Thread 513990725

In one week, Texas Senate Bill 20 (S.B. 20), also known as the "Stopping AI-Generated Child Pornography Act," will be enacted. Which basically means Texans will no longer be allowed to own, create, possess or distribute any kind of material that contains lewd depictions of fictional characters under the age of 18.

This also means that pretty much most anime/manga as well as many Japanese games are now illegal and subject to a minimum of two years in prison and possibly a fine of at least $10,000.

How are you holding, Texans? Browsing 4chan is now illegal for you. So much for that First Amendment, right?

Unenforceable hogwash.

nothing will happen

>>513990958
Why do you say that, Anon? You don't think Texas isn't going to arrest people?

Hags won.

>>513990958
>>513991088
I don't understand why chuds keep voting for horrible policies and then justify it with "okay but it won't be enforced so it's okay."
What's the fucking point then?

>only state in america where its illegal to boycott israel, somehow outjewing jew york and jewyfornia
what makes the based texas conservative like this?

>>513990958
>>513990725 (OP)
The law will be struck down

It's 1st amendment protected speech as determined by SCOTUS almost 30 years ago.
They ruled that pixels do not have an she if consent and therefore do not institute child porn

All you have to do is maintain of your case, do not take plea deals like your kike lawyer will advise you to, and speak to higher courts

First thing you do is file a motion to dismiss based on 1a

>>513991715
It's not that shrimple, Anon.

ITT: Californians take this anonymous opportunity to shit on some other state for once

>>513990725 (OP)
>>513991715
>>513992215
The crux of it is the obscenity aspect, intended to do an end-run around the PROTECT act getting struck down for being overbroad (and done at the state level). Still unconstitutionally vague miller test style bullshit that arguably applies to all porn, but it hasn't been properly challenged at the supreme court level because of the plea deals you mentioned.

Meanwhile, what ever happened with that texas lawsuit against netflix over "cuties"?

>>513993017
>>513992215
I might be in a different timeline, there was a SCOTUS case from the 90s or 2001 that said something about anime porn not being real and therefore isn't cp

The protect act talks about identifiable children, is Loli anzu identifiable? What's her address so we can subpoena her to make a statement about her age at the time the image was created!

>>513990958
Never underestimate anarcho-tyranny

>>513993298
You know this very same supreme court overturned multiple past SCOTUS cases? Probably the most in history actually. What makes you think lolicon is the one time they won't ignore the constitution?

You could also just not jack off to kids. Have you considered that?

>>513993384
Never underestimate the anarcho tranny!

>>513993512
Are the kids in the room right now?

>>513993448
What make you think I'm going to continue playing the hokey-pokey with them?

I'll jack it to whatever I want and I'll kill anyone that tries to stop me.
They aren't an authority anymore, nobody is after covid

>>513991127
Why is loli Ui wearing a uniform, anyway? Most elementary school kids in Japan don't.

>>513993298
Federally speaking, USC 2256 (CP law) explicitly excludes drawings, sculptures, cartoons, etc from being considered CP. However, USC 1466A (obscenity law) has nearly identical wording but has no such exemption. It also includes a line that basically says it's not required for the victim to "actually exist" which is poorly worded because it can be interpreted one of two ways:
>it applies to fictional characters, or
>it means you don't have to find an actual identifiable minor to bring charges

Also the miller test means loli/shota is legal by default unless/until a jury applies (also very poorly defined) "contemporary community standards" (no indication of which community or which standards, which, good luck figuring that out in an internet context) decides a particular piece or set of pieces isn't, which means it's in a gray area where it's impossible to predict what would or wouldn't survive scrutiny, hence it being unconstitutionally vague.

All of the above is why people conflate CP with loli/shota and why there's endless arguing about whether it's protected speech or equivalent to CP. Legally speaking, it's Schrodinger's obscenity. As for why "obscenity" isn't considered protected in the first place, ask the boomers who somehow read that into the text of the first amendment.

As for the texas state law, it hinges on similar wording, but the way the act modified the law was so convoluted that I'm not entirely sure what the current texas law now is.

>>513990958
That's the point. You get arrested for criticizing the government, not possessing lolicon.

Also it says "appears" which has zero definition.

So exactly why aren't there massive freakouts amongst weeaboos right now? You guys seem so confident about this not being enforced. It's only a matter of time before they round up all lolicons and throw 'em in the slammer.

>>513994208
The wording of the law is what's dangerous. Basically any erotic character under 18 is now CP. Bikini chick from Gurren Lagann? CP.

She's short and slender? Age isn't stated? She even has wide hips? CP

>>513993958
>contemporary community standards" (no indication of which community or which standards, which, good luck figuring that out in an internet context)
Well Brandenburg vs Ohio says that all speech is protected unless it causes an immediate evil
What an evil is is undefined, some jurrors would call spilling your seed an evil but their opinions are irrelevant because of separation of church and state
Since no real person is harmed, these drawings are surely protect speech


>Legally speaking, it's Schrodinger's obscenity. As for why "obscenity" isn't considered protected in the first place, ask the boomers
Boomers and silent thought they got the keys to reality and could just remind our country until whatever schizo christcuck delusion they could think of.
We're going to be retroactively repealing every law since 1863

>>513994469
Ftfy

>>513993512
>kids
it's an image, not an actual kid

Could this feasibly spread to all hentai?
what is the endgame? This won't help the plummetting birth rates when everything is still expensive.

>>513994491
I agree conceptually, but in regard to "which community and which standards?" I was thinking in more practical terms, e.g.
>the physical community/jurisdiction where the court case is being heard?
>the physical community/jurisdiction where the alleged offense was committed?
>the virtual community where it was committed?
>the physical community/jurisdiction where the site's servers are located? What if there are multiple server farms?
>the physical community/jurisdiction where one or more people accessed the content?
>the physical community/jurisdiction where the ISP(s) involved are located? Which one(s)?
>what if it was posted to a foreign website?

Assuming they can figure out which one(s) of the above apply, then, which standards? Selected by whom? What if the standards conflict with each other (e.g. it's abhorrent to post loli/shota in one community but normal in another)? Physical community or virtual community? What if two different communities evaluate the same piece of art in different ways (this would have to be permitted or else one community would effectively decide standards for another community)?

It just seems like a problem that can't be solved in a practical or reliable or repeatable way, let alone a fair one. Which, along with there not being an "obscenity" carveout in the first amendment, is why obscenity law should be thrown out as unconstitutional.

>Brandenburg vs Ohio
That's used to apply to inflammatory speech, not to obscenity.

>>513990725 (OP)
it will be used to incriminate anyone with anime pfps shit-talking the govt on social media, won't it?

>>513990725 (OP)
>wahhh I can’t masturbate to drawings of kids
Kys

>>513990725 (OP)
I love Indiana where we can have guns and loli.

>>513991520
Wtf is an ultra orthodox kek

>>513995000
An image of what?

>>513990725 (OP)
who's the authority on aging fictional characters?

>>513995433
Except the law bans much more than "drawings of kids."

>>513995189
>will the moral busybody censors stop trying to ban things?
They will never stop. They need to maintain clout, which means they will always look for something to go after. Any hentai that any karen could claim is loli/shota can and will (and in some ways already has been) affected, if for no other reason than lawyers for websites advising those sites to err on the side of caution. As evidence, look at collective shout's accusations about content on Steam and their calling Grok's Ani "childlike" despite her being tall and busty and intended to be an adult character.

