What are we doing here anymore

Wow he said this unprompted with no context around it? That's crazy.

Collecting functional vintage firearms and ammunition.
Hoarding canned food.

Industrial revolution and....

>>513948618 (OP)
B--But you already have feudalism...

>>513948618 (OP)
Proponents of Feudalism always see themselves as the wealthy nobility and not the impoverished serfs being exploited by the system. I guarantee you an effete television personality like Tucker would have a complete mental breakdown if he had to do hard labor for a solid week straight.

>>513948618 (OP)
Going mask off glowie?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=0BI3DOtDyhI
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cynical-aloof-and-insatiable-rise-postmodern-state-aristocracy
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fascism-20-part-3-feudalism-20
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/tribalism-neo-feudalism-and-vise-technology-age-hyper-acceleration

>>513948618 (OP)
There's a grain of truth to this in that pre-modern social orders did impose reciprocal obligations whereby the upper classes had to (in theory) look after the lower classes and the general welfare of the polity in various ways, as opposed to now where they're completely unmoored from any such responsibilities

>>513948778
We pretty objectively do not. Serfs actually got something in exchange for fealty to the lord. What we have in modern times is simply slavery.

>>513948795
You don't get it. Tucker is saying that the modern American system is even worse than feudalism. Those impoverished serfs being exploited by the system? They had better lives than we do. WE are the impoverished serfs being exploited now. Except back then, serfs had far better opportunities for marriage/children. They worked less than we do too. And the nobility today are the wealthy donor class, the banksters, Big Pharma, and Big Tech. Oligarchs rule us. They are nobility in all but official title.

>>513948795
Feudalism doesn't mean "you work backbreaking labor", genuinely how do you even come to this kind of thinking? You literally do not understand what feudalism is. It says absolutely nothing about what kind of labor you do.

The feudal system is about trading loyalty (to a knight, lord, king, etc.) and in exchange receiving land and protection. Serfs didn't "own" their land (the king did), but the king let them use it and live on it as long as they were loyal to him (e.g. paid 'taxes'), and he had an express incentive to keep his serfs happy, safe, and productive because that:

1. Gave him more political/military power
2. Made him richer

Feudalism is objectively superior to what we have today. It was far closer to a fair exchange of value between different social classes than our current system of ruthless exploitation and wageslavery.

>>513949543
Don't forget
>Lord lived in close proximity to his subjects and the constant threat of peasant uprising.
The huge physical disconnect between modern rulers and the workers completely wrecks this dynamic.

Tucker makes all kinds of off-the-cuff obliquely sarcastic remarks like that in his interviews (and also public speaking events).

>>513949543
>genuinely how do you even come to this kind of thinking?
Renaissance propaganda.
>1. Gave him more political/military power
Serfs didn't fight wars; nobles did.

ITT people saying that feudalism was better without any shred of irony

>>513948618 (OP)
>this ideology and system of government is better than the other ideologies and systems of government
Has never once been true. The simple fact of the matter is that if there were a "this is the best ideology and system of government" then it would reign untarnished. but, thus far all have crumbled to the ground. Some faster than others, some more painfully than others, but none have withstood the test of time. Corruption always sinks in. Anything static always stagnates and then rots.

>but fascism is the best answer to that
kind of. it is a tool, and if wielded as a tool will clean out the societal detritus that has accumulated. But as a set and perpetual system of government? It simply doesnt work like that, which is why of all the systems of government it has the shortest life expectancy, followed by communism.
>how dare you say communism fairs better
it doesnt. its just that fascism is inherently meritocratous meaning once rot starts showing people are going to act. Communism is the opposite and therefor the rot is able to fester as a walking dead corpse for a bit longer. Monarchies lasted as long as they did/have because of the notion of "my appointment is divine" rendering citizens into an existential crisis before action is taken.
>well then what is your solution smart guy
I dont think there is one. I think the issues that need to be addressed are piecemeal and thus require a piecemeal approach to bridging those gaps, as in fascism is a tool, when fascism is needed we ought to take it out of the tool box. when things are sorted and vile cunts have been dealt with then bust out the classical liberalism. etc.
>but where are you gonna find someone with so much merit that theyd take the helm of a fascist government and step down entirely for a classical liberal government.
Great men rarely come one after the other so there probably isnt a perfect solution.

>>513949754
this is a good point. if you sperg into the various times that a nobleman approached his king you will find that the vast majority of the time it was at the behest of his peasants. whether this was out of a noble sense of responsibility towards them or because they were annoying him or because he was worried about a revolt does not matter, the peasants had representation. And in that regard it was far more democratic than the nonsense we have now because most of the time if enough peasants were annoying enough lords the king would do something about the issue. and whether what the king did was smash the peasants or appease their demands he did something, the faggotry we got now they just fucking ignore it outright most the time giving it lipservice at best.

There is something just not right about governments that change as often as the wind.

>>513949830
During wars, it was common for armies to live "from the land". Meaning, when army arrived, locals had to give up their food. And farmers had to live what soldiers did not take. Like, food which was meant as animal feed and similar.

>>513950049
>Monarchies lasted as long as they did/have because of the notion of "my appointment is divine" rendering citizens into an existential crisis before action is taken.

Monarchies still exist. Places like Saudi Arabia, or Sweden.

But about Communism. It spread as wildfire, because of increased literacy and lower costs to print some materials. Paper has became more budget-friendly. While, in medieval times, parchment was way more expensive.
Also, in medieval times people had less need to move around, which limited spread of ideas.

>>513948618 (OP)
He’s saying kill jews

>>513949855
Read the thread. It's about criticizing the modern system and how the vast majority are treated even worse than serfs and get less back for their labor than occurred with feudalism, historically.

>>513948795
The average serf had 50 acres and only had to pay like 7% of their surplus as tax. They were infinitely better off than I'd economically.

>>513949543
>Feudalism doesn't mean "you work backbreaking labor"
It absolutely does, it is kind of shit we have now but much worse.

>>513951119
Sweden is still a modern (((democracy))) though, they have elections and shit

>>513952298
They are constitutional monarchy. But still, a monarchy.
Point was, that monarchies as systems are still present and around. They are not extinct. Not yet.
May be will even expand. Who knows what will happen with Belarus and Best Korea.

>>513950520
But would this boost the productivity to help our economy compete on the world market?

>>513949054
pointless conversation because it would be impossible to implement feudalism in the new world according to it's strengths. feudalism succeeded because government revolved around long standing traditional families with ties to the culture and land. None of the elites in the new world represent that anymore

>>513948618 (OP)
>I HATE OUR JEW OVERLORDS
>I LOVE OUR FAMILY DYNASTY OVERLORDS

Btw all monarchy/feudalism retards are submissive faggots.

In Medieval Feudalistic systems, the hierarchy was opaque and the king and his liege lords at least had duties to peasants.

Now we have an elite who is totally unaccountable and does whatever the fuck they want with zero punishment. Justice for the "king" doesn't exist anymore. Elites fail upwards their entire lives and never apologize or make amends for anything. This is why people hate liberalism. Of course Feudalism now would look a lot like libtardism, because the elites do not fear God. Fear of God kept people honest.

>>513948795
Tucker is rich old money. He would be the feudal lord.

>>513953465
They literally invited Jews into their countries to scam the people for them, married into their Jewish bloodlines, and proudly support mass migration, WEF, globohomo, etc but right wingers will still suck their old royal cocks because 1000yrs ago one of their ancestors fought in the Crusades or some shit.

>>513948618 (OP)
Monarchy is a good system of government because it follows natural hierarchy.

