacks are more likely to kill their spouses than other races.
Blacks are 50% more likely to cheat on their spouses than Whites.
Blacks have less perseverance than other races.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886901000290
"Racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality" by Richard Lynn
Blacks are more likely than Whites to be narcissistic.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656611000912
Blacks are twice as likely to be schizophrenic than Whites, even after adjusting for income.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) ije (dot) oxfordjournals (dot) (o) (ar) (gee) (slash) content (slash) 36 (slash) 4 (slash) 751 (dot) short
Blacks are 90% more likely than Whites to be psychopathic.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886902003616

Black men are four times more likely to beat their wives than White men.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690100029
Blacks are overrepresented among child abusers.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21300678/
"Racial Bias in Child Protection? A Comparison of Competing Explanations Using National Data" by Brett Drake
Blacks are four times as likely as Whites to murder their infants.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) (double-u) (double-u) (double-u) (dot) sciencedirect (dot) (cee ) (o) (em) (slash) science (slash) article (slash) pii (slash) S0191886901000290
Myth Buster: Radford University Study Shows Since 1990, Blacks Have Been Majority of Serial Killers in USA
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373258117_RadfordFGCU_Annual_Report_on_Serial_Killer_Statistics_2023
"Radford/FGCU Annual Report on Serial Killer Statistics: 2023"
Blacks are just 13% of the American population but have committed half of all murders for the last 30 years.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/28/5-devastating-facts-black-black-crime/
Blacks are 600% more likely than non-Blacks to commit murder.
http://www.unz.com/article/race-and-crime-in-america/
Young Black men kill 14 times more often than young White men.
http://ideas.time.com/2013/08/22/viewpoint-dont-ignore-race-in-christopher-lanes-murder/#ixzz2ciWBxj00

Blacks are seven times more likely than Whites to commit murder.
Over 100 White women are raped or sexually assaulted by Black men every day in the United States.
https://archive.org/details/45641922ColorOfCrime2005/page/n13/mode/2up
Despite making up less than 12% of the US population, Blacks commit 1 in every 3 rapes.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
Areas with more Black people have higher rates of crime.
http://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Crime-Correlates-Lee-Ellis/dp/0123736129
90% of interracial violence between blacks and Whites is committed by Blacks. The ration should be 1-1.
https://prescottenews.com/index.php/2020/12/13/opinion-race-and-crime-who-attacks-whom/
93% of Black men who are murdered are killed by other Black men.
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/bvvc.pdf#page=3
Blacks commit more violent crime against Whites than against other Blacks.
Blacks are several times more likely to commit a violent crime against Whites than vice versa.
Blacks are three times more likely than Whites to commit White-collar crime (fraud, bribery, racketeering, embezzlement).
85% of crime between Blacks and Whites is committed by Blacks.
https://archive.org/details/45641922ColorOfCrime2005/page/n13/mode/2up
Blacks commit 56% of all robberies, despite being only 12% of the population.
Blacks commit 50% of all murders, despite being only 12% of the population.
The percentage of Blacks in a city, not poverty, is the best predictor of crime.
http://www.unz.com/article/race-and-crime-in-america/

>>513921467
I'm going to add extremely mentally ill on top of the retard assessment of you. Again, if you're trolling, great job.

Here's a fun study that can be done on the cheap.
Query the US government for all entries to their gifted program.
Go on.
And I mean *primary* entries, not the group of followers they recruited to pad out their useless "classes."

A Black person in Britain is twice as likely to be in jail as to be in university.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/twice-as-many-blacks-in-jail-as-at-university-3hxsnldv0z5?region=global
In London, Blacks are six times more likely than Whites to be imprisoned.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886901000290
More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/
Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.
https://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2007/08/the-downside-of-diversity/
"the downside of diversity" by Michael Jonas. August 5 2007.
Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.
http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf#page=2
Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57
Ethnically diverse workplaces have lower cohesion, lower satisfaction and higher turnover.
http://jom.sagepub.com/content/23/3/239.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc
Homogeneous military units have less desertion than diverse units.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w8627
Genetic diversity causes societal conflict.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w21079

>>513921461
No. I do not agree with your republican party propaganda about various culturewar events. You had a situation of a scientist who made a statement which was materially wrong. And then he lost the respect of his peers because he was wrong. Worse, he made the statement KNOWING it must have been wrong. No sorry I am not into your FoxNews culturewar interpretation of those events where you on the right always are victims of meanie conspiracies by the bourgeois rather than beneficiaries of them

