Anonymous
(ID: hfBJaT8S)
8/26/2025, 2:49:43 AM
No.513994390
>>513994612
>>513994636
>>513994675
>>513994737
>>513994903
>>513995057
>>513995155
>>513995965
>>513997906
>>513997938
>>513998276
>>514003699
8/26/2025, 2:49:43 AM
No.513994390
>>513994612
>>513994636
>>513994675
>>513994737
>>513994903
>>513995057
>>513995155
>>513995965
>>513997906
>>513997938
>>513998276
>>514003699
Red Flag Laws will be used to attack you, it already happened to me
Capture.png
md5: a7208a8f... 🔍
A MN district court used my First Amendment protected speech and conduct as evidence to permanently revoke my Second Amendment rights and ostracize me from society.
I was targeted because of my supposed political beliefs, though I hadn't uttered them anywhere. or done anything else to draw attention to myself.
Instead the prosecution relied on evidence stolen from my computer by a member of my household, which the court accepted and took as evidence of my beliefs. The evidence consisted of screenshots of text and image files that the court found objectionable despite being protected by the First Amendment.
The court then issued an Extreme Risk Protection Order, and is now renewing it indefinitely.
There was no sign from me at any time that I intended to commit violence against anyone. There was no threat or plan to commit any violence anywhere in the evidence and nothing like that was even alleged.
The court ignored this and abused its discretion to use my alleged beliefs as a reason to revoke my rights permanently.
This shows a prior restraint - the court expected me to trade my First Amendment rights for my Second Amendment rights and then punished me for not doing so.
Then the police department set about spreading rumors about me to people in my community and petitioned to have me civilly committed forcing me to flee the state of Minnesota.
I was targeted because of my supposed political beliefs, though I hadn't uttered them anywhere. or done anything else to draw attention to myself.
Instead the prosecution relied on evidence stolen from my computer by a member of my household, which the court accepted and took as evidence of my beliefs. The evidence consisted of screenshots of text and image files that the court found objectionable despite being protected by the First Amendment.
The court then issued an Extreme Risk Protection Order, and is now renewing it indefinitely.
There was no sign from me at any time that I intended to commit violence against anyone. There was no threat or plan to commit any violence anywhere in the evidence and nothing like that was even alleged.
The court ignored this and abused its discretion to use my alleged beliefs as a reason to revoke my rights permanently.
This shows a prior restraint - the court expected me to trade my First Amendment rights for my Second Amendment rights and then punished me for not doing so.
Then the police department set about spreading rumors about me to people in my community and petitioned to have me civilly committed forcing me to flee the state of Minnesota.
