Thread 513942405

I see the political implications of the war on masculinity talked about a lot on here (as it should be because it's fucked up), but I hardly ever hear much about the war on femininity.
From millenials downwards in age, we have entire generations of women who think doing or being anything feminine is degrading. They make it a virtue never to smile in public; they base their identities around how many masculine habits they have instead of feminine.
What the fuck is to be done about this? Society without the feminine is boring and drab and sad; I'd say even women are starting to notice some of it at this point. I understand the reasoning behind the war 9n masculinity, of course: they want a bunch of bitchmade dorks who will never fight back. Easy enough
But what the FUCK is with so much effort being spent to destroy femininity too? And what, if anything could even be done? It's actually fucking horrendous, from both a political and social perspective.

>>513942405 (OP)
You voted for this.

>>513942405 (OP)
>but I hardly ever hear much about the war on femininity
Post tits or gtfo

They've stood the problem on its head and missed the central issue. The problem with women isn't femininity. The problem with femininity is women.

>>513942617
You dont want to see my hairy nipples, anon. I just miss actual femininity in the world. Enjoying being around women is part of being a straight man, but that part of life has been systematically eradicated. I find that upsetting

>>513942405 (OP)
not the most politically correct expression, but I'd say ever since the French Revolution (not to say smartphones & obama) "the niggers are running the plantation"

>>513942405 (OP)
>Attention seeker
>Fickle
>Overly emotional
>Petty
>Dramatic
>Neurotic
>Unrelatable
Here's that based femininity you ordered, wifeguy

>>513942839
I have my own flaws, some of which surely are due to me being male.
The items you've listed are typical annoyances, but theres no possible way they could cause SO many problems thus as they do if they were not enabled to the Nth degree by every government and control system there is

>>513942747
There's no such thing as "femininity". It's the same Disney fairy tale designed to trick men into taking legal and financial responsibility for women. Women are nasty cunts and only do the bare minimum when forced to.

>>513942985
By force is an option I find acceptable. Its just not typically my go-to. Maybe we are a little more fuckarink'd than I thought kek

>>513943107
Ok so then there is no "attack" on femininity. It was always a lie. Women put on makeup and bat their eyelashes because it casts a spell on men, and causes men to hand over their wallets. If you were to properly define the word "femininity", it's nothing more than deception and theft.

>>513943238
>men used to enforce femininity, as defined by men
>jews and their associated control structures hijack, corrupt, and eventually destroy that
>this is not an attack
This is where our opinions diverge, I guess.

>>513942405 (OP)
That's just like my gf

>>513942405 (OP)
A feminine woman is any woman I'm emotionally attracted to.

Doesn't encouraging women to be less feminine and more masculine imply that women are worth less

>>513942985
Let me guess, white people don't have culture and racism = prejudice + power?

>>513943398
It might be because you're framing it as if women are victims in this. Theyre not. What you're really describing is an attack on Patriarchy, not femininity.

>>513944130
you're retarded

>>513944150
I don't entirely disagree and it wasn't a semantics game kek
I just didnt understand your position but now I do.

>>513944371
Ok well the reason I'm pedantic is because society has a subconscious bias to assume women are always helpless victims when the complete opposite is true. Men are 2nd class citizens compared to women, even when we had a proper Patriarchy women still received most of the privileges while men were forced to suffer and die to keep women living in luxury.

So like I said, it's really an attack on men and Patriarchy.

It's for the same reason as everything else; the (((powers that be))) want humanity reduced to a monoculture of unthinking, completely predictable debt-enslaved consoomers with no inconvenient differences in personality or language or taste to complicate business and reduce economic efficiency.

>>513942405 (OP)
Men are retreating from relationships, from institutional demands, from collective obligation. Not by cowardice, nor nihilism, nor weakness but by sacred refusal to collude with a world that has hollowed out the feminine into parody and severed eros from its mythic root.
This retreat is not a conscious movement toward soul, for most men have not heard of soul. It is not a deliberate descent into myth, for most don't remember the myths. And yet it happens, everywhere.
Men retreat not in search of the feminine within but in search of refuge. They turn away from real relationships, work, education, not because they hate women, but because the outer feminine devoid of beauty, of function, of soul has become unrecognizable and if given a choice between emptiness and the parody, they choose emptiness. They choose nothing rather than violate what remains of their inner integrity.
But it is there in the void that the great possibility stirs.
Even if they do not name her, do not know her, have never met her, still within that emptiness the anima awaits.
She does not need to be reimagined, reengineered, or "updated". She does not ask to be made familiar to the modern psyche. She need only be seen, once. As she is in the dark, without distortion, without irony, without demand.

This act of remembering is enough.

Because where culture collapses, myth re-emerges and where men descend into the silence beneath language, soul prepares its next eruption. The anima was never meant to be found in daylight; she is born in shadow, dwells in dream and speaks first through absence.
So let it be said: true virtue is born in darkness.
And when men meet her there not as escape, not as fantasy, but as a reawakening they will return. Not as obedient citizens of a broken world, but as bearers of the fire, as visionaries, warriors, poets, and builders, not of new systems but of meaningful life.

This is not disappearance, it's gestation.

>>513945099
Ok but we'll never fix it if we can't even describe it properly. There is no attack on femininity, it's an attack on Patriarchy which makes it an attack on men, and women eagerly signed up to attack.

Saying it's an attack on femininity makes it sound like an attack on women, but the opposite is true. It's an attack on men, and that is blatantly obvious if you just look around at any mainstream media, public education, etc etc. it's institutionalized now by an army of millions of White women in government. Women are NOT the victims and never have been.

>>513942405 (OP)
Invent women.

>>513945268
Been seeing this pasta evolve over time and while I think a lot of it is accurate: why spread your thoughts this way?
Even if I have an idea I think is really important, i at least take the time to write original posts about it kek

>>513945268
Based