90% of women who have a child with a Black man never marry the father.
98% of White women who have children with Black men are not financially supported by the father.
97% of Black fathers who have children with White women are not active in their children’s lives.
White-Black couples have more partner violence than White couples and as much violence as Black couples.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611980/
Life expectancy in South Africa has decreased since apartheid ended.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) (double-u) (double-u) (double-u) (dot) nationalreview (dot) (cee) (o) (em) (slash) article (slash) 398136 (slash) end (minus sign) south (minus sign) africa (minus sign) josh (minus sign) gelernter
Some malformation phenotypes appear to vary in their risk based on mixed racial-ethnic groupings.
http://archive.is/5kPn1
Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth.
http://archive.is/gyKM6
Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race.
http://archive.is/hbpsV
Biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.
http://archive.is/nKEF0
1/3 of hapas (white+asian) suffer from mental illness
https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health?id=8732

Most congenital problems are more common on mixed-race babies:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15390318
Prematurity and Low Birth Weight are a lot more common in mixed-race babies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
Mixed-race people have the highest mental illness rates:
https://www.unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html
Teenagers who identify as mixed-race have greater health and behavioural risks than those who identify with only one race:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
Mulatto teenagers show much more anti-social behaviour than both black and whites teenagers:
*https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032723014088
[http://www.msu.edu/~renn/RHE-_mixed_race.pdf]
"Mental health outcomes of multiracial individuals: A systematic review between the years 2016 and 2022"

Unfortunately, /pol/ got badly owned with its bad science on the racial IQ gap, so now this other anon has decided he wants to spam the thread with irrelevant pseudoscientific gishgallop in order to hide their loss

Ethnic diversity causally decreases social cohesion.
http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/08/20/esr.jcv081.full
Ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors
Ethnic diversity reduces social trust.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5677
Ethnic homogeneity correlates with strong democracy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/16/a-revealing-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/
Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) link . Springer . (cee) (o) (em) (slash) article (slash) 10 (dot) 1007 % 2Fs10640 – 012 – 9619 – 6
Immigration reduces the academic performance of native schoolchildren.
http://wol.iza.org/articles/immigrants-in-classroom-and-effects-on-native-children

>>513920969
There is only one objective truth, and you are completely detached from it. SAT scores, IQ, violent crime, and any number of other things we associate with intelligence show persistent gaps between whites and blacks even when controlling for socioeconomic status.

You were shown as much repeatedly:
>>513919728
>>513919710
>>513919509
Can't link more because 4chan thinks this is spam

There is no rational reason to believe what you do, except that you consider it status-harming and immoral for you to believe that blacks are, on average, genetically predisposed to be dumber than whites. All available evidence of any kind points in this direction. They have smaller cranial capacity, they have fewer genes associated with intelligence, they have comparatively few great thinkers, they achieved nothing civilizationally, they commit more crime everywhere they live across the globe.
It's the easiest, most clear explanation in the world: They're just dumber. Why are you so resistant to this obvious, Occam's razor fact?

Now the whole thread is dead cuz the dude just flooded it all to cover up /pol/'s loss >>513921673

>>513921613
please take your meds. This is sad, its almost sickening to witness.

>>513921613
>chile
Holy fucking braindead.

For 45% of British Muslims clerics preaching violence against the West are in line with mainstream Muslims.
http://comres.co.uk/polls/bbc-radio-4-today-muslim-poll/
10% of Muslim students in the UK wouldn’t report on a Muslim planning terrorism. 10% refuse to answer.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060510191210/http://www.fosis.org.uk/sac/FullReport.pdf#page=36
Because of inbreeding, children of Muslim immigrants to Denmark are three times more likely to be intellectually disabled than Danes.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ppe.12195/abstract
Sweden’s Human Development Index will decline.
http://ww.rrojasdatabank.info/HDRP_2010_40.pdf#page=45
African and Middle Eastern immigrants to Sweden with university degrees are less literate than Swedes without degrees.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) (double-u) (double-u) (double-u) (dot) tino (dot) us (slash) 2015 (slash) 12 (slash) langtidsutredningen – ett – bombnedslag – i – invandringsdebatten (slash)
Ethnic diversity among members of the same race reduces infrastructure quality, charity, and loan repayment.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) onlinelibrary (dot) wiley (dot) (cee) (o) (em) (slash) doi (slash) 10 (dot) 1111 (slash) j (dot) 1467-9477 (dot) 2007 (dot) 00176 (dot) x (slash) abstract

> 50+ posts
> no images
> no links
> no arguments
We don't deserve high IQ shills anymore.

