Thread 513999420

What are some less common ways you use to detect low IQ?
One that I've been noticing lately is the letter spammer. They'll emphasize a word by spamming one of its letters, typically the last one in a sentence but not always eg "beach dayyyyy". It's an immediate tell for me

using the term iq in place of the term intelligence

>>513999420 (OP)
Someone that consume media meant for the masses
Someone thats always talks without thinking unable to reflect
Someone that cares what people think of them
Someone agreeing with all the positions adopted by the current powers
Someone that lives in hedonism

Just a few

>>513999420 (OP)
Conditional hypotheticals.
Attitude towards pitbulls.
Voice volume control.
Thought abstraction level (empathy to wait staff, for example).
Publicly aggressive body language (ugly, angry stares and prolonged, aggressive eye contact).
Impulsive behavior (cutting in line at a theme park)
Childlike attitudes (demanding free things from customer service)

Most of these things are actually easily and safely observed at a theme park, now that I think about it

Honorable Mentions:
No inner monologue/"voice".
Low intelligence people can easily assume popular opinions, and parrot general ideas, thanks to mass media, but rarely can articulate what makes them believe those things.

Disagreeing with me

>>513999420 (OP)
Antisemitism

>>513999420 (OP)
Wojak posting and leaving off punctuation at the end of a sentence.

>>513999420 (OP)
Posting on this board, tells me immediately that you're low IQ.

>>513999827
I check all the boxes. I know that I am low iq.

>>513999420 (OP)
Antagonism toward the dissimilar.

>>514005828
what this guy said

>>513999420 (OP)
Dark skin, low vitamin D
Loud music with prominent bass
Frequent word misspellings
Attraction to flashing lights and loud noises
Hyperreproductivity

Nu-Speak

>>514003621
Some unsubtle, easily detected and (unfortunately) common words that instantly signify it:
>literally
>unironically

Based on pic rel, I suspect you’re talking more so about mid-wits who aren’t as smart as they think they are than you are actually low IQ. Actual Low IQ (sub-100) is easily perceptible, often even visually. Mid-wits are also easily perceptible but only for people with above average IQ. They often appeal to consensus, and when they ostensibly depart from it, they’ll pass off “hot takes” that they didn’t even come up with as their own and act like it’s controversial even though it’s the default opinion shared by all mid-wits in their social class. They’ll make sure people know they went to college by referencing material from a 101 course they took even though it’s tedious and unimportant for people who have more than the most basic comprehension of the relevant subject or discipline, they’ll make concepts sound more complex than they need to be with superflous vocabulary, they’ll memorize factoids from “academic literature” and use them to make a point in lieu of actual reason, and often reference “logical fallacies” when it’s clear they don’t actually understand logic. Just to name a few things.

>What are some less common ways you use to detect low IQ?
posting on 4chan

>>513999841
>conditional hypotheticals
What's that? Is it the whole "but I did have breakfast" thing?

Also
>Immunity to loud noises
>having to count with fingers or read out loud as an adult
>vacant stares, like the zoomer gaze or the soulless eyes of pajeets

>>513999420 (OP)
using reddit

>>513999420 (OP)
I say Heil Hitler and see how they react

>>513999420 (OP)
They think people are stupid for not knowing certain things due to lack of experience.

>>514010477
Or they think they're smart for knowing random trivia

>>513999420 (OP)
> Being really gullible
> Trusting authority
> "hobbies" like shoes/fashion or trying to be a pro gamer.

Replying to this thread