And that's before you consider the chilling effect it will have on artists who will second-guess and self-censor their work out of fear. That's damage we'll never see because those aritsts will avoid drawing it to begin with.

>>513995527
A drawing of a thing is not the same thing as the actual thing and even if it was, it's a drawing of a fictional character, so your attempted (and very tired, NPC-tier) "gotcha" is retarded at best

>>513995589
Given the way facial scan laws are going, apparently AI is going to decide how old people/characters are based on how they look, which is a ludicrous standard to begin with, especially with the neotenous stylization commonly found in cartoons and anime.

>>513995620
>some dumbass woman on Twitter is the law
You’re retarded. Police and prosecutors aren’t filing charges if they see that on your computer. Weebs are masturbating to drawings of toddlers and prepubescent kids. It’s very obvious when you see it.

>>513995189
The goal is to make everything illegal and then only arrest people they dont like. But maybe it will get someone to moderate anyway, Im tired of going to Imagefap and wondering if the wave of AI slop is going to get me in trouble

>>513995820
1. That has no victim any more than shooting people in call of duty
>It's obvious when you see it
Ahh I love laws that ban whatever someone feels like.

Make sure to ban porn with flat chested women, because that stimulates pedophiles!

Is jacking off to Marie Kondo pedophilic? She's 50

>>513995743
It’s not a “gotcha”. If someone is masturbating to depictions of kids they are pedophiles. The kid being real or not doesn’t change the paraphilia. And no, they aren’t attracted to le pixels/drawing because you don’t see them masturbating to pixels of trees. They masturbate to pixels that look like kids.

>>513995820
Forgot link
>adult women banned from doing porn, because it "stimulates pedophiles"
https://theweek.com/articles/497091/australias-small-breast-ban

>>513995944
Answer if jacking off to Marie Kondo should be banned. She's 50. >>513995932

>>513995862
>banning drawn child porn is a heckin slippery slope!!
>they’re going to ban drinking water next!
Pedophile IQ

>>513993298
>I might be in a different timeline, there was a SCOTUS case from the 90s or 2001 that said something about anime porn not being real and therefore isn't cp

No, I remember my high school US Government teacher telling us about that in 2008/2009. I'm from that timeline. It's too bad neither of us is in the timeline where SCOTUS rulings or the Constitution matter anymore, though.

>>513990725 (OP)
Good hopefully every state follows suit

>>513990958
Idk about that. It's almost like the making certain or all guns illegal thing. Yeah there's a ton of it already out there and floating around but it's gonna be a lot harder for people to procure it from here out and slowly cops will wind up in these people's cars and homes on unrelated calls and find the stuff and pressure them to hand in other people who share their interest in it and what would have been a traffic ticket will turn into prison sentences and going on a list for the rest of your life. I don't agree with this and think it's wrong but that's how I see it playing out of the law stands

>>513995200
It replaced tamerelio vs Chicago, sure
But s the current standard for what is protected speech

Just because roasties and purstins get their panties in a bunch over a cartoon, doesn't suddenly make the cartoon outrageous.
If they're so sensitive, then they are the fucking problem

>>513996440
Why don’t you show the cartoons of children being raped to your friends and family? Let me know what they think.

>>513990725 (OP)
Will cartoon loli fappers have to register as sex offenders?

The AI stuff is pretty gross. It's just an anime face slapped onto a photorealistic body.
That's not really in the same category as something like Prisma Illya.

>>513993958
you are literally retarded. Only the 'indistinguishable' part doesn't apply to does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.
Also not a single lawyer anywhere is going to defend perverted ass loli/shota fags ever

>>513991520
>what makes the based texas conservative like this?
the dispensationalist heresy, they are all going to hell by the by, for they ain't even capable of fathoming that they have done something they have to repent from

>>513990725 (OP)
Texas has been a faggot feminized liberal shit hole for years now. They'll start enacting greater restrictions on guns by 2027 and it'll be the next California by the end of the decade. Screenshot this post.

>>513996005
A little aggressive. I think its fine they want to ban it. But its the same with like weed, its legal until they want to arrest you federally. P Diddy and Cosby had their charges dropped because theyre special. Special rules for special people.

>>513993512

I don't do that anymore. The last time I did that was 2013.

I just like looking at the pics. It puts a smile on my young 40 year old face.

If they really wanted to protect children they would ban muslims.

>>513990725 (OP)
Land of the not so free anymore.

>>513995944
>depictions of kids
You need to separate the concept of real kids from the concept of fictional kids. They're two different notions. Fictional children don't exist, can't be harmed, have no permanence, have no rights, and are not protected by law (other than maybe intellectual property law).

Equating real children to fictional children is a very dangerous mindset because will result in hysterics around the subject desensitizing people to it, just like we saw with racism, homosexuality, nazism, etc. Being accused of those things used to end someone's social life, job prospects, etc. but now nobody cares, even if the accusation is true. Don't desensitize people to the accusation of pedophilia, it's dangerous for children in the long term.

But okay, for the sake of argument, let's pretend that doesn't matter (and it very much does). What's your point? Child abuse/exploitation is illegal (and should be), but pedophilia on its own is not. How does that conversation go, in your mind?
>"a depiction of what?"
>"a child"
>"AH-HA I gotcha! You're a pedophile!"
>nothing happens

>>513996440
Everything I'm reading says the miller test is still in use today with regard to obscenity specifically, and this lines up with the wording of obscenity laws currently on the books, all of which (that I've seen) are effectively just some slight rewording of the miller test. Am I missing something?

>>513996547
Same reason I don't show them my sissy bdsm or run around town in a gimp suit
Dumbass

>>513990725 (OP)
Arrest these people gawking at this nude fictional character under age 18!

>>513990725 (OP)
so I can't go on /b/ now? I hate this fucking shithole. not that I ever clicked on those threads, now I have to be extra careful.

Fuck off.

>>513997199
real pizza is legal in India, you don't see them telling them shit.

privacy minded individualists vrs collectivists. I sure hope pol is on the correct side

>>513990725 (OP)
Trump will veto it to protect himself and Israelies

>>513997243
Pedophilia should be illegal you faggot. No sane society should tolerate pedophiles. Allowing them to draw and spread child rape cartoons because it’s just a drawing is fucking braindead lolbert shit. And calling someone a pedophile who masturbates to drawings of kids being raped doesn’t “desensitize” people to the word. Only pedophiles think this. Everyone else just sees it as the correct application of the label.

>>513997261
You will get very different outcomes. Normal people will talk with friends about women they find hot. You can’t even do that because you find cartoon kids hot.

>>513997243
All of that makes sense but what you don't understand is that women hate beauty and competition and even fiction girls are perceived as a threat to them. That's why every woman in America suddenly hates Sydney Sweeney for being hot in an American Eagle ad.

this will be used to police everything anyone does online. its the final trap to total techno-dystopia.