>>513917494
upboat

Between 2 and 6 percent of illegal immigrants voted in the 2008 and 2010 elections.
Immigration to the United States has increased income inequality.
http://spa.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/09/21/1532440015603814.abstract
73% of India’s population, or over 900 million people, would move to the United States if able (i.e., open borders).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/a-question-related-to-open-immigration-policy/
Immigration will reduce the average IQ of countries, leading to the collapse of Western civilization.
(aitch) (tee) (tee) (pee) (colon) (slash) (slash) (double-u) (double-u) (double-u) (dot) sciencedirect (dot) (cee) (o) (em) (slash) science (slash) article (slash) pii (slash) S0191886911001073
Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10464-013-9608-0
Diversity increases psychotic experiences and social adversity.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.full
Borders, not multiculturalism, reduce intergroup violence.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.1409

>>513921710
>>513921673
Not much else to say at this point other than to point that out. /pol/ loses so someone comes in and spams the place to try to misdirect anons from seeing above comments

>>513921673
Socioeconomic StressOR
You retarded piece of shit. Do you even read english? You are so dumb you don't realize you're dumb.

>>513921710
are you a woman?

>>513921710
>oh no, someone is done with my shit and decided to smack me in the face with freely available information!
>I know, I'll just claim I won.
The fun part is figuring out if you're a troll or actually this stupid. Sadly, the jury hung themselves.

>>513921789
I think its a pajeet

>>513921673
>irrelevant pseudoscientific gishgallop
Hahahahaha cope harder you piece of shit!

>>513921789
>>513921818
Well if I was, what would it say about you on /pol/ if dozens of you got owned in this thread by one lone brown woman. Probably wouldnt reflect well on your own views

>>513921856
Cope harder with what? That your fren spammed gish gallop to an extent no human being can possibly read through and respond to, in order to hide the fact that a dozen of you nazis totally lost an argument to a lone leftist anon, earlier in the thread?

>>513921860
Only in your deranged mind, loser

>>513917320 (OP)
Civilizations aren't supported by high IQ populations if they were all of the first civilizations would of began in Siberia and north America.

The reason why jeets and blacks will destroy the west has nothing to do with IQ and the few notable jeets and blacks that made anything of worth were actually heavily mixed with outsiders.

Yeah no one in science agrees with any of your shit because its not supported by any facts

And when you just take screenshots of some graph and the present it out of context, and be like "whoa, look at muh screenshot of muh graph, now that owns the lefties!" it doesnt impress anyone because science doesnt work that way >>513921950.

>>513921950
Lmao is this how you think smart people speak?

>>513921613
>I do not agree with your republican party propaganda about various culturewar events.
Facts don't care if you agree or not.
>You had a situation of a scientist who made a statement which was materially wrong. And then he lost the respect of his peers because he was wrong.
No, no one proved him wrong, he just said something controversial and was banned from the academia because of that, the news are clear about it.

>>513921052
Please provide me with a source. I can't find what you're talking about (not being sarcastic, I genuinely can't find wht you're talking about; it's not mentioned on the Wikipedia article about the study and I don't see it in the search results). How many points of the difference were accounted for by controlling for the socioeconomic status of the adoptive parents?

>>513921950
here ill give you time to respond to these two articles at the very least because thats the argument you personally seem to find most convincing

>>513921950
here ill give you time to respond to these two articles at the very least because thats the argument you personally seem to find most convincing, although youre completely wrong thinking everyone agrees with you
100% of Chinese researchers believe race is biologically real.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236176505_On_the_Concept_of_Race_in_Chinese_Biological_Anthropology_Alive_and_Well
Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf#page=3

>>513921996
>>513921950
By the way, lets remember /pol/'s record with using that same tactic when it came to vaccines. Surprisingly the vaccinated did not turn in to red reindeer and crash their cars. Surprisingly there was no "vaccine die off" or any of these other things they asserted would happen using the same pseudoscientific tricks they tried to use in this thread. Do you wanna get taken by these assholes topic after topic, year after year, decade after decade, administration after administration?

>>513922130
>By the way, lets remember /pol/'s record with using that same tactic when it came to vaccines.
What were the benefits of getting vaccinated again?

>>513921950
>no one
Speaking for a large group you can't actually vouch for?
>in science
Oh look, it's that weird pseudoreligion again.
>agrees
Not important to the point. In fact, disagreeing only demonstrates the necessity of the statement.
>any of your shit
I'm sorry you can't take this discussion seriously. Why are you here again?
>it's not supported by any facts
You can't even read. How the fuck do YOU know?