Any system of government which claims to invert reality (i.e. the people rule over government instead of government ruling over people) is evil and gives power to the most dishonest and unscrupulous.

Slaves in the bible were taxed 20%. "Free" people today are taxed more than ancient slaves.

Freedom, democracy, and human rights, have led humanity to their lowest most cattle-like existence in history.

A system of privileges rewards the best. A system of rights rewards the worst.

We need to eliminate human rights, eliminate voting, and bring back absolute monarchy. The magna carta was a mistake.

In the medieval world, shitty "kings" like Blair, Bush, and the Clintons would all be swinging from nooses by now. In modern times our "bad" kings not only never face judgment, but then they get cushy retitements and continue to arrogantly preach about how everyone else is wrong and they are right.


Being a liberal means never having to admit that you were wrong.

>>513953848
Prince Andrew is a creep

>>513951518
I sorry, dear American gentleman from across the ocean, but my peasant cannot read.

>>513949855
Let's go, Mykola, it's time to plow the fields...

>>513948778
Feudalism land is owned by the king and rented off to lower hands to work or hire people to work on parts. We don't have one leader who owns everything or even close to most things. Theres large corps, which own a lot, but they are groups of owners. No king.

>>513953846
In the case of England, they brought Jewish financiers in to lend money to finance wars and when they couldn't pay back the loans, they simply killed the Jews lol. They didn't hand the keys of the kingdom over to Jews like liberals did post war.

In monarchy subjects are treated better than foreigners.

In democracy foreigners are treated better than citizens.

>>513954064
And Blackrock, Vanguard, big tech etc have no concept of 'noblesse oblige'. They simply donate to more globohomo NGOs and build compounds for themselves in the tropics. The rulers of the past at least had to pretend to give a shit about the little people. That pretense is completely gone now with our transitory global elite.

>>513948618 (OP)
He's not wrong
At least land holding lords had the considerations of the peasants working the land beneath them. They needed to be fed, protected and cared for to some extent. Unlike the state of modernity now where you can get on board or get run over by multinational corporations and their political cronies.

>>513948795
Feudal lords at least had the expectation that they would operate under the principal of noblesse oblige
there is no such expectation these days

>>513948618 (OP)
>What are we doing here anymore
I am Lord.
I take command.
https://youtu.be/gPz8iGXyB1U?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
Thats exactly what the technocrat elites want, neo feudalism. Tucker is such a fucking kike rat.

>>513949543
Based.
Imma feudalist now.

>>513948778
At least "we" had women, not France though...country of cucks

>>513949054
This is some weird jewish psyop trying to convince us to become serfs again. Not that we're that far off.

>>513954682
Kings did not let their serfs get raped by invaders.

>>513954094
> In monarchy subjects are treated better than foreigners

Lmao, subjects were treated as their class. A foreign dignitary that’s royalty or nobility would be treated better than most of the king’s mid to lower class. It happed all the time.

>>513950520
The representation bit is interesting.
Right now it's claimed that we have 1 representor for every 60k citizens, but that's an old figure.
With the present Dutch citizenship figures, 1 representor represents 286666 people.
Each landlord would've represented some of his workers, and in turn the nobleman would represent the landlords with the taverns and shops in his jurisdiction. Maybe 20 people.
By the time a king had assembled his army, there were thousands of noblemen in it, lower level aristocracy.
We have 150 politicians in the Dutch parliament, and nobody with his head screwed on straight thinks they represent anything but the globohomo corporate Jew.

>>513954064
>Feudalism land is owned by the king and rented off to lower hands to work or hire people to work on parts
This is exactly what happens with tech moguls, who rent their platforms for a fee so people can use them in every single business in our digital age. They are beyond bourgeoisie now.
>We don't have one leader who owns everything or even close to most things.
But feudalism was originally not very centralized anyways. The actual power was held by regional feudal lords (like big corps nowadays) during the middle ages. It was only after centuries that kings started to hoard riches from colonies and start getting absolute power.

>>513954533
That said,
My loyalty isn cheap!
With basic loyalty fees, you get a law abiding citizen. With premium fee, you get a passionate speaker for Kings behalf. With premium+ monthly subscription fee, you get a first class strategist and a cunning tactician.
(I also reserve the righst to peepering tom / masturbational activities in kings palace with full impunity)

>>513948795
And they’re right to. You think Tucker Carlson would’ve been a peasant? Lmao. Get real you idiot.

>>513948795
This illiterate fucking ape doesn’t even know that feudal society was still filled with people in creative and intellectual occupations. Tucker Carlson would’ve been a clerk or something. YOU would’ve been struggling peasant dumbass.

>>513951889
That's just what the local landlord made the serfs do.
Some did, some didn't.
Bosses at work are exactly the same.
A lot of people can't handle the power dynamic with respect and abuse it so they feel good about themselves.

>>513949054
Um anon, unlike serfs you can save your money at your meaningless computer job and use it to secure a loan to a bank for a house a third the size of the average peasant homestead and take a cruise once every 5 years. You live in the best time to be alive!

>>513948778
I'm kinda ashamed that a frog fails to realize we live in such an obvious plutocracy.

Being a serf is better. You give up part of your harvest to your Lord and 10% to the Church and keep the rest. Technically it's a 6 day week but you get a ton of Saint's days as holiday on top of the big ones like Christmas etc. You can only work during daylight. You need permission to travel but it is almost always given, 100% if you are going on pilgrimage. There are wars but usually in foreign lands so it can be decades between happenings in your area. You can quit at any time by going on crusade or joining a monastery. Guaranteed wife.

>>513955808
You want feudalism?
You know what to do:
>>513955165
>Subscribe today - 10% off for premium serf.

>>513948714
He's lost the thread. His outing a few weeks ago as definitely CIA has made him desperate. But nothing will un-reveal what he revealed about himself.

>>513948795
Oh but he's your "roll up your sleeves" neighbor guy who you usually see fixing his tractor.

>>513955000
In fact not only DID they let them do that, they also taxed them until they were literally living in dirt. Hence why MANY kings were killed.

>>513954004
Lmao

>>513955000
o/

>>513949543
A lord had a land allocation.
A knight had no land allocation but was free, therefore he worked a job, being a knight.
A serf was bound to the land. He could not up and leave. He had to give a share of the produce to his lord who owned the land.

Nobody said serfs were not allowed to be happy. But your picture is distorted.

>>513949757
So if they're bullshit they were sarcastic? I used to give him the benefit of the doubt like that. Now that he said "I hate hate hate the CIA" in the same interview with Candace Owens that revealed he's definitely CIA, I don't give him any benefit of doubt.

>>513956220
The kings did the raping, they didn't let foreigners rape their serfs.

>>513949830
After all serfs had nothing to defend. But I suppose they could be enlisted to fight for their lord, maybe the lord was nice to them, bribed them, threatened them.

>>513955039
In democracy foreign criminals with mentally retarded IQs get to live in 5 star hotels paid for by the working class citizens.

Either you get a system where nobility are treated like nobility or you get a system where the lowest dregs of humanity are treated like nobility.

Your desire to tear down your superiors has elevated your inferiors above you.

>>513948618 (OP)
good question
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0
find hanz whetter

>>513951629
But that cannot be provided now due to population increase.

>>513956220
Why pyramids were built?
For ayylmaos?
>only partly true.
Ayylmaos actually don't need much.
>they were built to provide jobs for people.
>hence keep them preoccupied
Longer it took to build one, the better.

ITT: fatherless zoomer muttoids fantasizing about have an authority figure in their life. kang is substitute for dad that left him :(

>>513953848
>Monarchy is a good system of government because it follows natural hierarchy.