I've posted before about how so many of US' ills were completely self-inflicted, from their:

1. Draconian anti-terrorism surveillance laws and immigrant problem as the result of waging illegal and massively destabilizing wars overseas

2. Inflated cost of living as the result of no longer being able to exploit global south countries with predatory economic policies, having not used their massive exploitative profits thus far to invest in industrial, non-financial sectors, nor the wellbeing of its own citizens but instead siphoned off through Reaganomics into the evil upper crust

3. Posturing against China in favour of Japan for 80 years when China had only ever been on the receiving end of American violence since the 1800 US warships-on-the-Yangtze gunboat diplomacy era, had always held ambivalent to favourable views towards Americans until America took deliberate actions to spy on and hamstring their economy. Then for Japanese porn culture that the US/jewish elite first introduced to Japan in order to destabilize that country then come back around and reinfect the US - ironic, wouldn't you say. And the shallow materialism and lookism introduced to South Korea is undergoing a similar metamorphosis and is currently repollinating the west.

There are so many other examples. Nearly all of it can be boiled down to colonialism or neocolonialism. The irresponsible interference of foreign affairs without understanding cultural interdependence or downstream effects of interference. And capitalism too of course.

Based, fuck pedos. Enjoy Cell Block One!

>>513990725 (OP)
Where can you report people? I want to get all of the mods and top posters on Funnyjunk vanned

>>513990958
They arrested a comic book store owner years ago for selling an adult an adult comic from the adults only section on the basis that it 'proved' he was targeting kids with obscene content. The full sentence was eventually suspended after public pressure, but he still spent months in jail.

Don't doubt Texas' ability to outretard itself.

>>513997712
Most child fuckers are Alcoholics which is reason enough to start jailing those too

>>513993298
Iowa State Supreme Court ruled in Handley that Protect was overly broad, but they still pressured the guy to plead out to obscenity charges so the DA could save face.

>>513994208
You posted an adult woman with a fat ass.

>>513995620
>Prepubescent
>Big perfect tits
Did she forget what puberty is?

>>513997712
>Pedophilia should be illegal you faggot. No sane society should tolerate pedophiles

So uh... when are you going to arrest your president, 70% of senate, congress, industry leaders, top wealth holders, and academia. Let me guess... never. Because your crusade against pedophilia has always been hollow, a tool used to attack those you don't like in favour of real practicing child molestors.

Which brings me to my next point. Pedophilia and child molestation are distinctive things . Arrest child molestors and criminalize child molestation sure, it's actually an achievable goal. Trying to criminalize pedophilia is not possible. It's like trying to criminalize getting wet. It's a naturally arising sexual orientation that's ingrained in genetics and psychology.

>>513998289
Anon, come on now. You should know at this point that "pedophile" just means "women younger and prettier than me."

>>513997712
>>513998391
>should be illegal
It's commonly accepted that what someone is attracted to is an immutable trait. Whether that's true or not I don't know, but enough people believe it's true that if you were to try to outlaw an immutable trait, there's a a decent chance it would be overturned in court and cause pedophiles to be added to the list of protected classes of people, just like homosexuals. A lot of that would depend on which districts the case/appeals happen in, but it would be very interesting legal theater regardless.

>calling people nazis doesn't desensitize people to the word.
Good luck with that logic

>>513997788
True

>>513998289
This type of accusation is usually ultimately based on neotenous facial features, like the big eyes. Cute anime girls all sort of look like kittens so grumpy old karens ignore the rest of the body when evaluating age.

Post the diaper fag arrest video.

>>513998391
As soon as you show some evidence beyond he was in a picture with a pedo that died in prison. Also, we can criminalize drawn CP the same way we criminalize regular CP (which is also just pixels).

>>513998563
You live in a fucking fantasy. Nobody is going to turn pedophiles into a protected class bc they would be killed if they tried.

>>513990725 (OP)

So the entire Senran Kagura franchise is now illegal in Texas?
Is Steam gonna have to block purchases from Texas IPs?

Come and take it then.

>>513998903
>Also, we can criminalize drawn CP the same way we criminalize regular CP (which is also just pixels).
go for it

>>513990958
Trump wants to arrest people for burning the israeli flag

>>513990725 (OP)
Texas copying California? Interesting strategy.

>>513990958
It's already happening.
https://www.kcra.com/article/darrin-bell-cartoonist-arrested-child-porn-sacramento/63444918

who deleted it
what

>>513999426
that got deleted lmao

Fate/Grand Order will be illegal in Texas come September, due to character designs such as this.

>>513999105
Literally none of them are loli nor mistakable as such, in fact nobody in the series is at all as far as I recall. The whole point of it is massive tits, they've even had interviews with the creator and he just obsessively goes on about how he focuses on big tits. I can't think of a single character without huge tits.

>pseudo CP is now banned
Why is this a problem again?

>>513995932
There is not enough semen in the world for the amount I want to put in that woman.

>>514000002
They're canonically mostly 16. Go reread that law, retard. It's illegal in Texas next week. Titty size has nothing to do with it.

>>514000002
I'm sorry bro, but Mirai is a real character. Picrel is official art.

>>513995527
pixels

>>514000286
Okay? They already do the "in the US version she's 18" trick for almost every release of hentai or hentai related games as it is. What then, faggot?

>>514000287
Yeah, forgot about her in the sea of massive bazongas.

>>514000286
It also doesn't have nothing to do with it, you meant re-read the OP probably, the actual law states a lot about how they are also including characters that 'appear' under 18. Tits are a big factor in that aspect of it. :) I forgot to say in my prior reply because you're so fucking faggy and niggerish.

>>513991271
It's evangelicals, not hags. They have been the fun police since 2 Live Crew

>>513990725 (OP)
Based Texas

>>514000832
>>513991271
These are the people you wanted in charge to own the libs. Cry I guess. I guess Weeaboos arent getting away with the lxli being an 800 vampire alien dragon reincarnation this time

Oh NO not the hecking ironic lolicons

>>514001196
Thin end of the wedge. The things you like are on the chopping block, too, just not yet.

>>513990725 (OP)
AI generated? That's slave labor today. How on earth do you think that's a good thing?

>>514001840
Oh fuck you must be underage to say something like that

>>513997815
Retards never learn
>Target porn because difficult to defend without shame
>laugh about it
>kikes redefine and extend reach
>cry a river

>>513990725 (OP)
RIP texas cucks
Child shaped sex dolls are legal in my state

>>514000118
You give an inch, and they'll demand a mile. It never ends, they will go after other things.

>>514001092
>I guess Weeaboos arent getting away with the lxli being an 800 vampire alien dragon reincarnation
Anyone who wouldn't shoot a fed for their waifu shouldn't even be on this site. Go back to zuckbook.
>anime board
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELN02XA2mSI

pajeets lost indiachan in the spring of 2023 because it drew unwanted attention as a cp swap meet. they have since replaced it with bharatchan, but former indiachan enjoyers don't find enough of what they want there

>>513990725 (OP)
Based. Every time you post loli a texmex faggot gets swatted and shot.

cp is legal in india

pajeets have been transplanted all over the world in unbelievable numbers. the plan is to homogenize all countries into a single mass of interchangeable, predictable, suggestible consumers whose only loyalty is to the elite and their system of puppetry. motivated not by heritage or ideology (despite all portrayals to the contrary), but by paltry shares of wealth and status in a materialistic world order in which everyone belongs equally everywhere and nowhere

pajeets should be posting on bharatchan and living on the subcontinent

>>513990725 (OP)
>Ban AI generated images
How far are the Texas Boomers stretching the definition of "AI generated"?

learn to recognize pajeet threads. learn to stop giving (You)s, which end up as rupees, to OPs like this. jews pay pajeets to spam this board en masse with the same globohomo agenda that you're still associating with only jews. since 2023 you are much more likely to see jew noise posted by a pajeet. there are a hundred times as many pajeets as there are jews. if you want any part of the internet to survive, you must detect, reject and redeem pajeets everywhere you find them

>>513990725 (OP)
Are you fucking retarded?
Is this entire website retarded?
Do you not know that all of that was already banned in Texas a long time ago? It's just to add AI generated images to an already long laundry list of shit you can't have, and that's it. The law doesn't ban anime or video games.