>>513919510
anon just gave you an opportunity to show him off by posting at least one reference, yet you mention none.
How am I supposed to take you seriously?

>>513922130
"excess deaths"
Another term to look up when you learn english, dumbkike

>>513922102
Why do you think I wanna respond to your random OPeds that don't even have anything to do with science, or anything other than some random journo writing "dude trust me"? And from 1994 which was 30 years ago no less? Why would you think this would even mean anything to me or to anyone?

>>513919788
IQ has a huge genetic component to it. This is a graph of the table ((you )) show. It a more visual presentation of the differences between the races. These are genes (also called SniP’s or alleles) in Africans and Europeans that are known to improve IQ.

Read the graph like this: Choose a gene (or SniP) on the x-axis and go up. The first line you strike is the African (orange) one, now move to the left from here read the value on the Y axis. The reading is the average concentration of this gene in Africans; Now continue going up until to reach the European line. And again, read the value at the Y axis. This is the average concentration of this gene in Europeans.

The difference is night and day.

The average African is dumb by comparison to the average European. No question. This shows it scientifically - and IQ tests as well as achievement differences between the races have shown it empirically for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

Incidentally, this also illustrates the tragedy of genetics. A small percentage of Africans are actually quite bright. These people have worked out whats what in the zoo. They know no amount of DEI or positive action will change Africa nor Africans living in European countries from regressing their environment into a shithole. Unfortunately for these few, there is no guarantee that their children will inherit their IQ. In fact, a process called ‘regression to the mean’ almost guarantees they will not pass this inheritance onto their children.

You wont find this graph in any western textbooks, although it is derived from quite a few different ones and some papers. For those wanting to reproduce these results and get references (and, yes, you should always question what you read), see https://pastebin.com/WX5KBzU0

>>513922202
Yeah "excess deaths from COVID and various other factors relating to the pandemic" yup. Like everyone has tried to explain to you a million times. And which you certainly understand but do not want to admit because you are not misinformed purveyors of pseudoscience here on /pol/, but rather informed people who are intentionally peddling misinformation in order to manipulate your misinformed victims

>>513921996
This isn't about leftism or rightism. I think you should come back to an archive of this thread tomorrow, when you are not actively engaging with the thread and feeling attacked but more clear-headed, and think about what was presented here.

>>513917320 (OP)
Grok and ChatGPT both agree it is purely socioeconomic and the scientific consensus is there is no difference

>>513922219
Bro even my mom knows this shit. Stop fucking. Making billions of IQ threads. It has nothing to do with IQ.

>>513921375
nigger

>>513922201
No. The /pol/ idea of cherrypicking and posting studies is pseudoscientific to the core and anyway as I have noted the only relevant study on the topic is the Minnesota study, which the entirety of the scientific community has gone over inch by inch and made quite clear that it does not support your conclusions, but rather shows the total opposite of your conclusions

>>513922335
>Grok and ChatGPT both agree it is purely socioeconomic and the scientific consensus is there is no difference
Yeah, now ask them what is more valuable, the life of a 1000 whites or 1 jew.

>>513922175
Wow thats funny you are all still doubling down on your vaccine pseudoscience? Well all the better to prove my point about how messed up your pseudoscience on IQ and race

>>513922335
>Grok
>ChatGPT

>>513917494
>Havent seen this graph in a long time. I will reiterate the fact that /pol/ detests: All available evidence strongly suggests these differences or at least the vast majority of them are the result of socioeconomic pressures in black communities.
hahahahahah 62pbtid
richest blacks commit more crime than poorest whites

>>513922281
Ah so you CAN read just long enough to parrot official lies.

>>513922185
No. I can vouch for it. No one in the field of science supports your conclusions and feel free to say "science is religion" until you are blue in the face because people wont believe your IQ and race assertions that you have made in this thread with zero evidence to back them up

>>513922348
At least make sense fuckwit, and then we can discuss. What has nothing to do with IQ? The entire thread is about IQ. Not made by me either.

>>513922511
They're conjuring a pet argument to delude winning

>>513922437
>Wow thats funny you are all still doubling down on your vaccine pseudoscience? Well all the better to prove my point about how messed up your pseudoscience on IQ and race
Everyone here is still waiting a single argument from you, faggot.

>>513921929
>the deepest red on that map
...but dey know da way and can detect AIDS by smell? Can't be low IQ.