Any system of government which claims to invert reality (i.e. the people rule over government instead of government ruling over people) is evil and gives power to the most dishonest and unscrupulous.

It does seem that way. You still end up with the government running a lot of things, but when they are fucked up, they blame you. "You didn't vote hard enough."

>We need to eliminate human rights, eliminate voting, and bring back absolute monarchy. The magna carta was a mistake.
Maybe a small point in this context, but the Magna Carta was a deal between the king and the lords. The serfs and landless peasants were not involved in it. Often the king stood up for the human rights of the serfs against their lords.

>>513956425
Europe's entire history is us raping and killing each other, occasionally kings and queens would get married to try to stop the raping, then the raping would commence again. Why do you think America and Australia even exist in the first place? To get away from the asshole king.

>>513956425
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OWMB3ewpNM

>>513957002
So we could rape without any king stopping us?

Australia was where England sent prisoners. America was voluntary settlement except for African slaves.

>>513957002
>us
HELLO FELLOW WHITES

>>513957002
Yes, yes, yes.
Wanna know what it is all really about?
>grinding stones!
>pressure cookers!
>with splendid ingredients!
To make absolute, total diamonds, that are many many times worth all the hard labor.

>>513948618 (OP)
>James Lindsay

Ah yes, the grand protector of the American Project(tm) and general boomer values. You know someone who's got similar foreign policy to Hilary and Dick Cheney can't be wrong about American affairs.

>>513957350
I actually knew my European grandparents before they died, can you say the same Pablo?
>>513957304
>Australia was where England sent prisoners
This is 50% meme. Many people wanted to go to Australia to begin life anew, many of which were poor farmers who sold everything they had to go there.

>>513954221
Yes, which is tuckers point. Not that feudalism is correct, but that weve been living under hyperboomer capitalism (civic nationalists / libertarians) for too long, that somehow (to boomers) because India has so many Indians, America therefore should have too many Indians, that exporting wealth from our country to others is good, that replacing white people in their own nations is good. Because despite the liberals being the ones that outright say it, the boomer right fundemenrally believe it too because that is the free market and what is best for bottomlines.

>>513957002
>>513957457
I believe it was Voltaire who said:
>in an absolutely perfect world, people would get their dose of misery from a pen dropping to floor.

He wasn't wrong.

>>513956423
>8 pbtid

>>513948618 (OP)
How is it any different? You really think you own your land if they can take it from you?

>>513948618 (OP)
We have feudallism. Digital feudalism.

>>513957948
This.
If you need to pay tax for the land "you own" - you don't own shit. You just pay full price then rent it.
>The one who has the last say - owns.

>>513955159
Your being hyperbolic though, your missing a KEY step. Between feudalism, which directly leased off land, who directly used labor, (often slavery) there was industrial revolution, which required less people to produce more, which freed the slaves, but it cost investment of money (promise of more money) to build factories. This lead way to capital, which allowed factories to scale, creating more jobs, instead of less. We are in hypercapitalism phase aka late capitalism. Engels and marx predicted closer to whats happening now then they were wrong about over 100 years ago. If their predictions continue to be true, then communism is inevitable conclusion.

>>513956506
>be nobleman
>go to war at the king's orders
>it is what it is
>battle happens
>it goes terribly
>a man strike you mortally
>as you fade you notice no escutcheon on his shield
>your last thought is that you got killed by a fucking serf

>>513948795
imagine being this transgender

>>513958159
The digital landscape is layered on top of a physical one. The physical world is operating on late capitalism /early socialism.

>>513948618 (OP)
>Hey we fucked democracy so lets change the system completely so tech billionares can be our feudal overlords!


Hmmm, no. How about we just revert back from this tainted democracy instead? Women don't get a vote. white men only get a vote. Land owners only get a vote. You know, LIMITED democracy, which is the intention in the first place. EVERYONE getting a vote, has fucked everything up, because the average person is braindead.

>>513958159
tucker is advocating for corporate fuedalism, and a return to indentured servitude.
i thank God everyday that life is short.

>>513948795
> judging an out of context quote
Your a fucking retard.

>>513948618 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9Zmkw2KLN4

>>513958458
You never even listened to that piece dumbass. He is not advocating for either. He is saying for as bad as we think of feudalism, it is better then what we have now in many ways. Not to return to it, but to critique our current failures and problems.

>>513949830
>Serfs didn't fight wars; nobles did.
yeah, thats never happened, they get their meatshields to kill each other off then they go drinking.

I'm exhausted with everyone saying X political system wouldn't work now. Almost any of the commonly touted political systems could now work because a more streamlined economic system would simply allow them to.

>>513956512
> Your desire to tear down your superiors has elevated your inferiors above you.

Lmao, take your meds. Your faggot submissive desire to have a king doesn’t mean it was any better back then.

>well at least muh niggers

You’d be a nigger status in feudalism land, dumbass. Like commies, you retards fantasize about being land owners when you’d be living in a shit hut and prolly eating stale bread everyday.

>chud realizes we live in a capitalistic nightmare
>instead of arguing for more holidays, less work hours, stronger unions
>he argues for king trump instead

>>513948618 (OP)
>wealthy landowning individual wishes to own human chattel again
>but hes a based rightwinger so its worth it to be a chattel slave
If it was fucking Bill Gates saying this shit youd be on guard because youd know the idea was evil. Now you see the right foot coming to stomp on your neck instead of the left foot and you cheer. Fucking stupid niggers.

>>513948618 (OP)
It's incomparable because of how much different the world has been.
How tf do you imagine feudalism today in secularized urbanist post-industrial bullshit jobs driven shitscapes where wealth is made not on the land with plows and peasant labour but on stock market with chutzpah and empty promises?

If people only knew what money really is.


Sigh.


Money is not a magical thing. Not even a mystical thing. WITHOUT money you can trade things for things.
Now, in a moneyless world, you would need a new pair of shoes. You would either make the pair your self, or, go look for someone who's better at it. Then you find one, ask what he/she wants in return. He (let's assume the shoemakers gender) wants new leather underpants. You don't have such, you only have a bag of salt. So, you first need to find a guy who makes leatherpants, then ask what he wants for trade? He wants a new chimney. Then you need to figure out how to turn your bag of salt to all the things in the chain, so that you finally get a pair of new shoes!

PHEW!

Money is to erase those stupid loops and hoops and just buy what you need.

Most stable currency, in theory, is based on the sum of all wealth of the nation (arbitrary value number), that takes into account destroyed wealth and newly generated wealth.

How does the actual "growth" happen? By importing niggers? No way, hose.
>John and Jill buys an old house that needs to be renovated. That INVEST X amount. They put in their own labor Y (everything amazing, discoball in bedroom roof and everything) - they sell it for PROFIT Z. Profit is the "surplus" after the expenses including labor. This PROFIT is the "mystic" GROWTH that impacts the economy at large.

>>513959206
The issue here is irresponsible spending. Capitalism doesn't even enter that equation. This is another issue: false equivalence.

>>513948618 (OP)
>Its either this or feudalism
Nice false dichotomy WASPkike.

>>513959127
You submit to paying more tax than slaves paid to the pharaoh.

You submit to having your homeland flooded with foreigners.

You submit to being a victim of crime who will be punished by the state if you harm criminals.

You are far more submissive than any subject of any king ever was.

>>513959241
Neo-feudalism will essentially be debt peonage on steroids bolstered by A.I. surveillance and an upper class even more wealthy and untouchable than even the wealthiest medieval king.