Stupid fucking board.

>>514002685
>Do you not know that all of that was already banned in Texas a long time ago?
Generally lolicon laws go unenforced, unless they also have real CP, or they are bringing loli magazines through an airport.
>It's just to add AI generated images to an already long laundry list
Except first, AI CP is ALREADY ILLEGAL UNDER EXISTING LAWS, and the law has such a broad definition, a huge majority of anime is illegal.

>>514002783
>and the law has such a broad definition, a huge majority of anime is illegal.
No it's not, fucking moron.
When this board got filled with people too stupid to understand or study law is beyond me, but this place is a lost cause now.
All the law did was add "drawn" AI generated CP to the Texas obscenity bans. It already had hand-drawn CP banned. Now it made sure that AI is included.
It's not so broad as to include all anime and video games, and if you had half a fucking brain you'd go and reference Texas statutes on what constitutes "obscenity."
But you wont do that, because you're fucking retarded.

>>514002920
>No it's not, fucking moron.
To quote the text "underate" or "appears to be."
>this is a sexualized 14 year old
>this is illegal

>>514003006
No it's not, dumb shit. Learn how to read and interpret law. You gotta check all the other laws it references so you can get the whole picture.
The statute on obscenity will very clearly state what Texas considers it to be, and it wouldn't include Yoko Littner.

>>514003071
AI CP is *already* illegal based on the laws on the books. If an AI model is trained on images of real kids, then you tell it to make those kids naked, that's CP. It's the same as photoshopping a pic of a real kid naked.

This law gives the government broad powers to selectively enforce anti-CP laws against anyone who consumes regular anime.

>>514003175
Again. It does not. The law makes "loli" and "shota" generated by AI included in with what it considers to be "AI CP."
But as I keep repeating myself; YOU DIDN'T READ ALL OF THE APPLICABLE LAWS BECAUSE YOU'RE A LAZY, UNINTELLIGENT MORON.

>>513999611
>Do nothing illegal
>Law changes
>You now go to jail for life with a 1 million dollar bail simply because
Explain to me again how America isnt a tyrant hellscape?
If he knew it was illegal he would have either moved countries or stopped doing it. How can you arrest someone for a law thats made literally a week before and be like
>Ok fuck you, you're criminal scum now
The fuck?

>>513991415
and now you understand the talmud

based texans

>>513990958
Dunno man, looks like a lot of our laws. You can't ever hope to enforce them totally, but it's still useful to have when you need to pile some extra charges or prosecute some inconvenient small fry.

>>513998903
Can we jail anyone who posts retarded shit like this on /pol/
They're a danger to my mental health and they post on extremist websites
Anons like you should be reported, dozed, and jailed for life

>>513990725 (OP)
>you cannot jerk off to your screen because we say so obey or else... shut up jerk of to cunny ??? Controlling what ai can and cannot do... sure forcing your will or else has worked for thousands of years !

>>513999611
That's pretty crazy. I guarantee you it was anime style lolicon, and not realistic images (which have always been illegal, AI generated or not).

>>514003652
Meanwhile trump lets out Israeli politicians caught in grooming stings

>>513995000
I suppose you're the type who thinks "but I'm not hurting anyone" makes anything okay

>>514003286
Happens all the time.
>Buy AR15
>Law changes
>Become felon
It's allowed to continue because no one cares about lolicons or gun owners.

>>513996874
Based

>>514003885
California tried to entrap gun owners on purpose
>YOU NEED BULLET BUTTONS! IT'S A FELONY IF YOU DON'T!
10 years later
>YOU NEED TO REMOVE BULLET BUTTONS! IT'S A FELONY IF YOU HAVE ONE!
Fucking bullshit.

>>513997572
Source needed

lolishota maga flags when troonsisters?

>>514000118
>pseudo crime against a pseudo person
Still waiting for any victims to come forth against these scribbles

>>513998078
I could be convinced that criminalizing alcohol might be a good idea

>>513998391
Those guys don't need to be arrested they need to be executed

>>513998903
>Nobody is going to turn pedophiles into a protected class
You have far too much faith in humanity

>>513997712
People who touch kids should be executed, not given years of free board and food.

Drawings do not hurt kids, no more than call of duty causes mass shooting.

>>514004310
>criminalize alcohol
>HEY GOY YOU CAN'T ADD BAKING YEAST TO FRUIT JUICE! THAT'S A CRIME
>HEY GOY, YOU LEFT CHOPPED FRUIT IN YOUR FRIDGE TOO LONG AND IT FERMENTED? TIME FOR JAIL!

>>513992215
Kill yourself loli hater
>>513993017
>obscenity
Is and always has been fucking bullshit. It is insane there has ever been any "obscenity" laws

>>513993512
Have you considered the fact children are sexy?

>>514000118
The problem is it was never about CP in the first place. We're fighting for our right to have beliefs contrary to the bureaucratic elite, not to be degenerates

they'll just fix it with special "Texas Editions" of Anime/Manga/Video games where you'll get hilarious 4kids-tier rewrites of characters.

>>513990725 (OP)
go back to kiwifarms. Anime Loli is legal.

>>514004754
In America

>>514002247
They shouldn't be

>>513990725 (OP)
Obviously the solution is to ensure that all potentially underage looking characters must now have ample pubic hair to show that they are both of legal age and extremely fertile. It is the only way.

These threads always remind me how depressing life must be when you're such a troglodyte mongoloidal retard whose brain is incapable of compartmentalization.
Fantasy by definition is something improbable or impossible.
Now, little baby anon, I know you're afraid of separating fantasy and reality because it's a very overpowered skill to have that allows you to enjoy life without hurting people, but don't worry it's not that scary.
Trust me, you don't see people fantasizing about riding dragons and then go strap cardboard wings and tails onto a horse, and riding it around their farms with a flamethrower in their hands (as 4chan-esque as that would be).
Fantasies go in the fantasy box in your mind, and real things go in the Reality box.
It's really that simple.
But hey, if you want to enact The Minority Report IRL over digital paintings, go ahead. See where it goes, it totally TOTALLY won't backfire on you or anything.
But again, I'm sorry you can't enjoy the benefits of compartmentalization. After-all, the power of mental simulation is maybe too much for your little baby brain to handle and maybe you're just jealous but oh well. More fantasy thoughts for me that will never hurt anyone IRL.
Guess you need to level up your INT stat some more faggot ;^)

>>514004843
Why?
https://catdoll.us/product/in-stock-catdoll-42cm-baby-doll-silicone/

>>514004843
I think most simulacra of pedophilia should be legal, but the second someone touches a real kid it's immediate execution (not the gay jewish free living expenses "punishment.")