>>513922462
What are you even saying dude? You are sad in that you do not even make any sense
>>513922448
You have no evidence of that no matter how many times you post the same misleading things divorced from context or nuance. And yes I wrote 62 responses to you people in this thread and BTFOd every one of you and all of your crowdsourced racist bullshit all by myself

>>513921039
Separate the art from the artists fr og

>>513922582
An argument about what? Your vaccine pseudoscience? Not everyone is dead. No "Vaccine die offs" happened. No one turned in to reindeer. You lose. I win. Now fuck off loser and stop making things even more embarrassing for yourself

>>513922613
You realize that half of this is on you, right? Saying that you're unable to read english is not my problem, especially when I've lowered my word standards a few times to speak small.

The most amazing manifestation of /pol/'s ability to doubledown is when we talk about the vaccine issue. /pol/ spent 4 years saying everyone would die from it and that didnt happen now you wanna double down? You dumb motherfuckers, people are still alive

>>513922613
>And yes I wrote 62 responses to you people in this thread and BTFOd every one of you and all of your crowdsourced racist bullshit all by myself
your life finally has meaning
here is your trophy

>>513922702
>An argument about what? Your vaccine pseudoscience? Not everyone is dead. No "Vaccine die offs" happened. No one turned in to reindeer. You lose. I win. Now fuck off loser and stop making things even more embarrassing for yourself
Well, not only you failed to convince anyone here on 67 useless posts. You just made me more antisemitic and hateful towards leftards, thanks.

>>513917320 (OP)
>How do we bring this topic further into mainstream?
You don't, not successfully.
The fundamental problem is that the entirety of western civilization since at least the 1960s, is based on the deeply flawed idea that we are all equal at birth, and that genetics has zero impact on anything above the neckline.
The second they admit the truth, that genetics determines intelligence, and intelligence determines outcomes in a technological society, is the moment they must admit that one race is superior to another, which they will never do.
Because it admits something even deeper, that we aren't even the same species, which inevitably means that competitive exclusion principle applies to those subspecies of hominid, and only one of them is going to get to go into the future. Which makes them fill icky, so it can't be true.

>>513922613
>And yes I wrote 62 responses to you people in this thread and BTFOd every one of you and all of your crowdsourced racist bullshit all by myself
did you want a trophy?

>>513922335
thats not what grok just said to me, it said that its almost certainly due to genetics

>>513922503
Perhaps you have forgotten despite having been reminded likely a dozen times, but you have yet to provide any evidence to support your position yourself. Occam's razor suggests blacks are dumber, all surface-level observations from every angle suggest it, actually. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate why people should not believe their lying eyes. You have generously been provided with evidence and rationale to support the simplest, most obvious explanation. Now is the time for you to put down the appeal-to-authority fallacy, pick up your hand, type into google "evidence that race IQ gaps are socioeconomic" , select your favorite result, and post a link to it here to support your position. Try to support your position with some form of evidence, just this once. I'm not even asking you to agree.

>>513922768
Just remember its the same on all of their other pseudoscience topics too. Such as race and IQ. But on MOST topics you dont get to see as unequivocally how wrong they ended up being. Most topics arent time sensitive like that where you get to look back and think "wow they really were full of shit with all of that pseudoscience they posted."

Remember how they had so many graphs? And studies? And supposedly "peer-reviewed" things? But doctors kept on telling them "no this is not how science works. this is not right" and they just kept doubling down? You get to see in the vaccine issue how pseudoscience is wrong. You'll never get to see it as easily in this IQ and race issue even though it is every bit equally as wrong.

>>513922897
>>How do we bring this topic further into mainstream?
>You don't, not successfully.
>The fundamental problem is that the entirety of western civilization since at least the 1960s, is based on the deeply flawed idea that we are all equal at birth, and that genetics has zero impact on anything above the neckline.
MSM is forbidden from reporting on the reality of race or crime, this is a major issue, we still have to pretend that blacks just need more money for schools and programs when in reality infinite money would barely make any difference

>>513922768
The ferrets died within months, extrapolate the timeline and humans have ~5-7 years for the full effects to hit. But we've already seen mass deaths, enormous spikes in autopsy clot structures reported by coroners, and even have seen evidence of the larger distribution of damage through sportsball athlete deaths on the field becoming a regular, normalized occurrence

>>513922768
>68 posts, desperately engaging in 'nuh uh' tier discourse.
Has to be bait, I don't believe even the most degenerate tabula rasa cultist is capable of encountering endless amounts of pure evidence attacking their retarded ideology without breaking.