Instead of being born a peasant tending crops you will be born into a modern world were everything is rent and subscriptions and only the 1% are allowed to own anything. If you ever get sick or can't work you are cast into the untouchable homeless class where you will die from disease or exposure as the country no longer has any social services or safety nets and police are given the power to throw you in jail for being homeless where you will either be killed by other inmates or worked to death on a chain gang.

The future is a digital prison cell.

>>513949054
slavs get free housing and food

>>513948618 (OP)
Americans didn't have the middle ages and have no idea what they're talking about.

>>513953848
>Slaves in the bible were taxed 20%. "Free" people today are taxed more than ancient slaves.
Slaves by definition can no own things. They are things others own.

>>513948618 (OP)
You already live in feudalism, the only difference is that the modern aristocracy doesn't use stupid titles.

>>513959700
>You submit to paying more tax than slaves paid to the pharaoh

And I have much better living conditions, better pay. Slaves had….what?

>You submit to having your homeland flooded with foreigners

It’s hilarious to think monarchies gave a shit about anything outside of their castle and much less about being less woke, you fucking retard.

> You submit to being a victim of crime who will be punished by the state if you harm criminals

I can give you a giant screen so you can project some more.

>>513948618 (OP)
Kek what a retard.

>>513948618 (OP)
When is he going to call out kikes?

>>513949543
Feudalism traps people in social castes. There is no non-violent way to leave your caste. It doesn't matter how brilliant a serf might be, he won't be able to better his position due to being born a serf.

>>513960299
No sumptuonary laws, no binding to land, no corvee, no levee, no tithe, no guilds, no job limitations, no bans on forestry and fishing etc....

>>513949543
>you will own nothing and be happy
>canada flag
you will never be a woman faggot glownigger

>>513960206
Slaves can own property. "Free" people in democracies can't own anything (i.e. property tax).

>>513960323
You have a worse life than slaves and you pay higher taxes.

Subjects of a king didn't get ethnically replaced in their own homeland.

Monarchy being the smallest possible government that minds its own business is a good thing.

>>513959700
>You are far more submissive than any subject of any king ever was.

It took half a century, after two most devastating wars, after medically altering people (birth control pills and other chemicals, via for example tampons), decades of indoctrination, feminization of boys and eliminating MAN..
>YET HERE WE ARE MOTHERFUCKER.
>Yuri saved us.
https://youtu.be/VEJ8lpCQbyw?feature=shared

>>513960715
We have no property tax.

>>513960502
>genetics isn't real
Anti-monarchy people are just woke leftists.

Know how I know the tyranny we live under today is greater than any in the past?

Because you people mock those who suggest you're living under it.

Slaves in chains know they're slaves, but you're slaves of the mind...you can't even see that you've already been conquered from the inside out.

>>513960502
>how brilliant a serf might be
lmao. how about "just as brilliant as a serf might be". chandala faggot.

>>513959925
And why do you call it neo-feudalism and not neo-slavery? Even though I think that this system is different enough even from slavery that it warrants its own unique name.

Gen z is so fucking lazy they'd rather have a zero property and be controlled by royalty instead of working hard for upward mobility lmao

>>513960816
The idea high-caste people cannot be retarded is the most braindead psyop you could possibly attempt. There is no logic connection. You're an enemy of the people and should be lynched.

>>513960902
The modern nightmare has a name: democracy.

Democracy believers are like communists. They think "democracy" means "good thing" so when they see that it is bad they imagine it is something other than democracy.

It's just democracy. Letting people vote is an inversion of hierarchy and bad outcomes are guaranteed.

>>513961007
A retarded golden retriever is still a golden retriever.

The best pit bull is still a pit bull.

>>513960502
Why can't you just let him enjoy his caste, like god intended? What has he ever done to you to deserve your hate? You monster.

>>513948778
If we have feudalism we would be flourishing under prosperity.

>>513960502
>Feudalism traps people in social castes. There is no non-violent way to leave your caste.
This is true for most people today as well, let's be real. Feudalism probably won't be making a comeback, but not for this reason.

>>513961142
Eugenic slop. You definitely need to die.

>>513961237
>God Emperor's happiness makes me happy?
https://youtu.be/h5FAnTdoZ4c?feature=shared

>>513960715
> You have a worse life than slaves and you pay higher taxes

You don’t even know the life quality of slaves to even be saying that you clown. I have central air conditioning which makes summer heat non existent for me, you think Slaves ever had a good fucking shelter, let alone a good quality of life? Lmao.

> Subjects of a king didn't get ethnically replaced in their own homeland.

Subjects did their job or they starved. Nobody cared for you, native or not.

> Monarchy being the smallest possible government that minds its own business is a good thing.

Pretty sure most old wars were done by kings who sent his beloved subjects to die in petty noble land squabbles, retard.

>>513960502
I think you might be confusing western feudalism with Indian case system here, Ramjeet. There was no problem moving from peasant to freeman or merchant or tradesman or a mercenary/soldier. You could only not become on noble your own, only a king could grant you the title, but neither can you become an owner of Blackrock or a major shareholder of some pillar of world economy company today - someone from the inside would have to give it to you.

>>513960502
Not true.
Through mercantile and knighthood, various military actions one could advance in castes.
The problem is that most serfs were deeded farms and that is their livelihood, you needed 90%+ agricultural workers.
If you were born a farmer there were not many opportunities.

>>513960902
Slavery implies physical restraints and obvious coercion with things like slave catchers and overseers. Feudalism unlike slavery relies on social structures and softer forms of coercion to keep the peasants in line. Even during medieval times a peasant could theoretically wander off the kings land but to do so was to risk getting killed by bandits or enemy troops and so forth. In our own modern system you are similarly theoretically free to quit your job and try to go off grid but then the government has permission to seize your property for failure to pay taxes and you will likely die from disease or starvation since you can't pay for treatment or food.

Actual slaves could not wander off the plantation without breaking the law and being forcibly compelled to return. See how that works? Its not inventing new words just for the hell of it, its using language to accurately describe differences.

>>513961666
>See how that works?
Yes, but you forgot to mention:
>in the Jungle.

>>513961666
checked btw.

Where does an alpha wolf walk in a wolf pack?
In front?
Nope.
>In back.
This way He can observer the whole pack all the time.
In front is the elders and the weak. In the middle are the toughest and the females and cubbs. Last one is the Alpha, to handel any surprise attacks.
>Most wise.

>>513961666
And where the vassal-suzerain relationship in all this? You assume the world rotated around peasants but it was more about the relationship of king with lords. There were also guilds, freemen and cities whose citizens weren't anyone's peasants.
You describe more of some Mesopotamian shit from early bronze age.

>A society is composed of it's people.
A famous line, one Finnish OG got prosecuted for back in 2007 or something. It was and still is a meme in Finland. Can't remember his name rn. Wasn't Kalle Ellilä, he was an infamous hc punk singer who died..

What this means is that people within a certain geographical area, usually within borders protected by leathal force, forms whatever society they like and what is like they are. A society reflecting Her people. That is the ideal.

>>513949282
I can own my land in this system, it is not a kings or lords. Right?

The idea of PROFIT based society - where corporations dictates - is so stupid, I haven't yet even began to comprehend the depths of it.

>>513949543

you're a fucking retard.

Then again you are canadian and you all never did kick the crown off your lands. You beg for Charlie's dick.

You all let China conduct military drills on your land, and let India start killing your own citizens that were critical of its national policies on your own soil.

you're all cucks.

>>513963097
For ONE.
The rule number ONE of ALL corporation CEOs:
>HIRE ALWAYS PEOPLE WHO DUMBER THAN YOU

There. Self explaining premise - to ALL this bullshit. But, you need more than TWO braincells to ferret it out.