>>514003875
Wht wouldnt it be? Because he's a pedo in his brain? You're trying to police thoughts.
>is not a real person
>literally a cartoon
Is pedophilia someone who goes after kids or cartoons? If you cant see the difference you are a fucking retard and no different than someone like trigglypuff, just with different not grounded in reality triggers. I dont even like that shit because I like to keep anime a pure, non-kiked fantasy world, but I'm also not so fucking disconnected from reality that I want to throw guys in prison for cartoons. If thats your worry, you are way too sheltered, faggot.

>>514005143
Don't be a fag, little girls are made to be fucked. It's her father's right to fuck her

>>514005046

the baby one is just creepy. how baby and toddlercons justify it to themselves or others i have no idea. What could possibly be 'sexy' about it other than a sadistic power fantasy situation? Actually revolting.

>>514005208
Ohh you're Jewish.

>>513990725 (OP)
Any law anons here? Is this pic still accurate?

>>513990725 (OP)
Good. All anime enthusiasts should be executed.

>inb4 you're literally on an anime board!!11! Hurr durr

No sir. This is a political board on a Korean basket weaving website.

>>514005143
basically my view
if it looks enough like a child that an idiot in a hurry could take sanity damage equivalent to actual cp then it shouldn't be legal
if any law written to prevent this sort of thing includes cartoons bobble heads etc then it's a stupid fucking law and we need to try again

>>513990725 (OP)
Based Texas stopping the tranime pipeline 41% in its tracks.

>>514005487
some anime has artistic merit, but anything which heavily relies on loli is probably trash so should be destroyed on it being low-brow drivel if nothing else.

>>514004494
I don't think that's how it happened the last time we did that

>>514004645
Have you considered sodomizing yourself with a hacksaw?

>>514005336
This is all a waste of time and jury nullification needs to be made mandatory education for jurors. Throwing people in jail for comic books is just a way to inflate the government's prosecution numbers.

We can already see where that has gone. Trump cleans up Washington DC in under a week, because police were focused on speeding tickets and other easy to prosecute people.

>>514005612
Then you are talking about banning all ecchi and hentai, not lolicon specifically. If lolicon is illegal, then you need a reason any other number of harmful erotica is. Scat, urine, incest, rape, bondage, guro. Where is the line drawn? People are allowed to like weird or immoral art.

>>514005527
>oh no, a sexy picture
>I'm going insane!
Do normies really think like this?
>>514005675
Why are you a gay?

>>514005636
The last time we did that our government literally poisoned and murdered tens of thousands of people.

>>514005717
>Do normies really think like this?
Unironically yes. They used to think that about violent video games

>>513990725 (OP)
Good. That shit is trash and creepy. Pedos shouldn't feel comfortable.

>>514005717
well no m8 it's not a sexy picture
it's a concrete reminder that goodness and humanity are pointless lies, that the future is poisoned by our present, that the sun will consume this cursed earth before we escape and that maybe that's for the best

being exposed to actual cp isn't sexy and kinda hurts
before the feds took over moderation of b this shit would pop up now and then and yes evidence of fucked shit like child rape and actual death causes a bit of something to get knocked loose up there

>>514005166
I see you're a consoomer that chases pleasure like a mindless worm, and is incapable of understanding art beyond "it make happy brain chemicals"
If you're fine with that then go ahead, I won't be able to convince you of anything more meaningful
Maybe one day you'll sit in your bed and find life devoid of meaning, then remember conversations like this and wonder if you should have listened
Probably not

>>514005208
Don't you have a job application to fill out

>>514005715
Not immorality per say, more just trash Gatcha stuff SPECIFFICALLY Just being loli waifu bait. It's all trash with nothing to say, just consoomism for the worst types of people.

Actual pornograthy though? who gives a shit, its porn in the first place and if your an adult, i see no harm in consuming whatever gets you off. if your a sicko, you'll still be a sicko even if all erotica were banned (which would be impossible).
This is all just theatre of course. it's all in the name of a 'decent society' but really they just don't like you criticizing the narratives they spin or their Jewish masters (who are actual paedophiles btw, as are their blackmailed stooges.) Not to mention the hordes of browns around us all who give little shit about concealing not being pedos IRL, let alone online.

It's all a sick joke really and fuck whatever the 'Law says in general at this point. Whole worlds going to shit so why bother listening to the Authority when the Authority is a gang of nonces anyway.

>>514006020
People regularly spam child gore on /pol/ to this day, if anything it feels like it's more common than it used to be, I just saw a thread with a kid with his arm missing and a bloody stump earlier. But that's perfectly legal. I guess I didn't take any sanity damage from that since it's legal, right?

>>514005487
You don't understand anime I see

>>514006225
Ok so you want to ban gatcha, not lolicon.

>>513990725 (OP)
>AI generated
>stops all
Huh

>>514006265
kikes like that sort of thing. Lack of empathy in them.

>>514005717
Are you asking that as an insult or did you genuinely think my post was gay

>>514006225
Nonce Stalking

>>514006265
The recent Hit Movie, Weapons was about Children brutally murdering some old hag while being kept in the Basement and retarded normies clapped for it like it was the greatest thing ever

I unironically don't understand how retarded normies think

The only way this makes sense is if some fucking boomer hags think the only reason they're not getting husbands is that all the men are too busy jerking it off to hentai so they need to collectively punish all men

>>514005749
Okay fine I just wanna wear a trenchcoat and carry a Thompson with a bottle of moonshine in my boot

>>514005927
falsely associating fiction writers artists animators etc with people attracted to kids gives cover to pedos and creates restriction mechanisms for the control of expression
stop that
take a look at some loli art and try to find something that looks human, the adults look like toddlers and the toddlers look like funkopops
>>514006265
but we can draw a hardline under cp since it has no useful purpose after the offender has been identified
war footage not so much, there is no easy line and any attempt to draw one risks muzzling the few remaining reporters even more than they are
though yeah it's pretty bad, i don't click webms on pol anymore

>>514006265
Pornography is genuinely many orders of magnitude more dangerous than images of gore

They hate us. They will NEVER accept us. FIGHT.

i see one more video of an agonized random getting warcrimed i think i'm gonna set fire to something and sit around for the wisdom of the flames to explain what the fuck is wrong with us

>>513995000
>it's an image, not an actual kid
so is literal CP. the pictures were already taken, right? so you having them saved like you do isn't actively hurting anyone.

>>513990725 (OP)
Based. Texans don't deserve anything good because they fell for it

>>514006358
i don't really care. I have a lot of porn saved if i want a wank, including 2D stuff. Same with 'illegal' books and rare movies and so on. I think it is a very private thing, pornography, and everyone likes it but are ashamed of it too if they haven't got a screw loose, so only in rare cases like some twat sharing IRL CP with minors because he gets off to it on roblox do i feel need arresting and a shanking in prison. Everyone else just wanks, thinks the naughty thoughts, then gets on with their lives. having Big brother spy to make sure your tossing yourself to the STATE MANDATED and CORRECT form of Misty from Pokémon is bullshit invasive nonsense no one should entertain complying with.