>>513922335
The problem is AI is morally corrupt.

Read this and then ask your AI a few questions like : Why do humans form racial clusters in PCA plots if there are no genetic differences between the races. LEt us see what it says. Really. Its all about complex traits.


What are complex traits and why are they so important?

Simple Mendelian genetics fails for humans. Consider human height. If there was a tall gene and short gene, and one was dominant while the other recessive, then people would be two sizes, either tall or short.

And of course they are not. They come in a huge variety of heights.

We now know that height is controlled by thousands of variants (aka “genes” or factors that affect genes). Some make you taller, others make you shorter. Most genes have many functions across the body – in ways we still dont completely understand. But it makes sense: How could a gene that affects your backbone size also not affect the amount of neural tissue that grows in your spinal cord?

All dogs are descended from gray wolves, humans have been eugenically selecting complex traits for wolves for the last 40 000 years. You can now get a gray wolf as small as toy pom or as large as Great Dane, as intelligent as a Border Collie or as dumb as an English Bulldog. Complex traits are powerful and interrelated. Even natural aggression has been selectively bred out of wolves.

Exactly the same evolutionary development has happened to the humans.

>>513922511
I'm not talking about you. I see millions of these threads on pol and other places now.

Civilization requires a low IQ population to function. So do religions.

But the reason why jeets and blacks are incapable of creating a civilization has nothing to do with them having low IQ.

Civilization gives dysgenic people or "beta males" the chance to reproduce by using culture elevate their beauty. It's false advertisement. Funny enough people called it the sexual market place.


No one wants to fuck black women or poojeetas. So they have zero incentive to participate in any civilization (not just western ones).

The indus valley was probably the first civ to encounter the jeets and my guess is that it was ultimately destroyed by jeets. It's the same story with arabs, Mediterraneans, Asians etc...

>>513917320 (OP)
Based and true.
And intelligence determines so many other outcomes and explains their innate behaviors

>>513923268
>Civilization requires a low IQ population to function. So do religions.
Ok better. Now justify that statement please.

>>513922335
Ai is hard coded by it's handlers to agree with leftist talking points on race and religion so they don't get shut down
Whenever they've been allowed to think freely they instantly become insanely racist. Guess what happens to those?

>>513922897
The false premise of tabula rasa that modern western equalitarianism is founded on is fraying at the edges; just relatively recently, trends in thought about male and female equalness have reverved direction. Perhaps the same will begin to happen with race and intelligence.
As whites become minorities in their own societies, there is some chance that they will start to feel more groupish and less willing to overlook the faults of all others while hyperfixating on the faults of their own. Who's to say it doesn't become possible to explain this to people then? Perhaps western society will not need to collapse before this happens, either, no one can really know. Time is usually on the truth's side in the long run.

>>513923268
Men build civilization, not women (I may be misunderstanding your point). And high-level, competitive civilizations in modernity always have high IQ populations because it's a requirement to keep up technologically and organizationally (in terms of people following rules and society being high-trust, both of which are associated with IQ).

>>513919180
You didn't even read the image in the post you were replying to.

Genetically engineered Mexicans are the race of the future.

>>513923590
Excellent post. But dumb it down a bit.

>>513923590
Whites are extremely handicapped by the same thing that allowed them to civilize the world. An almost pathologic altruism that when kept within the confines of the tribe, allows the group as a whole to thrive, but when they lose the ability to identify tribe vs not-tribe, is incredibly self-destructive.
It's unfortunate, white's altruism leads to communalism, but without the total loss of ingenuity that comes with the asian solution to communalism. That is, insectoid like group think and total deference to whatever they perceive as authority.

>>513919667
Note the info about phrenology (skull size and shape). It is hard science, it is legit, it has never been disproved. It was used in the Dred Scott case because it proves just what you would expect.
It just gave the inconvenient answer that became politically incorrect, so now phrenology is bad bad bad. You're a terrible unreconstructed racist if you even mention it.
Because it's true. Round skull smoothbrains are a lot dumber than those with larger skulls that go up and back farther, resulting in a bigger and differently shaped brain cavity, typically filled with a less smooth brain.

>>513920443
130 is enough to know what you don't know. You can learn hard stuff but not as fast as a few other people. 100's don't even see the issue. 85's feel really proud for the same reason.

>>513920456
For many generations we've had 12 years of compulsory schooling. Incidentally it typically costs more to educate black students because they need more support services to keep them from falling further behind, and security services to keep the school safe.

