← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 513964667

21 posts 8 images 18 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: /xAwzFFh) Germany No.513964667 >>513964933 >>513965126 >>513965628 >>513966121 >>513966286 >>513966358 >>513966560 >>513967119
Extremely long sentences need to be handed down
To dating app operators, apple and google for allowing them on the app store, politicians for not banning them and women for using them. Discuss.
Anonymous (ID: 7k2o+9qH) United States No.513964933 >>513967143
>>513964667 (OP)
If you have a problem with dating apps it's because your face is too ugly to match with anybody but landwhales and I know that because that's my exact experience too. Getting rid of them wouldn't suddenly change dating dynamics though, people would start "sliding into DMs" more on other sites and be judged by their appearance just the same.
Anonymous (ID: oVMU5BI4) Mexico No.513965079 >>513965855 >>513968130
Dating apps are literally created to keep you single, because if they managed to create a long lasting relationship they'd lose two customers
Anonymous (ID: 0kfbfOMa) United States No.513965126
>>513964667 (OP)
never used one
never will
no app on my phone accesses cellular network without asking me first
Anonymous (ID: WftV6m1D) United States No.513965324
I sincerely doubt this woman didn’t fuck at least 1 of those 72 men unless the story is fake which it is
Fucking Reddit and Twitter posts is all this board is
Anonymous (ID: 9oAFkdCh) Germany No.513965628 >>513966027 >>513966121 >>513966269
>>513964667 (OP)
>1/3 were missing at least one check box on her list of must haves (most commonly "not tall
i want to see her list
Anonymous (ID: 9xyypjbZ) United States No.513965855 >>513966258
>>513965079
much like doctors. hey maybe those fields have something common...
Anonymous (ID: rCF5gzTb) United States No.513966027 >>513966247
>>513965628
>i want to see her list
OP for some reason left that out with this bait
https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/1mzcw60/girl_in_our_group_has_dated_exactly_72_men_from/
>Current #1 prospect is a 6'6" principal level engineer who works in solar and battery tech, who she met off the apps
Anonymous (ID: OkzD3bOp) Mexico No.513966121 >>513967258
>>513964667 (OP)
not tall
second part, not RICH
third part, no "qualifications"
fourth part, they had hobbies

fucking shit bitch, she's on her way to becoming a furmom
>>513965628
187cm or taller
makes 300000 usd a year or more
has more than 2 phd's
likes to travel
is empathing and enjoys life
no ex wife, no children
no baldies, no chonks, no glasses, no unfull beard (which he must shave every day anyways)
dresses "well" (whatever she thinks that is, may change any moment)
has a cock at least 21cm long and 18cm diameter
owns property, cars
has friends but doesn't ever see them
no videogames
no gambling
no hobbies
is a gourmand
allows her her own time to know herself
doesn't get jealous of her, or disturbed about her past
Anonymous (ID: OkzD3bOp) Mexico No.513966247
>>513966027
tsk tsk tsk
ENGINEER?
electrical?
pfff, NERD!
next!
Anonymous (ID: oVMU5BI4) Mexico No.513966258
>>513965855
>much like doctors
Only in countries with for-profit healthcare
Pharmaceuticals though...
Anonymous (ID: JTK8zI2i) United States No.513966269
>>513965628
Girlboss certainly had "makes less than me" as an item if she's a midget 5'2" and demanding tall guys.
Anonymous (ID: hL/SzSLI) United States No.513966286 >>513966365 >>513966785
>>513964667 (OP)
>0/72 fucked
Yeah right. That’s cap
Anonymous (ID: 8+r1rLsN) No.513966358
>>513964667 (OP)
Not their fault women are insane
Anonymous (ID: 7JU5YIGG) United States No.513966365
>>513966286
The entire thing is ragebait.
Anonymous (ID: uDlpCRXD) United States No.513966560
>>513964667 (OP)
>girlboss
This was all one large power trip exercise, wasn't it?
Anonymous (ID: rCF5gzTb) United States No.513966785
>>513966286
No cap bussin uce stop aura farming
Anonymous (ID: yHEI62vR) United Kingdom No.513967119
>>513964667 (OP)
based woman
Anonymous (ID: aktNC8MT) United States No.513967143
>>513964933
Used to all you needed was a bag of weed now its legal everywhere i dunno how you get would get them over to your house mabye it still works on the young brokes ones I haven't been on a dating app since covid I didnt ever take them on dates they would just come to my house and we do the old smoke and poke
Anonymous (ID: bCKxAzMv) United States No.513967258
>>513966121
I hope she's a virgin ... Only the pure may approach the unicorn she's looking for.
Anonymous (ID: qj/gCVJw) United States No.513968130
>>513965079
Sort of. The apps don’t exist to get people together. That’s not to say they’re designed to keep you single. Their actual design purpose is to create a validation app for women and a sort of wishing well for men.

OP’s pic is an anomaly. 72 men in a five month period and living in the same area finding someone to date wouldn’t normally happen. There was just an extremely slutty girl involved. Generally, girls on these apps don’t date anyone.

Take a step back and design your own app. What would it look like? What rules would it involve to make sure people weren’t just using it to get an ego boost and were actually trying to start a relationship?

Grindr is unironically the best dating app in terms of UI. Oddly enough, Sniffies (an even more gay app, designed around “cruising,” aka gay butt sex with total strangers) is a close second.

If you used the Grinder UI, some kind of AI algorithm that paired people with their looks match, and had rules in place such as no machine-gun messaging from men, an even male-female ratio, and booted unused profiles, then no women would ever use that app.