>>513991520
Lack of foreskins

Whatever. It will get to the Supreme Court with tons of injunctions as it works its way up the district courts.. So it will be unenforced and then go down in flames 9-0 at SCOTUS.. But it will move voters away from Republicans who are too stupid to understand free speech and art vs reality.. More likely causing would be Republicans to just not vote, while screaming leftist nut jobs throw ballots. It's just more proof the United States is a collapsing empire self immolating on stupidity and emotional meltdowns.. While wisdom and reason evaporates faster than a shallow puddle of 99% isopropyl alcohol in a black dish in the Texas August sun. Pure political theater that's going to massively backfire. Especially when people point out the only reason they're doing it is because Trump and the Republicans are balled up in the Epstein/Maxwell mess. They're just distracting from their very real crimes on children.

>>514005143
>second someone touches a real kid it's immediate execution

What age though? When my grandparents got married my grandmother was 16, grandfather was 21.

Today you'd have shrieking Karens and gen Z broccoli heads calling that pedophilia and demanding my grandfather be locked up

>>514006657
its always been about desensitizing you so you have no love or compassion in your heart. Don't let them take that from you and realise your feelings of disgust or horror are correct but you also shouldnt look away if your a man and accept the cruel unedited truth of the horror...and perhaps, get righteously angry about it if you know (((Who))) is to blame.

Explain to me why anyone shouldn't give a fuck or freak out about this law if they have lolicon in their hard drive.

>>514006858
Before age of consent laws there was age of marriage laws. Casual sex with young women was a heavily criminal offense, likely execution.

>>514006939
Many anime girls with huge tits are canonically underage. Many anime girls in mainstream animes are under 18 and sexualized.

>>514006939
If the day ever comes they confiscated your hard-drive, just say it was planted evidence and show active contempt they bothered to track and arrest you for it. Why should you answer to a real-life pedo (your judge) when all you did was rub off to raven from teen titans or some such shit.

>>514007096
Apparently, the law is very vague and they don't give a shit, as the character being underage or "appearing underage" is illegal.

>>514007218
well if they can't give a shit to be oh-so specific, you should give a fuck enough to delete all your Flayn Pics imho

>>514007018
>Casual sex with young women was a heavily criminal offense, likely execution.

According to who? I hate to be a SOURCE? SOURCE? guy but what's your source for that?

>>513990725 (OP)
what will all the pedophile-liberals watch?!

>>514007129
This. Politicians criminalize lolicon while they actually fuck kids.
>>514007418
Lynching or execution is a very normal punishment for defiling young virgins. code of hammurabi?

>>514007218
*shouldnt give a fuck

>>513995527
me as a little girl

>>513995527
Marie Kondo!

>>513993958
not a lawyer, but it doesn't make sense that private obscenity would be unprotected speech. PUBLIC obscenity sure, but i can't imagine modern americans would accept banning things adults do privately just because they are obscene. saying "nigger" in front of children is not protected, but saying nigger in and of itself IS protected. i can imagine grouping lolicon with porn in general, but treating it the same as CP makes about as much sense as telling people what sexual positions they're allowed to use.

>>514006302
I've tried many times to watch it and it's cringe and makes me want to throw up and kill myself.

>>513994469
yes i know sometimes mentally ill people get their way but i don't think most people would accept that as an argument. there is a lot of astroturfing on this issue.

>>514007656
That's a really good argument against obscenity laws, except it also extends to the internet as well. Sharing lolicon on the internet is the same as sharing lolicon on public, unless it's behind private account-only websites. This also solves the problem of children stumbling on porn.

>>514003875
if it doesn't hurt anyone, then it's okay. lo T faggot.

>>514007768
What kind of anime have you been watching
There's a whole lot of different stuff

>>514007867
How about this then
When you consume pornography YOU are the victim

>>514006849
You idiot. What actually happens when states make pass new laws is that those laws become enforced until struck down by SCOTUS years or even decades later. Injunctions work against the people not the state just look at the hundreds of 2A cases in California.

>>513990958
True, but who's going to go up to bat for it and risk being called a pedo? Same reason no one touches Age of Consent laws

>>514007846
In real life people go places because they sort of have to. On the internet people go places because they choose to. It's not really all that comparable and it's why moderation exists and why browser tabs can be closed. The idea that someone seeing a single 2D loli post or something is going to ruin their life is a bit ridiculous and isn't something that needs legal enforcement.

>>514003286
this would happen a lot less if the people responsible for it caught bullets for their fuckery more often

>>514008104
Nah that doesn't work, because of fandom content. It's very easy to kids to stumble on hardcore furry porn when scrolling down on google images too much. Adult content should be isolated. It's the duty of content hosts to do it.

An ID system is bad. All you need is to lock it behind accounts.

>>514008183
better option
id system for kids for separate sanitized internet
they shouldn't be fucking on the network in the first place

TPD
I hope this gets taken to the Supreme Court and they overturn whatever previous ruling allowed this filth.

>>514008270
Sure I'm fine with that 100%. Less surveillance of the public at large, and it still makes it easier to target groomers.

>>513993746
>I'll jack it to whatever I want and I'll kill anyone that tries to stop me.
based

>>513990725 (OP)
Good.
Pedophiles should be burned alive.

>>514008183
I actually did encounter hardcore furry porn in that exact way
My hatred of furries grew over a hundredfold that day, and unlike my classmates I wasn't memed into it

>>513995502
this

>>514007768
Lol I always get asked this question. Doesn't matter what I've watched. I don't like the art style, the overexaggerated facial expressions, the sword fighting, the gasping noises and girly moans, and the lack of animation. I slightly enjoyed Death Note, Eden of the East, and Attack of Titan. I liked the movie The Place Promised in Our Early Days when I was a teen. I used to like Shin Chan a lot too. But it just really rotted my brain and makes me bored if I watch too much of it. I don't like the culture behind anime. I despise tranny weaboos.

>>514008472
It's much worse when there's discord groomers, and fandoms focused on social based stories like undertale. Lucky I stumbled on some hot krystal porn, and wasn't groomed into being a tranny by discord trannies.

>>514008183
Adult content doesn't pass through Google searches much anymore and safe search is enabled by default wihtout an account I believe. You really do have to go out of your way to find smut on the net now in all but fringe cases. This whole problem is seriously being blown out of proportion and the idea that anything at all needs to be done about it is silly. It's really nobody but the parent's responsibility in the first place anyway. Nobody is stopping them from raising their kids to be like bubble boy until they turn 18 but themselves. If they're so afraid of their kids or themsleves seeing something they consider to be icky on the net they should go join the Amish or something.

>>514004310
If it didn't work during prohibition what makes you think banning alcohol will work now?

>>514008675
>it's the parents fault
>just be amish
Opinion discarded.

>>514008755
At what point does other people dodging personal responsibility finally stop being my problem?

>>514008503
>overexaggerated facial expressions
This is a core feature of not just anime, but animation in general. You are not going to find much animation that doesn't employ exaggerated facial expressions, maybe rotoscoped stuff. Maybe Ghost in the Shell? Major Kusanagi is incredibly stone-faced.
>the sword fighting
This is a weird complaint, you'd have to go out of your way to watch anime that focus on sword fighting. You must have watched Bleach and assumed that's every anime.
>the gasping noises and girly moans
Reasonable complaint.
>lack of animation
Reasonable complaint.