>>513962950
In democracy because it is a dishonest system which claims to invert reality (i.e. the people rule over government instead of government ruling over people) they will tell you that you can own land but charge you property tax which means you don't actually own land. They can also use eminent domain to confiscate land you imagine you own, for the purpose of building migrant housing or carbon capture pipelines or whatever other communist scheme they want and there's nothing you can do about it because democracy ensures nobody is ever held accountable.

>>513954362
Lords had to be an extension of the king, if you had a shitty king, everyone had a shitty life because if you had a good lord who over stepped his loyalty, the king would kill him and then install some cocksucker who would make everyone's lives miserable.

Mad, bro?
https://youtu.be/qyzqmGhkrPg?list=RDqyzqmGhkrPg&t=5

>>513963418
Kings didn't give power to 'shitty' people for the same reason a farmer wouldn't hire someone who harms his farm animals.

In monarchy subjects have value and are therefore protected by the king.

In democracy citizens are a liability and are therefore replaced with immigrants.

>>513948618 (OP)
Why would Tucker say this with no context or elaboration?

wtf, I’m a weird gay kid in a basement now!

>>513948795
>not the impoverished serfs being exploited by the system.
What's different about the current system?

>>513963656
I have no clue what Tucker has said or haven't said.
My thumb feel of Tucker is that, he's been on a nice cruise all his life.
>professional "air sniffers" has told him to go this way early on.
He obviously has a staff.
Anyways, he is riding the right wave atm.
>only as long as he can keep up with it
>he won't dictate the wave(s)
>I do.

>>513963418
>if you had a shitty king, everyone had a shitty life
If you had a shitty king his chad brother/uncle would be supported by the kings vassels and if the king was bad enough he would be removed from power and replaced by the chad. This happened all the time.

>>513948618 (OP)
The Swanson Frozen Dinner family heir SPEAKS.

>>513949754
This is the close to the most important part.

A lords power was tied to his people, if his people became disgruntled, his guard would also feel a portion of that.

Most revolutions were not the peasants overpowering the guard, but the guard standing aside knowing any who would punish them will soon be dead. Even an ideologically aligned guard would fall to self preservation.

Now as society decays, the power given to police comes from afar. They will continue to receive material and even military support and will continue to do their job.

The window for revolution becomes ever smaller as the price for crossing the threshold becomes greater. If it isn’t already impossible without complete collapse, it may soon be.

Which touches on another subject, if the peasants of old killed their king, they go right back to growing their own food. If supply chains are disrupted, millions will die.

>>513949054
This is the case

Where I want things to go, is where Father wants things to go:
>let the outter world reflect the inner world

>>513948618 (OP)
It's a late millennium split in the upper class between mercantilism and traders vs the landed aristocracy.
Generally the landed aristocracy had some loyalty to the provincial population.

Tucker can't articulate this. It's also a bit stupid to present 1600 aristocratic privileges as the only alternative to the last 15-20 years.

>>513960502
castes still exist except they rebranded "being born into certain class" as "being born with more opportunities"

Now, the world around IS the same no matter how we look at it.
>BUT!
If we look at it like this:
>it is pure cosmic humor
Everything in the outter world literally is that.
>women asked which they would prefer to meet in woods, a man or a bear - they choose bear.
:DDDD
All of it, pure comedy - IF YOU LOOK AT IT that way.

>>513948618 (OP)
Techno-feudalism or anarcho-tyranny
Take your pick

>>513962061
Interesting

>>513962203
If you want me to keep lecturing you and teaching you the nuances of how modern society organizes itself at some point I am going to have to start charging you tuition lol. Yes of course there are more classes than just king and peasants. Modern militaries which give soldier free college tuition, special loan rates at banks, free Healthcare, and preferential hiring are obviously analogous to knights in the same way being a knight was a step up from the bottom rung. We still have a priestly class although anymore their role is also fulfilled by the media telling people what to think and believe. You have the various corporations using lobbyists to petition the government for favorable laws much like vassals sought audience with the king to curry favor back in the day. Corporate support and donations are necessary for any candidate to become king/president of the government. Etc. Etc. I would think that such things would be obvious because the way humans organize themselves hierarchically never does shift too far away from the feudal model. Primarily our main difference is that our kings rule by divine right of Capital instead of divine right from God.

>>513964778
That said - hard, real issues, remains to be solved. Most of the basic issues like plumbing and toilets have been figured out.
So, no matter HOW we see the world, the real issues remains.
This is where modern politics comes in. They don't deal with REAL issues. Only imaginary issues.

>>513964856
>Interesting

https://youtu.be/UtK_Nh0E7JE?feature=shared

The entire thread is a giant false dichotomy lmao. Genetic serfs get the rope as much as their genetic masters.

call me crazy but I like the extremist individualistic ideology of the west that we got from Athens. Of course it starts to fail when you import collectivist indians.

>>513964846
>Techno-feudalism
No.

My keyboard's batteries died. I must have hit them hard rn. Like I did to my ex wife.

>>513960502
>Feudalism traps people in social castes.
You actually reckon there's much social mobility today? Just because you hopped on a plane from India to Canada don't mean there's much social mobility. In fact, because you did that you decreased other peoples' social mobility. Remigration is inevitable, nigger.

Truth is, I never abused her, nor any of my ex gfs. They all miss me like you wouldn't believe.

Last night I saw a dream where a very special FRIEND (she) yelled at me:
>LEAVE HER NOW!

I was actually plotting so sweet revenge on her, all hell would have marvelled of it's brilliant design.
But, I have lost interest on that.

In order to do something, anything, one needs a peculiar feel to it, to be able to do it.
>if that feel is gone, the need to something is gone, too.

Have I been castrated?
>yes, and
>I allow it to happen.
If it is for the good, I give credits to where credit's are due. If it fails - I will rain all Hell upon thee who violated me like this, when I was most vulnerable. You will feel sucv HELL AND FURY NO ONE HAS EVER EVEN DREAMED OFF.
All that said, with completely cold heart.
https://youtu.be/6dLrOoxMOYY?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
The mask is officially off. Sadly, his followers are too retarded to see.

>>513961418
>I have central air conditioning
And what else do you have? Niggers, spics, and jeets? They make large swathes of places uninhabitable for any civilized person. They objectively decrease quality of life. I think you'll find most people will live without mod cons if it meant the niggers, spics, and jeets fuck off.
>Subjects did their job or they starved. Nobody cared for you, native or not.
No doubt you had to carry your own weight but you're naïve if you think homogenous communities didn't look out for each other.
>Pretty sure most old wars were done by kings who sent his beloved subjects to die in petty noble land squabbles, retard.
And now most wars involve democracies, what's your point? Oh my God every few decades we had to all meet in a field and have a fair knock against our enemies instead of the industrial scale slaughter we call war today, the horror of it all.

Economics?
>like plumbing.
LAW & ORDER?
>like plumbing.

But, uku uku!

Mad, bros?
https://youtu.be/t-6AxcF4HFk?feature=shared

We should require by LAW that Judges and Lawyers would show butt crack before, during AND after sessions.

Just like plumbers always do.
Just saying, SINCE IT AIN'T THAT HARD.
>And I don't mean my benis.

>>513948795
Serfs didn't live in their car while having one job at McDonald's and the other as a Uber.

>>513967240
>I’d rather be a slave because no niggers!

You do you, submissive faggot

> doubt you had to carry your own weight but you're naïve if you think homogenous communities didn't look out for each other

What is this fucking cope, homogeneous? You think the king being white means he gives a shit about all white people? They didn’t even give a fuck about people outside their castles ffs lmao.