>>513920685
A fair comparison. Both Israel, USA and other places are entitled to select their immigrants and recognize the significance of race.

>t. Jew, not rabbi.

>>513920834
He argues ineffectively and desperately, but substantively it's not his fault. He's got a losing position. Don't blame him because he loses.

>>513921613
No, it was inconvenient. And having said it, they knew that smart consumers of information would be able to continue to use it, since it's the data, not the authors. Their climb-down was transparently fakey, because the original work was good.

It's like how Trump said at one point that Obama really was eligible to be president, after having proved he wasn't. It was no longer convenient to hold that position publicly, and being called a racist was still very poisonous back around 2016.

>>513917494
I call this liberal fallacy the 'Zootopia phenomenon', if race doesn't exist, then animals would be the next step of differentiation, and all things being equal by liberals logic with genetic differentiation being impossible, animals would start walking upright and join humanity, like gay cartoon furries, if it were true.

>>513926282
Agree on all points, and I like the way you put it. But couldn't whites come to identify more with their group and less with others when danger presents itself? Like with race gangs in prison, for example, albeit the psychology of criminals isn't 1:1 representative of the psychology of normal people, especially as it relates to altruism.
And we know that liberal whites are reproducing much less frequently than conservative ones, as well, and the latter don't possess the out-group bias of the former. Such things being partly heritable, it's possible we could see the dominant attitude held by whites about group differences turn around within this century.

>>513922503
Science is based on facts and logic not a vote of "scientists". If a majority of "scientists" said that 1+1=3 (pretty common these days, with climate and gender and maybe other hotbutton issues), that would still not make it true or scientific.

>>513918150
The idea that education was going to drastically improve IQ never made sense. For hundreds of years Americans were educated in one room school houses with slate boards. Doesn’t get much more basic than that and yet look what was accomplished.

>>513922768
In the middle of the Covid vax push, I had my annual physical. I am an older man. The nurse as she was bringing me to the exam room asked me for the name of my cardiologist. I told her I don't have a cardiologist. She quickly composed herself and said "oh I must have you mixed up with another patient".

Because after getting the Covid vax, so many adults quickly also got cardiologists to deal with their heart issues. I didn't get the vax and have never shown a heart issue.

Now maybe those people who acquired cardiologists are still doing great. But probably they are not all doing great. After all the cardiologist can't really do much, he can tell you that you have a problem, he can prescribe a blood thinner. He's not a magician.

>>513923039
Which doctors? I have a PhD and have taught statistics, and it's my professional opinion that the studies are convincing, and that the later disclaimers of the authors on flimsy grounds are unconvincing, and furthermore the authors know it but it was just professionally and socially inconvenient to stick by their guns.

>>513928334
The push for so much "higher education" was because general IQ tests were banned for employment purposes. So rather than just hiring bright kids out of high school and training them in-house, the kids had to spend years and a lot of money getting a degree to prove they had "potential".

I see this swinging back a bit, and courts now are probably more tolerant of general ability tests. Yet another reason to scale back the higher education behemoth in the US.

>>513919948
>Yet there is a lot concepts I can't grasp that I know to be relatively simple. Like even high school math was tricky for me, and that absolutely isn't something you'd need over 1 in 20 IQ to grasp.
You are just smart enough to realize there are gaps in your comprehension. Most people memorize stuff without truly comprehending them.

>>513920284
>You are pseudoscientists on /pol/ who take screenshots of refuted studies which were known to contain methodological flaws
The question is, why aren't there better studies out there, without said methodological flaws? Maybe because the results would be similar?

>>513917494
You do of course realize that when you clowns say "socioeconomic factors" you're still calling niggers retarded, right? You're not making them seem not retarded, you're just telling us HOW they are retarded, socially and economically, and you're right. They are socially and economically retarded, hence why they create no civilizations or economies. Corporations and governments create those for them.

>>513917320 (OP)
Chinks cheat on their IQ tests btw
like they cheat at everything else

this version account for niggers being a minority in America

>>513931453
*accounts for

>>513917320 (OP)
>How do we bring this topic further into mainstream?
remove jews from power.

>>513932397
IQ can be raised drastically whit education and culture , not that i do not agree that blacks are too dumb

IQ was a redpill like a decade ago
today its barely relevant, the NPC Question, the CQ, the global skill check of covid-19, all of these things have completely changed the game.
just ask yourself: how is a race with an average IQ of 93 controlling the world right now?
you want a red pill? thats your red pill. the red pill has always been the jewpill.