>>514008846
>its the parents fault
Is the #1 Jewish argument for molesting kids!
>>514008879
Anime became a popular medium due to astro boy, because the creator found a way to make simplistic, pleasing visuals that were easy to draw.

>>513990725 (OP)
State laws do not override constitutional precedence. All non-obscene loli/shota (i.e. anything with artistic value) remains legal regardless of any laws passed, absent a constitutional amendment.

>>514007953
novel approach

>>514008879
Please recommend me an anime that isn't sword fighting, ninja fighting, big robots, or magic power fighting that doesn't take place in a school or feature a cast a schoolgirls and I might check it out.

>>513990725 (OP)
Your God-given rights are worthless when you're ruled by people who don't believe in Him and hate anyone who does

>>514008879
Anime made for children, that's why it's so immature and exaggerated.
Children don't develop a higher understanding for emotion and expression until into their late teens, even 20s. So, that's why anime is like it is.

Repetitive, very simplistic storylines, usually focused on school-aged children in places like high schools are all intended to connect with the core audience, which is to say, children.

So, isn't it about time you grew up?

>>514009081
Why would it be legal for Marie Kondo to do porn, but not legal for someone to draw her body type in porn? Is it legal if you say she's 18? (She's 40 btw)
>>514007639

>>513996617
You can get put on the same list for pissing on a tree on the side of the road.

>>513998903
Found the Israeli

>>514008503
I stopped enjoying "serious" anime years ago and now only dabble in the whimsical.

>>514009130
Steins;Gate

>>514009071
How is "Actually do your job as a parent" a pedo argument
You're just stupid

>>514008846
>NOOOOOO
>I HAVE AN UNFETTERED RIGHT TO ACCESS PORN AND IT'S EVERYONE ELSE'S RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP THEIR KIDS OUT OF IT
>LEAVE THE BILLION DOLLAR JEWISH INDUSTRY ALONE
anon, it's just tits and pussy. can't find a way to see them in real life or something?

why is it so important to you that kids have access to porn, anon?

>>514009071
Wouldn't have even bothered if I knew you were like this. You ran out of arguments so now you're just being disingenuous. But yes it is literally the parent's fault in this case, we were talking about smut on the net not child molesters. I don't know why you would think I'd blame parents for their kid being molested, absolutely ridiculous.

>>514009328
>it's the parents fault their kid looked up bluey and stumbled on gangbang scat porn!

>>514009165
I don't think you understand art

of the last four girlfriends i've had, three have been willing to do explicit pedo dirty talk
dont be fooled
people only talk about death to pedophiles so they themselves are not targeted

>>514009346
kek this. Angry jew wants to show porn to kids.

>>514008568
undertale sucked ass and i can't figure out how anyone found the effort in them to continue after the skeleton fight
and from what i can gather from the reviews and shit my reward for completing the slog would have been a shit ending and being told to do it again but in one of two worse playstyles
railroady mess so hamfisted you can actually feel the dev reach in on occasion to fuck up the game to make some sort of point because he's a hack who couldn't imagine a way to get the scene he wanted and was more willing to disrespect the player's time and his own world than actually account for player choice where it would matter
walking around the first town killed any interest the shit combat didn't
and the 'correct' ending sees unlikable manipulative murderers that absolutely deserve death rewarded for their actions
wtf was the appeal of this game

>>514009130
I already gave you one, Ghost in the Shell. In addition, Monster, Cowboy Bebop, Kaiji, Psycho-Pass, Kino's Journey, Legend of the Galactic Heroes, Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade, Perfect Blue, Planetes, Texhnolyze, Trigun. I hope that's enough to get you started.
>>514009303
Bad recc, he's going to hate it because of the cute girls.

>>514009130
Maybe say what you want, not what you don't. I thought Ride Your Wave was surprisingly mature despite having some elements of magical realism. Porco Rosso isn't different. Or Pan's Labyrinth, though that's a mix of live action and CGI or effects.

>>514009403
Most of these series is shitty garbage artificially promoted so jews can show porn to kids. If you don't like it, then it's 3deep5u.

>>514009346
kids shouldn't be on the internet
kids shouldn't have access to the internet let alone internet porn
you are a bad parent

>>514009362
The existence of rule34 and other boorus rather proves that point.

>>514009377
all women wish they were still as physically attractive as they were at [insert age here]

>>514009346
So ban 4chan
Ban Twitter
Ban fucking google images too.

Ban every website on the planet because somewhere kids might see something that influence them in anyway and it might somehow cause them harm

>>514008425
Oh no! You have been criticizing the government!
Oh noes!!! The Gov's Official Police Forces™ have "magically" found illegal material in your electronic devices!
Ohh Alas!!!! You have no way of defending yourself, you immediately have become a social pariah, and you are sentenced to be burned alive!!!
Truly Tragedy!!!

>>514009346
>why is it so important to you that kids have access to porn, anon?
Never said or implied this. Another disingenuous poster.

>>514009346
Hi I'm butting in on your conversation
It's absolutely the parents job to control what their children are exposed to, anything else is totalitarian bullshit that's pushed to take away parental control and extend government surveillance not actually to protect children
Fuck the porn industry, it should be burned to the ground and the people running it stuck on spikes in front of the Whitehouse. But I'm not letting a different enemy control me just to get rid of it.
Or the same enemy, depending on who you ask...

>>514009645
Don't give them ideas

>>514009440
I'd like to change my recc to Hellsing Ultimate.

>>514009645
>>514009346
Don't forget to ban MSpaint cause little Timmy could accidentally do this and traumatize himself.

>>514009362
It's certainly not the governments responsibility, and I'll fight against the government to keep them from trying to parent my children in my place
I will raise my children, nobody else

>>514009714
No, I think it's correct.

We should have had anti-normie internet for the past decade already, everyone got to lazy and now we have to swim amongst the retards.
Onion browsing is too slow and shit. There should be an internet where only BASED anons are allowed to use and normies can go fucking die on facebook

Tired of retards FR FR

Republicans are trying to get people to say it's not a big deal so they can jump to legalizing cunny. I'm not fucking stupid, they're trying to reverse psychology anime nerds and gamers into being contrarians.

Source: All the gay republican pedos

>>514009783
>I will raise my children by showing them furry porn
You can just say you're Jewish.

>>514009830
How the fuck did you come to that conclusion
I will raise my children by making sure I know what they're exposed to and not just let the computer be the babysitter

>>513990725 (OP)
It has been illegal, this law made it a felony and not a misdemeanor

>>514009165
Facial expressions are exaggerated in animation because depicting subtle facial emotions in a drawing is fiendishly difficult and these things are made on a limited budget. Can you express subtle emotions in a picture? Sure, a skilled painter can do that if you give him enough time. Not happening in an animation that needs tons and tons of those frames constantly. Live action you are working with real people and anyone can wear an expression on their face, that's not really a skill you have to learn.

You know how bad it is when just telling that parents should do their fucking job is labeled as le jew propaganda

>>514010100
It's really getting bad
I don't know if we're gonna make it

>>514010100
You are a naive retard that thinks you can helicopter parent your kid through the internet lmao.

>>514009789
The internet has been around since usenet in the 1980s. Little bit late to put that genie back in the bottle, anon

>>514010206
What's naive about "Just don't give them internet access except under certain conditions"

>>514009732
NO!
It's a cat's face!
The horror!