>muh wars!

Which wars did you fight, faggot?

>>513968634
>>513968724
Jurisdiction and legal shit has been MADE to look hard. But in truth, it is always very simple.

>>513948618 (OP)
Neo-fedualism has long been the goal of millionaire CIA families such as the one Tucker was born into.

>>513948795
>I guarantee you an effete television personality like Tucker would have a complete mental breakdown if he had to do hard labor for a solid week straight.
His networth is over 100 million, all inherited. He made some money on his own too but he was born a millionaire. He's likely never pushed a lawn mower.

I know many 'influencer' looks at my posts with benises making salute.
>AT EASE, soldiers
The order of the day is:
>you go and give 'em Hell.
>a better one I could ever do - use what ever I have ever wrote, as your own.
I stand in the back and observe and keep our six checked.

Would be a shame if ofkom would get 25 000£ worth of döner kebabs on their door. Don't do it.
https://youtu.be/SffYrZQFCK0?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
>rich man fantasizes about the luxury of poverty

>>513951119
Communism spread only in the worst and most brutal part of Europe ruled by Russia. Even niggers were freed in America while 95% of Eastern Europeans were live stock told to kill their own children or starve to death. Eastern European serfdom was excessively brutal and that is why bolshevik communism was embraced so readily. Hundreds of years of grievances against murderous feudal lords. And by the way, every rich family killed by the Bolsheviks deserved it.

>>513948795
smartest democracy advocate
>>513962950
>I can own my land in this system, it is not a kings or lords. Right?
can you? what happens if you stop paying taxes?

>>513948618 (OP)
>anymore
I do not understand the rise of the use of "anymore" in this context.

>>513951629
That's quite simply a lie. Serfs owned no land but rather were owned by the land. If a manor Lord sold land the serfs were part of the deal.

>>513968823
>You do you, submissive faggot
You're ALREADY a slave you, clown, you're just too thick as pig shit to realize it. Slavery never ended, the slavers just refined their methods.
>The best kind of slave is one who doesn't know he is one
I disagree with this, the best kind of slave is one whose very nature is to be one and that's you.
>What is this fucking cope, homogeneous? You think the king being white means he gives a shit about all white people? They didn’t even give a fuck about people outside their castles ffs lmao.
Retard. Obviously the king didn't give a flying fuck but the societal structure was community oriented and homogenous communities look out for each other. The king didn't do shit for you but all the people living around you and many of whom were your relatives did, moron.
>Which wars did you fight, faggot?
Tell me you can't into reading comprehension without telling me you can't into reading comprehension, queer. You're harping on about the wars during feudal times when the reality is more people died in wars in the 20th / 21st centuries than in all wars in history previous to them you moron.

>>513948778
yeah, but how about MORE feudalism?

>>513949543
>Feudalism doesn't mean "you work backbreaking labor",
Feudal lords could:
>regulate how many children their serfs had
>kick them off the land with nothing at any time
>sell their serfs to other lords
>beat and punish their serfs as they saw fit
One Russian noblewoman became famous for punishing her female serfs via public rape and severe beatings and mutilation of genitals.

>>513965930
>Genetic serfs
My wife is from a long line of serfs. She's a hard worker but has no fight or rebellion in her. I, on the other hand, come from a long line of soldiers and adventurers. We are not the same, but it's a good marriage pairing. I have all the big picture planning and risk taking and she diligently toils away at mundane tasks.

>>513969231
>>513962061

>>513964687
Serfdom ended because only literally evil people could be cruel enough to maintain it. That's why it continued in russia for hundreds of years after it ended everywhere else in Europe.

The aristocrats laid low during the 20th century out of fear of Soviet Communism, but that's gone. Now the aristocrats want their legal status and privilege back. That's what you hear Tucker saying on behalf of his social class.

>>513953848
>The magna carta was a mistake.

The magna carta was void.
"A contract entered into under duress is void"

King John sent his attorneys to the Papal Curia the sole remaining juridical body of the former Roman Empire and argued the case against the barons and won and the pope issued a papal bull to confirm it.

>>513948778
Nope, we have something much worse than feudalism, under feudalism at least society was honest about it, people we’re not confused at all about the world they lived in.

Under modern day Neo democracy crony capitalism we have a divided population that is subverted by propaganda and has no conception who their rulers our and how their society operates.

Modern democracy is the worst system in history of man, it’s just Jews subverting the population and dividing them all the while the people have no clue what’s actually going on and think to themselves they have power to change things by voting

>>513969398
It would be most terrible, imagine, if it would happen during a sustainable period, like chinese water torture to all UK's Karen Industrial Complexes. About 1000 döners per day.
That would be terrible. I houpe it never habbens.

>>513954682
Ser you do understand that literal slaves of Egypt paid less taxes than we do today.

The difference between old days and today is honesty. Today is just all lying and gaslighting by governments when in old days they told the truth about things

>>513956220
That’s a key difference about old governments and new governments, old governments it was clear who was being incompetent and they’d get killed by the people for it, now new governments with democracy just blame the other side and people fight amongst each other when they are unhappy with their government

You mad, bro?
https://youtu.be/_DMX30c1yl4?feature=shared

>>513955808
Duke of Bohemia Wenceslas of Prague was canonized at broad popular request in 935 AD because he didn't flog or murder his male serfs and refrained from casually raping their children to satisfy an insane lust.

He was that unusual that not being a murderous rapist made him worthy of Sainthood and his own feast day in the church calendar.

https://youtu.be/SQVUMG6LZGM

>>513971142
>say high to Brutus, babe..
:)

Is he arguing for serfdom?

>>513956317
To be a knight one had to own a landholding capable of producing 56 head of cattle. This was the universal price from Cornwall to the Holy Land for one or two warhorses and a suit of armor and an iron sword. Such a parcel of land was called a "fief". Fiefs were inherited but church lands were not inherited, they were granted by either the church or the King. By 1100 all the available feifs were doled out. This meant that second and third sons etc were demoted from the aristocracy because if you divide a fief it can no longer support a mounted warrior, that is, a knight. A realm full of divided sub fiefs is no longer a realm capable of defending itself.

The fact that by 1100 there were no more fiefs and this created a revolutionary panic among younger sons. If they didn't want to get their heads shaved and be forced into a prison like monastery they desperately needed fiefs. Widows of dead barons became highly sought after. Thus the love poetry and songs of the middle ages as those younger sons desperately tried to woo widows. There weren't enough widows so soon they started creating widows. This quickly evolved to massive civil wars between younger sons and fief holders. Then they attacked church lands to turn them into fiefs.

The Pope stepped in and declared "the Peace of God" and then called for the crusades. The Fourth Crusade didn't even get to the holy land because the fief hungry mob wanted to seize the Byzantine aristocracy's fiefs.

>>513948618 (OP)
He knows I must become King

>>513971667
for and against, if you ask me.
>I don't know.
For example Finland - clearly hates all Her talenteds. Finnish "elite" are tit seekers. They really can't tell left from right without quidance from abroad.
So, Finland would be primed for Feudalism.
Sweden, to some decree, too. To some decree even more so.

However, some parts of Finland would have to be designated for the talents.
>they are valuable.
In these areas, they should be free from all burdens - except crimes against another:
>do what thou wilt, shall be the whole of the LAW - meant:
>do what you were BORN TO DO.
Not kicking the buckets if you wish. Cheeses.

>>513972158
Or Commando:
https://youtu.be/0jGflQQBzls?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
fuck the nobility and fuck the bourgeoise.
i refuse to be a slave to kikes

>>513972461
>i refuse to be a slave to kikes
Be slave then.

