>>513940251
If you're going to claim that currently analyses are incorrect, you need a greater level of precision than the current understanding. That is the basis of scientific reason - continuous refinement towards the truth. The majority of your points are primarily conjecture at best, or "look at the similarity between two disconnected systems, isn't that mysterious!" at worst.
Further to that point, the only concrete mathematical argument you make is the correlation of distance/diameter of the sun and moon. "about 400 times further away" is incorrect. It's 389x on average, which is a difference of many hundreds of miles, and is constantly shifting both due to the relevant orbits and gravity tugging everything about. The reason why they appear similarly sized in our sky is exactly because of that ratio, and due to the orbit of our moon it can vary by as much as 26,000 miles, which is why we get "super moons" and shit like that.
On the subject of orbits (and eclipses), they are not as perfect as you think. That's part of why the same eclipses vary depending on region, hemisphere, and elevation, and why different places may have eclipses the rest of the world never has. pic related
Esotericism is great, if you do it correctly. The world is plenty mysterious and schizo-baiting if you stick to reality. Have a bump tho