>>514010377
It makes books obsolete.

>>513991088
>>513990725 (OP)
Nothing ever happens

>>514010377
You don't even need to go that far when there are tons of premade blacklists that already exist for filtering out adult sites. Not to mention all of the already existing parental controls devices have.

>>514010465
Uh...
What does that have to do with the conversation?

>>514010546
blacklists don't protect whitelisted sites accidentally serving adult content.
>>514010599
The internet is a great learning resource, and content hosts have a duty to isolate adult content behind account walls. Adult video stores would get in big trouble if they let a kid into the store, but Google gets a pass?

>>514009081
What is the legal method to determine whether or not something has artistic value, and does that method make any sense as a legal standard?

>>514009165
Exaggeration is a core tenant of animation in general, regardless of audience. A lot of school anime is intended to evoke a nostalgic feeling in the adult audience for a period when their life didn't suck because they hadn't yet entered the world of japanese corporate drudgery, or just to give them something pleasant to look at for half an hour as a form of escapism.

>>514009362
>it's the website's fault someone found it
It is the parent's responsibility to be a parent but I'd blame the search engine sooner than I'd blame the website.

>>514009346
>bad faith argument
Replacing good parenting with the mechanisms by which you can effectively prevent such access will ultimately do more harm than good, but you aren't actually here to have a conversation

>>514009440
I've only seen a few of the items on your list but I've liked each of them and would echo your recommendations for Cowboy Bebop, Psycho Pass, and Planetes.

>>514009789
The iphone was a mistake

>>514010546
Yeah I know
I just said this instead because it's pretty darn hard to argue against physical removal of devices being an easily achievable and surefire way to keep your kids from being exposed to bad internet stuff
You'd have to be a highly committed idiot to think that doesn't work

>>514010693
>you literally need to watch over your kid's shoulder every minute they are on it!
You are a helicopter parent. Websites need to isolate adult content behind an account wall.

>>514010684
Google gets a pass not for some moral exception, but because I fucking hate the bureaucratic elite and their drive to monitor and control everything and crush us all into a grey paste to be scooped into vials and sorted like cards in a folder, burned up and discarded like fuel for their self conceited games of ideological dominion and endless hedonism
I Google gets a pass, because I don't know how to punish them in a way that even comes close to being worth the cost

>>513990725 (OP)
NO!
Those evil bastards!
I literally cannot think of anything more evil!

>>514010780
If you're a parent and you're giving your child access to a piece of technology, it's your responsibility to make sure they're qualified to operate that technology. You don't just give a kid a lawnmower and hope for the best, you show them how to operate it and keep an eye on them so you're sure they come back with all of their limbs.

If you're giving your kid access to the internet, you should coach them on what to do and what not to do, and if necessary, take advantage of the countless existing parental controls and/or monitoring/logging tools that exist at the device/OS level, within your router, etc.

Bubble-wrapping your child for 18 years and then dumping them into real life all at once will not result in a functional adult; you have to gradually acclimate them to the harsh realities of the world as they grow up. I'm not supporting being a helicopter parent, but it is nevertheless your responsibility to be a good parent.

As for the responsibilities of websites, an account wall is generally a good approach, especially for sites that primarily serve as galleries of adult content, though requiring it for any adult content anywhere would also mean 4chan couldn't operate at all so it would have to be applied sensibly and sensible middle grounds are something modern politicians don't seem to be capable of.

>>514010684
Smut being hosted long enough for innocent eyes to see it on sfw sites is a rare enough occurrence that you shouldn't have to worry about it. A proper blacklist is definitely a good enough solution to the problem. It's the best possible compromise there is without burdening site owners and having to get draconian with verification.

>>514011188
>requiring it for any adult content anywhere would also mean 4chan couldn't operate at all
Great post, but 4chan is also rare, and not the norm.
>>514011195
You don't need verification. Just "adult content must be isolated behind an account requirement."

>>513990725 (OP)
Brazilian love Shota!

>>514011188
A well measured and thoughtful take? A sense of personal responsibility? Moral principles without going to a psychotic extreme that ends up being without any morals at all?
I thought it was a myth

>>514011328
A lot of sites already do that, but to hysterical politicians it's not enough. They want verification. If it stopped at just an account requirement with the usual username email password setup, I'd actually agree. A little reluctantly but it's not the worst compromise. That with a proper blacklist? Pretty solid.

>>514011549
You don't understand the people calling the shots in the world
They don't want to protect children
They want to crush everything into identical little blocks, to tear out your brain because it's inconvenient to them. They want to glue you in place and paint a smile on you. They want you to be an obedient unthinking little cog in the machine, and when they come around and look they want you to thank them for destroying your soul

>>514011930
Yeah I'm not going to pretend an anti-lolicon, poorly worded, anarchy tyranny law is good while politicians actively fuck real kids.

looking really good hicks! pat yourselves on the backs while it lasts.

Anyone got a recommendation for a good werewolf anime?

>>514012612
Anime, no. This visual novel, however, is very good: https://store.steampowered.com/app/648100/Raging_Loop/

>>513999611
>Sergeant AMAR GANDHI
holy fuck
the jeets are in our police force now?

>>514012766
Thanks I'll check it out.
Seems just like with Hollywood there is an over representation of vampires and almost no (or literally no?) werewolves.

>>514012777
Checked.

>>514012894
Probably because vampires are sexy and pale. Werewolves are all hairy and ugly and shit.

>>514009440
I watched 5 minutes of Ghost in the Shell and it had Transformers in it. Cowboy Bebop is boring. I'll check the other ones you listed.

>>513998903
We are literally watching in real time as they slowly destroy the evidence you idiot.
Not to mention we have the testimony of (currently) living victims but they're killing them one by one too.

>I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. ... If something happens to me – in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Giuffre

No one thinks you're on qny side but that of evil. You are trying to criminalize thought crimes and masturbatorial fantasies of innocent people while real child molestors and traffickers get a pass and continue doing it from positions pf power in front of you.

>>513995527
its okay anon i have my drawing right here

>>513990725 (OP)
Holy shit they are actually criminalizing just LOOKING at lolicon in Texas. I mean the supreme court will probably strike it down but it's red right now. Guess we'll see if we're the freedom of speech party, after all.

>>514012998
Do you have a list of shows or movies you do like? It would make recommendations easier.

>>514013323
They use the excuse of "it's not speech" to enable their own cognitive dissonance. Moral busybodies always end up relying on doublethink at some point.

>>514013569
Lost, It's Always Sunny, KOTH, Dexter, Married with Children, Breaking Bad, Ferris Bueller, The Big Lebowski, any 80s comedy. That's all I can think of right now.

>>514013091
me on the right

>>514003006
erm ackshully
you have posted a picture of yoko after the timeskip
she is 21 after the timeskip
so erm ackshully your picture doesn't prove your erm point

>>514013569
you know hyper-religious people don't actually believe in free speech. To say they're anti-American is accurate and to say the Constitution is anti-religious is also obviously accurate because the Founding Fathers were Deist freemasons, not Christians. So Texas being fundamentalist Christian is just going to legislate the way the protestant churches say they should. Not a surprise, really.

>>513990725 (OP)
Is this a case of "nothing ever happens"?