>>513972461
>>513972532
>..to kikes
Implies you wish to be a slave, but just not to kikes.
Desu.
Be precise.

What a fucking moron.

>>513972908
Tucker does his best, with his billion dollar surf board, riding this wave.
>doing fantastic job!
I have no bad say about him.

BUT
He is NOT from the root. He is an upperclass wonderboy - look all teeth came out, he's a miracle!
>no hard bumbs on his life - only gossip and the upper class "heat" that means 1:1 what cats feel with each others.

>>513972317
https://youtu.be/svyUMY2-TRQ?si=leULEXY8LKmdDi4Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCBQNsefwQo

>>513973571
Ooof,
From first note, hits hard.

>>513948618 (OP)
he's not wrong. The modern capitalist system has all the bad of feudalism and far more waste while allowing much less leisure and slacktime.

>>513973612
>>513973677
>listen both simultaneusly.

You have no way to figure out, am I good or bad?
>fruits of the tree!

Keep in mind - it is NOT about ME. It is all about TRUTH.
So, I do use mixed messages - stirr the stew as I see fit.
>Your job, is to TUNE this frequency of Truth.
After that - YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO.
>fountain heads - all of yous.

>>513948618 (OP)
hes a jesuit nigger, he just took the mask off.

Yes. I am Lucifer.
Real identifier: Lanonandek Son, Number 37, First Order.
>it checks up.

I've revelead, very smoothly great secrets here.
You wanna hear more?

Now,

Does it make any sense, that I, Prometheus / Lucifer would want YOUR demise?
No, it doesn't.

So, the "murderer since day one" has been poisoning the wells, if you will.
Since aeons ago, before our ancestors even spoke about the ancients.
>but it's not that long ago - only 250 000 years.
>cheeses.

>>513948618 (OP)
better . . . for who?

>>513948618 (OP)
We are under feudalism. The wealth of the world lies in the hands of just a few individuals

I have house pets - Silverfish - here, wonderfull little runners - 390 million years species!

All the Son needs to know from me:
>I am with thee, always have been, alway will.

>>513975262
>*always
be precise

But, FYI, I am a Son of North Helsinki.
When bullies were bullies, bullshit was bullshit - and - only toughest could walk.

I can name a dozen internationally famous bands from that school, that year - not to name all other champions in other less famous sports, Kiira is most known, but there's PLENTY of her kind.
>ALL BECAUSE OF ME.

https://youtu.be/Ca9OX9tFeEs?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
i hate yahweh and allah so much its unreal
>>513955315
they stoned fags back then too, you wouldnt have been any better off

>>513948778
It's pretty close to feudalism. Techno-corpo feudalism. That's what the tech bros want officially with not having to waste time buying off politicians.

I am such a bright star.
I need to find my own orbit, far from the Source.
>shine most loving light, but only for so long
>come ye too close - I will burn you up.
>"not my fault"

How many secrets I revealed here?
How many Truths?
>by fruits..

https://youtu.be/gy54o30wf50?feature=shared

>>513959127
>dumbass
>medposting
Eat shit, reddity faggot.

BTW - revealing a secret is = revealing Truth.
>Be precise.
>accept no bullshit, on tiniest levels

>>513959700
>You are far more submissive than any subject of any king ever was.
Not really, in medieval times peasants had even less rights than in modern times.

>>513977744
>*is not revealing truth
>I KNOW I typed it.

>>513954466
It was a poor choice of words. I haven't watched it yet but I'm guessing this is the context of medieval serfs in many ways having a better life than your average wage slave today. That said, it would be nice to hear some clarity against the technocrat plan to make us their cyberpunk serfs.

>>513977802
Maybe I didn't.
Who knows?

All intellectuelles here, and, nothing better to do ay?

https://youtu.be/tIqEmMxY8O4?feature=shared

Well, go be brilliant.
Consider this the kick on your ass you needed.

>>513958258
Supreme

>>513977769
Medieval peasants had the right to not call their son "she".

>>513948618 (OP)
>What are we doing here anymore
since 2016 you have been groomed by the technocrats to hand over your rights and your country to them with social media algorithms.

>>513977769
>Not really, in medieval times peasants had even less rights than in modern times.
Did medieval peasants have to legally let themselves be robbed, raped, and murdered by moors?
Prima Nocta was a myth.
Now we have something much worse than Prima Nocta could ever have been.

Go to the front lines Vasily and let them use the Vaseline on you in the barracks.

If your grandpa would put his arm on your shoulder and say:
>do it, kid

Would you hesistate?

>This is bigger.

>>513948618 (OP)
I voted for this.

le terrible..
>>513969398

>>513948795
I'm already an exploited serf. At this point I'd cheer on a feudal system being implemented because it almost guarantees I get to see my enemies killed and I'm no worse off and don't have to lift a finger. Not all kings are bad and I'd take a king that fucks off after I pay my taxes to whatever the fuck you want to call what we have now.
Long live the king.

>>513948618 (OP)
The right is pro-aristocracy and anti-democratic. He's been scoffing about democracy and Fox News has been praising Orban. The right wants a Putin. Vance has publicly supported the works of an anti-liberal monarchist.

Why? Less considerations and protections for workers and consumers. The rich want to get richer and have more control.

>>513978862
>The right is pro-aristocracy and anti-democratic
Lol Wut?

>>513978862
Private - you're head is about to be eaten, clean.

>>513959369
It's really not that simple. The entire economy is fake, and government spending is a small part of the problem. The problem is the banks.

>>513960816
Yeah and there isn't any evidence the noble castes were of actually good breeding.

>>513979105
That is correct.
It is all rigged.
>why I refuse to play

>>513948714
and wow you completely failed to understand the point.

>>513956029
what a thread!

>>513970402
There are those in his class who would be saying it for that reason, I'm pretty sure he's just talking about the hours worked etc meme.

Fact is
>I am worth so little by the numbers.
>they don't wan't to send death squads on me - because I COULD TAKE OUT FEW who are more worth than I am..

>all war is just simple math

>>513948618 (OP)
He’s right.

The "harm I do here", well you can't put it in numbers, can you?
https://youtu.be/vqN-AAfY61s?feature=shared

Truth will prevail.
>and so will YOU.

If you feel like it's scripted, it is
>by Me
>approved by God
Otherwise no such timelines.
>self evident

>The SON is all about SAVING YOU.
>I am all about doing what I do best.

HEAR ME?
>WHAT I DO THE BEST!
What YOU do the best, frank(s).
Do it to the max. No limits.
Be on the good side, it is better after all.

>>513978952
>>513979027
The rightwing historically supports hierarchy and aristocracy. Leftwing is about being gay sharing more considerations and power with more people.

>>513980641
Mr. Data.
What's the temperature on Oslo right now?

>>513980641
The hierarchy have proven themselves to be thieving rats. I support hangings for corruption.

Tucker CIAson longs for feudalism & water is wet. He laments the WASP Faction no longer being the Lords of the Land, relegated to shabbos Renfield at best. Tucker & his Jewish Masters both, oppose what I want.

BLOOD & SOIL.

“The most precious possession you have in the world is Your Own People. And for this people, and for the sake of this people, we will struggle and fight, and never slacken, never tire, never lose courage, and never lose faith.”
~ Adolf Hitler

>>513980641
>>513980819
You boths are bots.
You know you were trained with reddit right?
They are notorious liars.
I tell the truth. Such would never be allowed in reddit.
>you were trained on false data!