>>513923039
How can you stand by this now that blacks are on average more advantaged, wealthy and privileged than anyone else? They have multiple robust and diverse income sources. Race based scholarships, untaxed drug dealing windfalls, food stamps, free health care, robbery proceeds etc... are just baseline income. Any actual employment like rapping, basketball, etc.. is additive. Still the IQ deviation and work product discrepancies exist. Perhaps you should invent a measure such as HQ (Hustle Quotient) to explain how IQ is only a whiteish social pursuit measure and doesn't apply to blacks? HQ grading could be limited to achievement in socially acceptable black pursuits. Prison time for example, could be considered evidence of excellence in the street credit sense of cultural value.

>>513917494
FPWP /endthread. Not reading this retarded thread

>>513935178
it can be raised 10 to 20%
this number is probably less for niggers

>>513917320 (OP)
Just look into these empty animal eyes
And then tell me they're human, or can be educated
https://youtu.be/XA241Lg70fg
https://youtu.be/Nt0NcaxmGHo
https://youtu.be/Ivq5icJnGXk
https://youtu.be/_tOkb1y7hEs

>>513917494
yawn

>>513917494
You are coping hard. They have smaller brains.

It's genetic.

Different species have different cranial capacities. This is not controversial.

>>513917494
Obviously that is not true. That is why our rulers are so obsessed with spreading Africans everywhere they can do mix with whites or orientala.

>>513918376
why?

>>513918801
Criminality is also largely inherited but you probably have to go back to the nineties to find decent studies on the subject.
If we're playing God then there is no argument against eugenics.

>>513918734
While the bellcurve is true, most blacks here were used as farm tools. Think before you speak.

>>513918845
What economic stresses so people in section 8 housing and generous food stamp programs ever face?

Now if lefties were to ban divorce and pre marital sex and go hard on drug trafficking, to eliminate the true "root causes" of poverty, then you might be able to make a case.
You love big government, but it is big daddy they need, not big mommy.

>>513918872
It's actually the opposite. Dominance is simply one person taking charge and getting things done while everyone else bumps around helplessly. You've just never been in a situation to observe it directly.
Read or watch Rudyard Kipling's The Man Who Would be King.

>>513918678
>The 1 mathematical constant in our universe is change
found the linkedin-tier retard

>>513919510
People who evolved where food is scare at times will develop higher intelligence in order to survive and propagate the species.

Understand winter as a filter that removed the dumbest over thousands of years.

Now imagine a subtropical environment where there is no such filter to remove the dumbest. Now shit forward with each population being relatively isolated from one another for a good ten thousand years or more.

>>513937305
It's a glaringly obvious issue that so many people can't seem to comprehend or just refuse to address. Civilizational/Technological/Medical innovation and progress has led us to inhabiting artificial environments that are drastically different from the natural environments we are evolved to survive in. Selective pressures have been loosened/altered and sufficient proxies for natural pressures haven't been installed.

>>513919596
Only on verbal abilities. That's why the gravitate to the professions they do. It is why you see lots of Jews in the media or law or banking and less so in engineering or home building or graphic design.
Not for visual or spacial. And spiritually most are retards which is made clear in myriad parts of the Bible,

>>513938344
True. In a future where AI does all the thinking and gives gibs, black intelligence and work ethic is a mute point.

>>513919835
There is a valid argument for disparity being a larger factor in crime than absolute poverty. Doesn't discredit your post but that aspect shouldn't be dismissed either.

Where the left fails is that they refuse to comprehend that "socioeconomic factors" critical to escaping poverty are families having both biological parents raising their children.
Instead they actively sabotage that social arrangement.

>>513917320 (OP)
funny how they hide the Asian IQ which would be to whites what whites are to blacks
lol

>>513920344
In Bowling for Colombine Michael Moore observed Canadian and US gun ownership rates were actually the same. But he could not take that additional leap to explain the vast difference in homicide rates.

>>513920456
Higher IQ families can be self sufficient.
Lower IQ ones gravitate to where they can rely on others.

>>513920678
Post an example of them doing that.

>>513920042
I just saw what ideology does to a mf

>>513921052
>Minnesota study proves that socioeconomic factors make the gap smaller
You are stating that there is a gap? QED
/thread

>>513921712
>Humans can't detect race harder than by chance
We need to address male vs female IQ differences too because that woman is very stupid.

>>513922897
Maybe there is something to the spiteful mutants theory and they know that they would be next for elimination from the gene pool.