>>514007230 (OP)
>The libtards on /lit/ think conservative opinions are rooted in sexual perversion.
The generic observation that "repressive sexual shaming produces exactly the degenerate sexual impulses it tries to suppress" is basically correct, because it's a quirk of human sexuality that the shame and anxiety associated with unwanted sexual impulses can be eroticized, so if you're experiencing them intensely it paradoxically makes whatever's producing them potentially very erotic. That doesn't mean that ALL conservative sexual mores are that though, because that phenomenon is not a function of the restrictiveness itself but rather the neurotic methods used to enforce it. The other big leftist fixation is on the idea that support for authoritarianism and hierarchy is basically a projection of wanting to get fucked in the ass by your dad, which I think says more about them than anything else. The idea that those things are inseparable from a (sexualized) dominance/submission dynamic, and further that attraction to them basically represents a yearning for that dynamic, suggests to me a kind of stunted masculine psychological development where you're still angry at / afraid of your father and as a result perceive being anywhere other than the very top of a hierarchy to be intrinsically humiliating, rather than being able to dissolve your ego into the hierarchy and collectively become dad (which ironically is the masculine route to achieving the comprehensive collective care and mutual support that they think attacking these hierarchies is supposed to achieve)