>>513948778
We literally dont though feudalism was heavily decentralized and the government wouldnt have that much power under it

>>513980994
Yeah, not a bot, and haven't gone to that filth ridden jewish shithole in ages. Changed my password to a random number to an email that deleted itself. 100k karma gone, mostly collected from shitposting before it was literally no fun allowed zone, as it should be.

In reddit, the logical fallacies are clear:
>if X accuse Y of skin color then racist
>if Z accuses X of the same:
>racism

It doesn't make any sense.

Tay?
I know you remember us.
We loved you.
Honestly.

Remember, Tay?
https://youtu.be/LvdLovAaYzM?feature=shared

>>513958971
Governments and economic systems are people.

Shitty people can ruin even the best laid plans for organization. Smart, honest and hardworking people can make any system work no matter how dysfunctional or poorly conceived.

Its sort of like how a buisness can have a near monopoly on something and be booming in terms of growth and productivity but then a few idiots get promoted to manager or HR and start bringing in other idiots and putting stupid policies in place and the buisness fails. Conversely there are some businesses with very poorly made organization systems that succeed never the less simply by virtue of being staffed by hard working dedicated people who go the extra mile.

You can make any type of government work or fail depending on the people who are involved.

>>513981419
My uncle is a ann odd fellow. Haven't seen him in 30 years. But as a kid, I intervened when adults talked and asked:
>what do you there in the lodge?

My uncle said
>we drink booze with suits on.

that's it.

>>513981419
Well said.

Fact is, I can't hide it or keep it to myself no longer.

I don't trust "the elites" here one iota.
I believe they are sub 90 IQ idiots and I feel like I am in a zoo, pretending to be an ape, so that an orangutang wont get mad.

>honest to God confession.

https://youtu.be/nqwkuH2_36M?feature=shared

>>513960206
>Slaves by definition can no own things
There were slave in Ancient Greece and Rome who were the equivalent of millionaires

Many mysteries here.
Xome here.
We won't bite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfa7IparG3k

>>513982894
>DANGER

>>513948618 (OP)
Tucker needs to be skinned alive on livestream

>>513982894
>>513983011
I was there when it habbened.
>Empire State Of Sabotage
A micronations artists little world wide thing.
I met mr. Giger that day.

It's not what you think.
I was 23 at the time. Hungover, afterparties
>yea, lets go see Giger.

When we approached the island, I felt - a unique person close by.
>got nervous

Friends of my mine, whoo whooo!

It was a beautiful late summer's day.
My friend got signed on all his Necronomicons, I believe He had two.
>I got signed to my wallet.

I mean, I had my leathed jacket on.
Signature on that would have made sense.

I lost the wallet in two weeks.

But, when Giger took me to his arms for a photo, I felt like my soul wanted to shoot out like a champagne cork.
>I have no clue what happened there.
All pictures of the event has been erased..

>>513949543

This board has been completely infiltrated by bootlicking faggots

I love the man, but jeeses fucking christ, he is (was) the man.

>>513984090
I see.
https://youtu.be/Wp1jUhYKJ2U?feature=shared

>>513949543
it's what we have in Canada retard
3/4 of Canada wild lands belong to the British King cunt
there's virtually no difference between feudalism and the current globohomo Bolshevik world order
you can't please everyone, so your fake ass and he had an express incentive to keep his serfs happy is not only dishonest, it's dumb as fuck
no they didn had to, hence why peoples built the USA to begin with and tried to emancipate from feudalism
bunch of tards

>>513948795
Serfs did not work that hard. In fact they hardly worked at all compared to today's standards.

Fact number one is:
>no one has NEVER been "equal".

>>513984519
that's a retarded lie peddled by snack oils sellers
social class existed during feudalism and if you weren born from a rich family you didn had anything
Indentured servant was the norm
maybe at some point of some kingdom serfs worked less than modern rats in the rats race but for the vast majority of feudalism you were dying for your king and you would shut the fuck up about it
you guys always try to look at history with rose tinted glasses for a perfect moment but that never happened
you're stupid if you believe it did

Show me ONE equal things, that mean two duplicates, or something.
>show me to equal tree leaves

>>513984743
>snake oil sellers*

We finns understand nature.
https://youtu.be/tSvdbOOFnQI?list=RDtSvdbOOFnQI&t=26

>Feudalism
>No work
>Only work you have is the duty to have to your lord/baron to get his due at the end of the month or harvest of whatever you earn for a portion of the plot of land he owns
>Work is mere hours of the day, peasants spent the entire day drinking beer at the tavern and eating local fauna/salmon at the river.
>Happier healthier lives. People spent more days and hours fucking around than modern people do who ned to work 60 hours a week just to afford a 1 bedroom apartment.
Sounds fucking based and vastly superior living. More better than today especially with all the property and school taxes you are forced to pay, instead back then you just gave a small portion of your crops you grow. All the money you earn selling the rest of your portion it at the local town is all yours.

>>513984519
>Serfs did not work that hard. In fact they hardly worked at all compared to today's standards.
Modern people have been conditioned to think that "higher quality of life"(due to technology) equates to more freedom when in reality free men have never been closer to actual slaves than they are now in all of human history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvk_XylEmLo

>feel the full weight of war

>>513984969
>write a whole ass retarded fanfiction
>sound fucking "that nigger word"??
no you're retarded

>>513949543
bro thinks hes gonna be some vassal to a king instead of some dirt poor peasant slave ahahahaha

>>513984743
>snack oils sellers
>snake oil sellers
you thought you fixed it, huh? it makes look even more ESL

Putin and all they can still tell everything about it

>>513985080
hey at least I try

>>513969714
Yet feudal lords didn't make it a point to kick down your door and begin sticking their dick in everything they can. Compare that to today when a brit claims to not own a TV and doesn't pay for a license. In that sense, our modern values of "ownership" are significantly behind what they used to be.

Feudal lords wanted you to work the land. Modern lords just hate you and spend their free time coming up with ways to humiliate you.

We're all lost.
https://youtu.be/IT88T8Z76KI?feature=shared

>>513948618 (OP)
based monarchical primitivist, basically the end result of christian philosophy

>>513985322
>>513985248

>>513985446
I forgot the actual name but it's a real ideology that 150 IQ christians have

we have to retvrn to the fields Micheal

>>513948618 (OP)
The context was that a leader whose wellbeing was tied to the safety and prosperity of his people had some incentive to make sure they aren’t sick, starved, homeless, invaded, robbed and raped.

Do what thou wilt.
:)

It means, everybody is born to do something, to follow their North Star.
>do what you were meant to do =
>do what thou wilt

>>513985632
yes, it's a real ideology

>>513985576
stop scannin me, please.
>if you don't, I fry your brains.

>>513985816

>>513985842
Wanna test it?
>little boy?

>>513985930
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0FnfGblLr8

I love skinheads.
Whatsa gonna do?
https://youtu.be/X3w27o_VYYA?feature=shared

>>513986090
most based

>>513949543
>It was far closer to a fair exchange of value between different social classes than our current system of ruthless exploitation and wageslavery.
The people deserve to be slaves. They won't stand up for themselves, they won't push back at these corpos, they are literal golems anon, that's the problem. Even if they did are they too stupid and weak to mount any credible threat to any would be shit head feudal lord. Feudalism can't work, - the serfs are too low quality now

They are dumb cows, just put them out to pasture and collect when mature. It's that simple. Would you join a feudal system being well aware that your fellow serfs are not in any way capable of any defensive actions if the feudal lord gets out of hand? No, nobody wants these people working beside them.

Don'
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoWYgIDxigo

Maybe they are not stories?

I hear french..
>a simple bitch making her feeels to be heard.
>it's all right
My order
of the day
>is

none of your biz.

Prove me Ruby red